• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the part played by India in the Second World War.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question one: Describe the part played by India in the Second World War. In September 1939, Lord Linlithgow, the Viceroy of India declared war on Germany without consulting the Indian Assembly. India being the Britain's colony supported the war effort at that time. During the first year, the government did very little to help the Britain. However, during the later years, the Indian Army did not only fight for Britain, but also fought for the ally in the world war against Germany, Italy and Japan. They also fought in North Africa, Italy, France and South Asia for Britain with loyalty and bravery. This was proved by the Rajputs and the Punjabis being praised for their bravery when fighting in Hong Kong and in Singapore. According to reliable statistics, about 1,250,000 Indians volunteered to join the British army. Other than helping the allies, India also helped other countries like China to build roads from Calcutta to Chiang Kai Shek, so that China could get aids from other countries while they were struggling under the Japanese's occupation. The people in India were very united and loyal other than volunteering to join the army, about 2.5 million servicemen and women contributed to the war effort on their own choice. Other than joining the British army, the Indians also helped Britain with their economy during the war. ...read more.

Middle

All the above showed that there was a lack of trust between India and Britain. As India did not do very much in helping the Britain during World War Two, British government sent Cripps to negotiate that if India helped in the war effort, British would then leave India in return. However, the congress rejected this plan, and carried out the "Quit India" campaign trying to throw British government out. This showed that the Indians were not satisfied with the British government. In conclusion, I think that government and the Congress was always enemies and they never really co-operated with each other. The relationship between Britain and the League: The Muslim League was set up in 1906 by Muslims who feared of Hindu domination and discrimination. But during that time, most important Muslim leaders were in the Congress. Jinnah resigned and became the leader of the Muslim League in the 1930s. When the second Government of India Act was executed, the League rejected the act because the Muslims and the League did not gain much power as the result of that. This showed that the League was not very satisfied with British rule before World War two. However this was not the case during and after the war. The League fully co-operated with the British government, and supported the British government in India. ...read more.

Conclusion

But it turned that the Direct Action was a series of bloodsheds between the Hindus and Muslims. Therefore the British government appointed Lord Mountbatten to settle this problem. Mountbatten came up with the conclusion that if there are two separate state, the bloodsheds would stop. He then persuaded the Congress, and the Congress agreed to partition on 3 June, 1947. The four most important individuals involved in the decision making were Nehru, Gandhi, Jinnah and Lord Mountbatten. Nehru and Gandhi were the leaders of the Congress party. They always wanted a united India as they believed that the people must be united to develop the country. However Lord Mountbatten persuaded them that it was impossible in 1947. They agreed with Mountbatten's proposal on 3 june, 1947. Mountbatten was the most important of all. He decided to partition India and persuaded the Congress to accept his proposal. However he had too little time to fix the border of the two countries, which lead to continuous violence between the Hindus and the Muslims. He was also appointed by the British government to divide all the government's assets and gold reserve to both countries. Lastly, Jinnah was the leader of the Muslim League. He wanted a new state called Pakistan, which meant "Land of Pure" and it is also an acronym of the states at the north-west of India. He was important because he called for the Direct Action and forced the Congress to accept Mountbatten's proposal. Sai Yuet CHOW 11N 5437 History Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Decolonisation in India.

    India might have begun to cost Britain, but Britain did not want to leave anyway; because to have left would have accelerated the loss of Britain's global influence. To salvage a remnant of prestige the British attempted to snare India in a defence treaty and Commonwealth membership.

  2. The Negative Impact Of World War 1 On Italy: Weaknesses Of The Liberal State, ...

    The police tended to ignore the Fascist violence as they too felt threatened by socialism. Italy 1921-1922: The end of the Liberal support base Government became even more unstable (if that were possible!) after the election of May 1921. There were three governments between May 1921 and October 1922 as

  1. 'Nationalist Groups in the Sub-Continent played the most significant role in Britain's decision to ...

    This particular event intensified nationalism, and created a rift between the British and the civilian population. These events show that there were distinct problems created by the differences between Muslims and Hindus, and these problems led to nationalist movements. As early as 1917, Britain had toyed with the idea of

  2. Party system in India

    Consolidation of opposition parties and emergence of multi-party system (1977-89); Shaping of coalitional party system (1989 onwards) 1952-67 At the time the country became independent it had several parties competing with each other although the Indian National Congress had an imposing presence.

  1. Is Legalization a Realistic Alternative to the War on Marijuana?

    However, Swisher reveals the most appalling of all expenses. She divulges that the government spends over thirty billion dollars to keep marijuana offenders in jail (20). This means that the government is spending well over fifty billion dollars each year fighting the war on drugs. The majority of taxpayers do not realize how expensive the war truly is.

  2. This dispute dates back to the partition of the British Indian Empire, in August ...

    They formed their own government on 24th October, 1947. On 27th of October, 1947, the Government of India alleged that the ruler had acceded to India on the basis of a fraudulent instrument of accession, sent its forces into the State and occupied a large part of Jammu and Kashmir.

  1. State and Society in India

    According to Khotari, between 1947 and 1967, India's party system was characterised by "dominance coexisting with competition but without a trace of alternation", that is to say that opposition had little hope of preventing the Congress from obtaining sizeable majorities in the legislature, as a consequence, they had to content

  2. The American Civil War

    He was also the first in a series of presidents who acted without regard to the effects their actions might have on the future. (Garraty 381, Anonymous "William..." 3) The issue of Tyler's accedence to the presidency was a topic of much Constitutional debate, but he was confident of his position as the Chief Executive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work