• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically examine how Mahatma Gandhi used the concept of non-violence as a practical tool of resistance to the colonial rule

Extracts from this document...


Critically examine how Mahatma Gandhi used the concept of non-violence as a practical tool of resistance to the colonial rule. Throughout the ages mankind often instinctively turns to the use of violence to defeat an enemy. Violence is part and parcel of the culture of human beings. And yet one of the greatest freedom struggles in modern history was apparently won through the specific rejection of violence, and the active use of a policy of non-violence. That struggle was between the Indian independence movement and the British colonial administration. At the head of that independence movement was Mahatma Gandhi, a simple Indian who held no office or great wealth, and yet was able to unite a whole subcontinent against the British Empire. Not only that, but he did it in such a peaceful, virtuous way that he made the British question their own moral's and eventually forced them out of India. This is the general version that is recorded in history. However, this version of events generally ignores the other forces that influenced the British to withdraw from Empire in India. Here we will critically examine the view that the use of non-violence was the main reason for the ending of British rule in India, by examining the true organisational nature of non-violent civil disobedience, and other events, British and global. ...read more.


So in reality protesters may have been protesting over differing things depending upon which part of India they were in. An article in Young India warned, "Each town, each village may have to become it's own battlefield. The strategy of the battle must then come to be determined by local circumstances and change them from day to day. . . . . They should need little guidance from the outside (Young India: 17th July 1930: Brown). For various reasons tight central control of civil disobedience was impossible. As the global economic crisis deepened through 1930 affecting different regions in varying ways and degrees, so local strategies became more sharply differentiated. This increased local congress leaders' need for freedom from central control if they were to exploit local discontents. Provincial politicians wanted access to the prestige and resources of the all-India body but they did not hesitate to modify or ignore central advice if this clashed with provincial interests. The Raj realised that the Working Committee had limited control over civil disobedience, and the experienced Governor Sir Malcolm Hailey, told Lord Irwin, " I know of course the military argument . . . . . . that the most effective way to cripple the enemy is to strike a crushing blow at his most vital point. ...read more.


Ironically though, it was the British who gave India the instruments with which to resist colonial rule and establish a nation. The railways united a whole continent in a way that had never been done before. Great distances could be travelled relatively quickly by even the most lowly peasant and political campaigners could move quickly. For the first time, ordinary Indian's looked upon India as one country. The establishment of universities and provincial governments educated enough Indian's in the art governance that they felt confident enough to ask for the power to govern without foreign help. Indeed, Gandhi himself had been educated in law in England. The hegemony of the English language was a great communication device, as it gradually became the only language that people from all over India could unite around. These factors were instrumental in ensuring the widespread appeal of the Indian National Congress. The British finally left for several reasons, most of them international. But the non-violence struggle was of course an important factor in the ending of British rule. Any use of violence would allow the British to be seen as 'the law' protecting India from 'vandals', and so justify the continuance of the Raj for a little longer. Without the non-violence movement the British would probably have moved at a much slower pace than they did, but even Britain could not fight against the economic and international climate that made British withdrawal from India inevitable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Decolonisation in India.

    When Indian co-operation in any form was finality denied it, as it was in 1942 with the Quit India movement, the days of British hegemony were strictly numbered. What is important, however, was not that Britain was forced to withdraw, as the way that withdrawal, when it came, was actually accomplished.

  2. "In the two decades before the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War, a profound ...

    Economic prosperity added to their self-importance. iii. Before, the British never took any action regarding the colonies; but in 1763 when they decided to take action, the crisis of the British Empire began. VI. Other Influences i. The European Enlightenment professed natural laws, which promoted that humans had "natural rights" to life, liberty, and property.

  1. Political Violence in Ireland.

    She suggests further as an explanation that 'no one questions or examines what is obvious to all.'1 Townshend explains that there are three major categories of political violence that have emerged: the spontaneous collective violence (or social violence), terrorism, and open insurrection.2 These forms, and their functions, are good subjects

  2. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    2 'Institutional Hearing: The Faith Community', Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa report, (Cape Town: 1999) Vol. 4 Chapter 3, p78 3 E.g. Jos´┐Ż Chipenda, 'Namibia - a sign of hope', in Eds. Hallencreutz and Palmberg, Religion and Politics in Southern Africa, (Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet 1991), pp 48-56 4

  1. The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia

    domestic and foreign and such government functions as the army and police, and a variety of services throughout Burma. However, they were a minority of the official community and if Burma was to pay for itself, it was essential that lower salaried officials could be Indians.

  2. Party system in India

    at the Centre raised the hope of a two-party system taking shape. But the 1977 election results were only a protest against the Emergency regime of the Congress rather than a support for the Janata party's leadership. The badly divided Janata party increasingly demonstrated its incapacity to govern satisfactorily and

  1. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    The country was still producing and exporting more than enough grain crops to have fed the population, however this was a cash crop and not a food crop, and as such according to the British Free trade policies could not be interfered with.

  2. Deception Point by Dan Brown

    Therefore, this story is an examination of the role of control and power in the political arena. The story exposed personal and social values central to the culture of developed nations. The story follows a typical narrative pattern of stasis, disruption, resolution and return to stasis.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work