• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Decolonisation in India.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Decolonisation in India Howard Brasted That Britain played any positive role in dismantling the Raj and setting up in its place the sovereign states of India and Pakistan, is now almost totally discounted in the historiography of decolonisation in India. It was only in the warm aftermath of independence that part of that story was defined in terms of British imperial planing. This version, concentrating on British administration and achievements, had India being practically wet-nursed to freedom through a series of progressive, graduated, constitutional stages. Thus, when the settlement of 1947 finally arrived, it was presented as a long-standing rather than a last-minute destination, the culmination rather than the confounding of British rule. It followed that power was actually transferred to India and Pakistan as an act of statesmanship. A counter version, identifying an all embracing Indian nationalism as the major factor undermining the colonial order, had the Indian people being led out of bondage by means of orchestrated, mass agitation. Accordingly, constitutional concessions were wrested from a parsimonious and reluctant empire; they were never freely given. It was only when faced with total administrative collapse and the prospect of being bodily thrown out that the British decided to cut their losses and run. ...read more.

Middle

Should indigenous government begin to threaten British interests, the Viceroy's veto might be invoked to protect them. Indeed, no major British statesman in the depression era believed that there would be a full transfer of power within their life-times, let alone the next decade. With a clear itinerary and timetable of de-commission blurred, so by extension was any ideological commitment to the goal of Indian freedom. If the Conservatives, who dominated government in the interwar years, were shown predominantly framing answers to the Indian Question with an eye to keeping British hands firmly on the 'gears' of India, J. A. Gallagher's somewhat cynical theory of 'interpenetration' proceeded to associate the Labour Party with much the same priority. Socialists were just closet Tories, surreptitiously rather than openly committed to shoring up imperial control. Conjuring up the notion that a broad bipartisan agreement was reached about retaining a foothold in India Gallagher proceeded to pass off independence as a 'new technique' designed to contrive this. That Labour's brand of devolution was really imperialism camouflaged, was taken further by Anita Inder Singh who espied in the Attlee government's negotiating strategy a devious bid to secure the 'very survival of Pax Britannica'. With the possible exception of R. ...read more.

Conclusion

AU this amounted to and became widely known at the time as Labour's 'ballot box' principle of 'democratic self-determination'. That Labour was not able fully to supply its method until 20 February 1947 had little to do with any alleged 'interpenetration' with the Tories or other presumed handicaps. It had everything to do with contingencies inspired by the war, the unamenability of Churchill during it and the diversionary tactics of Wavell after it. Proclaiming, despite constant briefings, that he did not know what Labour's itinerary was, the Viceroy persistently departed from to route Labour had long proposed to take; hence his dismissal. Even with such obstacles-Labour still managed to initiate the two most important moves that were made to bring about a settlement prior to the final breakthrough-the Cripps Offer of 1942 and the Cabinet Mission of 1946. Although these failed this had much less to do with ideological insincerity, hidden agendas or lack of commitment to ending the Raj, than with the intractability of communal discord. CONCLUSION To date most of the action has been focused on the Indian side of the field. But can the plays of Indian nationalism and Muslim separatism, important though they were, be fury appraised without reference to the specific initiatives Britain actuary took? Unless due regard is given to that aspect the story of decolonization is left unbalanced and incomplete. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    The only major factor in Gandhi's favour was that British elections after WWII in 1945 made it clear that the British public was no longer prepared to make sacrifices to maintain British supremacy in India, and thus moves towards independence were made.

  2. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    and Moderator Gowaseb (ELC) wrote an open letter to the South African Prime Minister B.J. Vorster. It illustrated the injustices Namibians suffered, such as limitations on movement and settlement, no basic political rights or franchise, and low wages due to the migrant labour system.

  1. Party system in India

    Morris - Jones said that the Congress had 'the ability to hold together various sectional interests within one organisation'. Writing on the 'Congress system' in early 1960s, Kothari said, 'there was plurality within the Congress that made it more representative'.

  2. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    The war was twice deadly; death resulted from fighting, but also from disease and hunger. This was aggravated by the huge number of internally displaced people, which peaked in 2001 at four million people (about a third of the population)46.

  1. 'Nationalist Groups in the Sub-Continent played the most significant role in Britain's decision to ...

    Some people felt that the very nature of Islam called for a communal Muslim society. These memories might have made it exceptionally difficult for Muslims to accept the imposition of colonial power and culture. They refused to learn English and to associate with the British.

  2. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    They demanded their own courts of law and also to keep control over their churches, disregarding the Church of England. One final significant difference is the emergence of Edinburgh as a competitor to London. With their own separate body of Scots' law, the supreme courts in Edinburgh "offer a high-level

  1. Describe the part played by India in the Second World War.

    This increased British government's expenditure. Empire is also very expensive, Britain had already spent over �1,000,000,000 on India, if this continued, Britain would bankrupt. Therefore in 1945 to 46, the British government decided to deconlonise India. The League and the Congress were enemies since 1930.

  2. Why and to what extent did the 1980s mark a change in the role ...

    The government needed to control its own spending by setting strict spending targets, but these were often exceeded and the chancellor forced to set new targets. However in 1985 growth figures were well above targets, 19 percent against a target of 5-9 percent and yet inflation did fall sharply.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work