• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically examine how Mahatma Gandhi used the concept of non-violence as a practical tool of resistance to the colonial rule

Extracts from this document...


Critically examine how Mahatma Gandhi used the concept of non-violence as a practical tool of resistance to the colonial rule. Throughout the ages mankind often instinctively turns to the use of violence to defeat an enemy. Violence is part and parcel of the culture of human beings. And yet one of the greatest freedom struggles in modern history was apparently won through the specific rejection of violence, and the active use of a policy of non-violence. That struggle was between the Indian independence movement and the British colonial administration. At the head of that independence movement was Mahatma Gandhi, a simple Indian who held no office or great wealth, and yet was able to unite a whole subcontinent against the British Empire. Not only that, but he did it in such a peaceful, virtuous way that he made the British question their own moral's and eventually forced them out of India. This is the general version that is recorded in history. However, this version of events generally ignores the other forces that influenced the British to withdraw from Empire in India. Here we will critically examine the view that the use of non-violence was the main reason for the ending of British rule in India, by examining the true organisational nature of non-violent civil disobedience, and other events, British and global. ...read more.


So in reality protesters may have been protesting over differing things depending upon which part of India they were in. An article in Young India warned, "Each town, each village may have to become it's own battlefield. The strategy of the battle must then come to be determined by local circumstances and change them from day to day. . . . . They should need little guidance from the outside (Young India: 17th July 1930: Brown). For various reasons tight central control of civil disobedience was impossible. As the global economic crisis deepened through 1930 affecting different regions in varying ways and degrees, so local strategies became more sharply differentiated. This increased local congress leaders' need for freedom from central control if they were to exploit local discontents. Provincial politicians wanted access to the prestige and resources of the all-India body but they did not hesitate to modify or ignore central advice if this clashed with provincial interests. The Raj realised that the Working Committee had limited control over civil disobedience, and the experienced Governor Sir Malcolm Hailey, told Lord Irwin, " I know of course the military argument . . . . . . that the most effective way to cripple the enemy is to strike a crushing blow at his most vital point. ...read more.


Ironically though, it was the British who gave India the instruments with which to resist colonial rule and establish a nation. The railways united a whole continent in a way that had never been done before. Great distances could be travelled relatively quickly by even the most lowly peasant and political campaigners could move quickly. For the first time, ordinary Indian's looked upon India as one country. The establishment of universities and provincial governments educated enough Indian's in the art governance that they felt confident enough to ask for the power to govern without foreign help. Indeed, Gandhi himself had been educated in law in England. The hegemony of the English language was a great communication device, as it gradually became the only language that people from all over India could unite around. These factors were instrumental in ensuring the widespread appeal of the Indian National Congress. The British finally left for several reasons, most of them international. But the non-violence struggle was of course an important factor in the ending of British rule. Any use of violence would allow the British to be seen as 'the law' protecting India from 'vandals', and so justify the continuance of the Raj for a little longer. Without the non-violence movement the British would probably have moved at a much slower pace than they did, but even Britain could not fight against the economic and international climate that made British withdrawal from India inevitable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Party system in India

    The regional and minority support bases of the Congress were eroding. It was a time characterised by abundant alternation between parties in power at the State and national levels, by continued decay and fragmentation within parties and by a tendency towards personalised control of parties.

  2. 'Nationalist Groups in the Sub-Continent played the most significant role in Britain's decision to ...

    The Amritsar massacre incensed nationalism. Which caused many Indians to join the INC and it very quickly became the party of the masses. This was another mistake by the British which angered many, this incident was caused by the Rowlatt Act in 1919, which undermined the Government of India Act,

  1. Green is the Colour: "how people of different races, the heirs of colonial and ...

    Hence, from a political perspective, Malaysians, no matter Malays or non-Malays are forced to ponder on the issue of whether are they willing to forgo the peace and stability that the nation has been trying to achieve by casting their votes for the fundamentalists.

  2. "In the two decades before the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War, a profound ...

    had their authority undermined by inadequate support in England and by their challenge by powerful assemblies in America. d. The relationship between the colonies and Britain was uneasy. i. The colonies achieved much political competence. They had their own political institutions controlled by local elites who governed with the support of the people.

  1. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    Musharraf promised to improve the existing government institutions. Musharraf's government fulfilled its promise by giving judicial independence. He also gave the press the freedom they were seeking and started new health and educational programmes. 10.1 Musharraf and Kashmir: According to Dr. Jon P. Dorschner 'The September 11 terrorist attack against the United States and the subsequent opening of

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    Meanwhile the pretenders started to surrender, were Russia gave up her claims forever and Ferdinand VI didn't want to put extra pressure on Malta, as he didn't want to fight with Britain, as the latter was crucial in her aid whenever France attacked here.

  1. Nationalism as applied to business

    With the appropriate emphasis on its greatest health needs, incentives for public-private R&D partnerships, and a sound set of regulations India may well set an example amongst developing countries and perhaps for the rest of the world. The proposed opinion leaders' network will help to achieve the goals outlined by the participants of the Genomics and Public Policy course.

  2. The Life and Times of Dr. Kwame Nkrumah The Road to Ghana's Colonial Independence

    Once political independence was achieved, Nkrumah argued, economic and cultural liberation would shortly follow. Kwame's policy of positive action left blow to the British government when he implemented. He rallied people with propaganda signs and the CPP flag colored red, white, and green followed by the use of party songs

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work