• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Decolonisation in India.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Decolonisation in India Howard Brasted That Britain played any positive role in dismantling the Raj and setting up in its place the sovereign states of India and Pakistan, is now almost totally discounted in the historiography of decolonisation in India. It was only in the warm aftermath of independence that part of that story was defined in terms of British imperial planing. This version, concentrating on British administration and achievements, had India being practically wet-nursed to freedom through a series of progressive, graduated, constitutional stages. Thus, when the settlement of 1947 finally arrived, it was presented as a long-standing rather than a last-minute destination, the culmination rather than the confounding of British rule. It followed that power was actually transferred to India and Pakistan as an act of statesmanship. A counter version, identifying an all embracing Indian nationalism as the major factor undermining the colonial order, had the Indian people being led out of bondage by means of orchestrated, mass agitation. Accordingly, constitutional concessions were wrested from a parsimonious and reluctant empire; they were never freely given. It was only when faced with total administrative collapse and the prospect of being bodily thrown out that the British decided to cut their losses and run. ...read more.

Middle

Should indigenous government begin to threaten British interests, the Viceroy's veto might be invoked to protect them. Indeed, no major British statesman in the depression era believed that there would be a full transfer of power within their life-times, let alone the next decade. With a clear itinerary and timetable of de-commission blurred, so by extension was any ideological commitment to the goal of Indian freedom. If the Conservatives, who dominated government in the interwar years, were shown predominantly framing answers to the Indian Question with an eye to keeping British hands firmly on the 'gears' of India, J. A. Gallagher's somewhat cynical theory of 'interpenetration' proceeded to associate the Labour Party with much the same priority. Socialists were just closet Tories, surreptitiously rather than openly committed to shoring up imperial control. Conjuring up the notion that a broad bipartisan agreement was reached about retaining a foothold in India Gallagher proceeded to pass off independence as a 'new technique' designed to contrive this. That Labour's brand of devolution was really imperialism camouflaged, was taken further by Anita Inder Singh who espied in the Attlee government's negotiating strategy a devious bid to secure the 'very survival of Pax Britannica'. With the possible exception of R. ...read more.

Conclusion

AU this amounted to and became widely known at the time as Labour's 'ballot box' principle of 'democratic self-determination'. That Labour was not able fully to supply its method until 20 February 1947 had little to do with any alleged 'interpenetration' with the Tories or other presumed handicaps. It had everything to do with contingencies inspired by the war, the unamenability of Churchill during it and the diversionary tactics of Wavell after it. Proclaiming, despite constant briefings, that he did not know what Labour's itinerary was, the Viceroy persistently departed from to route Labour had long proposed to take; hence his dismissal. Even with such obstacles-Labour still managed to initiate the two most important moves that were made to bring about a settlement prior to the final breakthrough-the Cripps Offer of 1942 and the Cabinet Mission of 1946. Although these failed this had much less to do with ideological insincerity, hidden agendas or lack of commitment to ending the Raj, than with the intractability of communal discord. CONCLUSION To date most of the action has been focused on the Indian side of the field. But can the plays of Indian nationalism and Muslim separatism, important though they were, be fury appraised without reference to the specific initiatives Britain actuary took? Unless due regard is given to that aspect the story of decolonization is left unbalanced and incomplete. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    void37 - the South African government abolished the system in January 1983. A second attempt culminated in the 1985 Transitional Government of National Unity (TGNU). This gave more legislative and executive power, although security, defence and foreign affairs remained in South African control.

  2. The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia

    and 1930s, which stressed the need to to ensure adequate representation of the local population among the government civil servants and taking steps to protect the interests of the Malays when they seemed threatened by an immigrant population that outnumbered them in some states.

  1. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    before it was too late."23 Whilst stressing in his 1942 "Quit India"24 campaign, "We shall either free India or die in the attempt; we shall not live to see the perpetuation of our slavery,"25 the campaign backfired. Repeated successes against the Japanese saw British confidence increase under Lord Wavell.

  2. Party system in India

    1967-1977 Alongside the Congress dominance we also notice the sprouting of the second phase. New opposition parties began to emerge in the 1950s and 1960s. If the 50s saw the consolidation of the Congress, the late 60s and 70s saw the consolidation of the non-Congress parties.

  1. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    By this time it was clear that the sanctions for restricting UNITA's ability to sustain its forces were not working, and the UN launched an investigation into UNITA's sanctions' busting36. This external factor sought to tighten the belt around those supporting UNITA's illicit diamond trade by threatening to name and shame them.

  2. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    career outside London."3 With Edinburgh as the country's capital, government is less centralised and more accessible to the whole nation, even those in the far Highlands. It also ensured the mass media was representative of the country. Unlike England, where all media output stems from the Capital, Scotland has a high circulation regional newspapers and programming.

  1. 'Nationalist Groups in the Sub-Continent played the most significant role in Britain's decision to ...

    Some people felt that the very nature of Islam called for a communal Muslim society. These memories might have made it exceptionally difficult for Muslims to accept the imposition of colonial power and culture. They refused to learn English and to associate with the British.

  2. The British Suffragette movement.

    women's suffrage movement in the 19th century, but within a Radical-Liberal current that was critical of NUWSS tactics which she believed were ineffective. She and her husband were also keen members of the Independent Labour Party (ILP) in their home town of Chorlton in Manchester.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work