• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do Elections guarantee Democracy?

Extracts from this document...


Do Elections guarantee Democracy? Democracy is a complex practice and no system can actually guarantee perfect democracy. It involves the representation of people as a whole. Our democracy is said to be a liberal one. This involves individuals having the right to express their views about who should represent us. Our democracy is also described as being pluralistic. It is essential for a democracy to be plural. This involves the expression of many types of views in the democracy. Democracy is a government by people. The people who are part of the government are there by the consent of citizens in society who have voted for them. The consent can be withdrawn by people refusing to vote. In 1997, John Major's consent to be our prime minister was withdrawn because the majority of us refused to vote for him. Elections are a part and parcel of democracy. This is how we take part in a democracy. The elections give us the opportunity to vote for which person we think is the best to represent us. However, elections are not very fair and representative and don't always represent everyone in a fair way. There are several different types of voting systems which are used to elections. There is the First Past The Post system and The Proportional Representation system. ...read more.


There is no point in having an election if not all sections of society are suitably informed. The current electoral system shows that there is a lot of discrimination against women and ethnic groups. Over 50% of the population are female, yet less than 1 in 5 MPs are women. It is clearly not very democratic that mostly males represent our population. This also applies to ethnic minorities, they only gained representation in 1987, but there were only 4 MPs. In 1997 the figure had risen to 7. The ethnic minority play a huge role in London and in many other cities across Britain and deserve far more representation. The people to blame for this are the local party selection committee. They prefer to choose "safe" candidates who suit the criteria of being white, male and middle aged. Greater anticipation of women and ethnic minorities is essential so that more groups are represented. The PR system is one which is preferred and used in many other European countries. A PR system is more representative than a FPTP system but it is still not perfect. The AV system retains a direct link between MPs and constituents and ensures that the winner has a majority of support at local level. This type of system is fairer to the smaller parties such as the Liberal Democrats and the Green party. ...read more.


in 1992, there should have been a referendum on the Maastricht Treaty under the Major Government. John Major had mentioned in the Conservative Manifesto that we will not be signing the Maastricht Treaty and will therefore not join the Euro. So when he was in power he refused to hold a referendum because he claimed that the public had given him a mandate because they had voted for him and they were aware of his policies. The result of this election has lead to a type of dictatorship from Major and refusing to have a referendum is refusing to represent and listen to the views of the general public and what other parties have to say. Elections do not guarantee total democracy. Total democracy can never be reached as not every single person in a country will be represented fairly. However, different types of electoral systems such as PR can guarantee a higher level of democracy than systems such as FPTP. The only times when elections have a great impact on democracy is when a greater proportion of the population who are eligible to vote actually make the effort. It is also vital that everyone is well informed and that the media behaves in a responsive manner so that people choose to vote on their own choice, not because newspapers have influenced them. Having achieved this, elections will be more representative and democratic. However, democracy will not be guaranteed but we will live in a far more equal and representative society. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Arguments for and Against the use of Referendums in the UK

    they were in a position to insist on a referendum as a condition for supporting a bill, as happened in 1978 over devolution. However, backbencher MPs may disagree as their role as a representative to their constituency may be at risk as the use of referendums increases since constituents use their MP to put forward their ideas in Parliament.

  2. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    They eventually merged with the Whigs and began to be known as the Liberal Party with the ex-Foreign Minister Lord Palmerston forming the first Liberal government in 1855. The origins of Gladstonian Liberalism and Disraelian Conservatism After the destruction of Peel's Conservative party the whole nature of mid Victorian politics changed.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    one more vote than their closest rivals. Hence in seats where the vote splits almost equally three ways, the winning candidate may have only 35% of the vote, while the other contestants get 34% and 32% respectively. Although two-thirds of voters supported other candidates, the plurality of votes is decisive.

  2. Did Democracy Survive in Britain in the 1930's as a Result of the Policies ...

    In 1936 came one of important acts made by the National Government. The Public Order Act passed banned the wearing of any political uniforms, which included the familiar armbands of the extremists, and it also gave police extra powers

  1. Political parties and representation

    Even though, as previously stressed one must be careful not to accept government rationalizations at face value, it is arguable that single parties have often assisted the process of political integration of different regions and communities. Certainly, multi-party competition has often contributed to intensification of ethnic antagonisms, sometimes leading to

  2. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    It would be right to say that reformation in the House of Lords where hereditary peers are being eradicated is a good thing as it allows more democracy. Which will give more seats to individuals who have earned their place in the House of Lords rather than those who were heirs.

  1. Consider the arguments for and against retaining first-past-the-post for general elections

    The argument of strong government isn't even always true, as first-past-the-post doesn't invariably produce a single-party majority. There have been three occasions in the last 50 years on which no single party has won a majority of seats. Another important criticism of first-past-the-post is its denial of an effective voter choice.

  2. The main features of Britain's democracy.

    Religion, other forms of political ideas, background, sex and sexual preference of a person should not be viewed as revolutionary tendencies when referring to politics. So therefore most governments are pluralist. In a pluralist democracy various parties express different opinions that come from people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work