• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the part played by India in the Second World War.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question one: Describe the part played by India in the Second World War. In September 1939, Lord Linlithgow, the Viceroy of India declared war on Germany without consulting the Indian Assembly. India being the Britain's colony supported the war effort at that time. During the first year, the government did very little to help the Britain. However, during the later years, the Indian Army did not only fight for Britain, but also fought for the ally in the world war against Germany, Italy and Japan. They also fought in North Africa, Italy, France and South Asia for Britain with loyalty and bravery. This was proved by the Rajputs and the Punjabis being praised for their bravery when fighting in Hong Kong and in Singapore. According to reliable statistics, about 1,250,000 Indians volunteered to join the British army. Other than helping the allies, India also helped other countries like China to build roads from Calcutta to Chiang Kai Shek, so that China could get aids from other countries while they were struggling under the Japanese's occupation. The people in India were very united and loyal other than volunteering to join the army, about 2.5 million servicemen and women contributed to the war effort on their own choice. Other than joining the British army, the Indians also helped Britain with their economy during the war. ...read more.

Middle

All the above showed that there was a lack of trust between India and Britain. As India did not do very much in helping the Britain during World War Two, British government sent Cripps to negotiate that if India helped in the war effort, British would then leave India in return. However, the congress rejected this plan, and carried out the "Quit India" campaign trying to throw British government out. This showed that the Indians were not satisfied with the British government. In conclusion, I think that government and the Congress was always enemies and they never really co-operated with each other. The relationship between Britain and the League: The Muslim League was set up in 1906 by Muslims who feared of Hindu domination and discrimination. But during that time, most important Muslim leaders were in the Congress. Jinnah resigned and became the leader of the Muslim League in the 1930s. When the second Government of India Act was executed, the League rejected the act because the Muslims and the League did not gain much power as the result of that. This showed that the League was not very satisfied with British rule before World War two. However this was not the case during and after the war. The League fully co-operated with the British government, and supported the British government in India. ...read more.

Conclusion

But it turned that the Direct Action was a series of bloodsheds between the Hindus and Muslims. Therefore the British government appointed Lord Mountbatten to settle this problem. Mountbatten came up with the conclusion that if there are two separate state, the bloodsheds would stop. He then persuaded the Congress, and the Congress agreed to partition on 3 June, 1947. The four most important individuals involved in the decision making were Nehru, Gandhi, Jinnah and Lord Mountbatten. Nehru and Gandhi were the leaders of the Congress party. They always wanted a united India as they believed that the people must be united to develop the country. However Lord Mountbatten persuaded them that it was impossible in 1947. They agreed with Mountbatten's proposal on 3 june, 1947. Mountbatten was the most important of all. He decided to partition India and persuaded the Congress to accept his proposal. However he had too little time to fix the border of the two countries, which lead to continuous violence between the Hindus and the Muslims. He was also appointed by the British government to divide all the government's assets and gold reserve to both countries. Lastly, Jinnah was the leader of the Muslim League. He wanted a new state called Pakistan, which meant "Land of Pure" and it is also an acronym of the states at the north-west of India. He was important because he called for the Direct Action and forced the Congress to accept Mountbatten's proposal. Sai Yuet CHOW 11N 5437 History Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. 'Nationalist Groups in the Sub-Continent played the most significant role in Britain's decision to ...

    that people from a country had a right to govern themselves. The whole concept of national self-determination undermined the basic idea of the British Empire - that the British governed this empire .For national self-determination to fully work, India would have to be governed by the Indians living there.

  2. Party system in India

    Parties such as the Shiromani Akali Dal, National Conference, Forward Bloc, Communist party of India Revolutionary Socialist Party etc existed in independent India. 53 political parties participated in the first General Elections, although most of them vanished within a decade or reappeared in new incarnations later.

  1. This dispute dates back to the partition of the British Indian Empire, in August ...

    India's own pledges to that effect, and reiteration of their commitment of resolving the Kashmir issue in the Simla Agreement of 1972 signed between Pakistan and India after the 1971 war, India continues to remain in illegal occupation of a large part of Jammu and Kashmir, refuses to allow the

  2. The Negative Impact Of World War 1 On Italy: Weaknesses Of The Liberal State, ...

    The police tended to ignore the Fascist violence as they too felt threatened by socialism. Italy 1921-1922: The end of the Liberal support base Government became even more unstable (if that were possible!) after the election of May 1921. There were three governments between May 1921 and October 1922 as

  1. Is Legalization a Realistic Alternative to the War on Marijuana?

    Along similar points, Nadelman states that legalization would result in purity assurance under FDA regulation, labeled concentration, no black market, the reduction of crime, and savings from spending (112). These are some very strong arguments, as a potential consequence of marijuana being illegal is the chance of receiving some that may not be truly marijuana.

  2. The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia

    British rule never gave rise to such a dislike that it should encourage the racial communities to establish a united front. 3. The British administration had retained the feudal structure of Malay society and it made sure it had the loyalty of the aristocratic ruling class.

  1. HUMANITIES COURSEWORK

    Link to that, it seems that this wall has been built on land that was previously not agreed on by both parties. The Green Line separates Israel not only from these countries but from territories Israel would later capture in the 1967 Six-Day War, including the West Bank, Gaza Strip,

  2. Decolonisation in India.

    At this level the thrust for taking the fight to the British and returning nationalism to the realm of anti-colonial struggle was provided not so much by 'elites' as by 'subalterns'-peasants, tribals, workers and lower classes. The traditional 'history from above' was not replaced but it was significantly refined.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work