• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do Elections guarantee Democracy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do Elections guarantee Democracy? Democracy is a complex practice and no system can actually guarantee perfect democracy. It involves the representation of people as a whole. Our democracy is said to be a liberal one. This involves individuals having the right to express their views about who should represent us. Our democracy is also described as being pluralistic. It is essential for a democracy to be plural. This involves the expression of many types of views in the democracy. Democracy is a government by people. The people who are part of the government are there by the consent of citizens in society who have voted for them. The consent can be withdrawn by people refusing to vote. In 1997, John Major's consent to be our prime minister was withdrawn because the majority of us refused to vote for him. Elections are a part and parcel of democracy. This is how we take part in a democracy. The elections give us the opportunity to vote for which person we think is the best to represent us. However, elections are not very fair and representative and don't always represent everyone in a fair way. There are several different types of voting systems which are used to elections. There is the First Past The Post system and The Proportional Representation system. ...read more.

Middle

There is no point in having an election if not all sections of society are suitably informed. The current electoral system shows that there is a lot of discrimination against women and ethnic groups. Over 50% of the population are female, yet less than 1 in 5 MPs are women. It is clearly not very democratic that mostly males represent our population. This also applies to ethnic minorities, they only gained representation in 1987, but there were only 4 MPs. In 1997 the figure had risen to 7. The ethnic minority play a huge role in London and in many other cities across Britain and deserve far more representation. The people to blame for this are the local party selection committee. They prefer to choose "safe" candidates who suit the criteria of being white, male and middle aged. Greater anticipation of women and ethnic minorities is essential so that more groups are represented. The PR system is one which is preferred and used in many other European countries. A PR system is more representative than a FPTP system but it is still not perfect. The AV system retains a direct link between MPs and constituents and ensures that the winner has a majority of support at local level. This type of system is fairer to the smaller parties such as the Liberal Democrats and the Green party. ...read more.

Conclusion

in 1992, there should have been a referendum on the Maastricht Treaty under the Major Government. John Major had mentioned in the Conservative Manifesto that we will not be signing the Maastricht Treaty and will therefore not join the Euro. So when he was in power he refused to hold a referendum because he claimed that the public had given him a mandate because they had voted for him and they were aware of his policies. The result of this election has lead to a type of dictatorship from Major and refusing to have a referendum is refusing to represent and listen to the views of the general public and what other parties have to say. Elections do not guarantee total democracy. Total democracy can never be reached as not every single person in a country will be represented fairly. However, different types of electoral systems such as PR can guarantee a higher level of democracy than systems such as FPTP. The only times when elections have a great impact on democracy is when a greater proportion of the population who are eligible to vote actually make the effort. It is also vital that everyone is well informed and that the media behaves in a responsive manner so that people choose to vote on their own choice, not because newspapers have influenced them. Having achieved this, elections will be more representative and democratic. However, democracy will not be guaranteed but we will live in a far more equal and representative society. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How do elections promote democracy?

    * People would prefer to have a representative from the party they support rather than a single MP to represent constituents. So now we come to our main question. How do elections promote democracy? Voting in the election of public officials is the most visible and common form of participation in modern democracies and also the most fundamental.

  2. Arguments for and Against the use of Referendums in the UK

    This cannot be done in a general election, as the public doesn't always vote for party policies in particular, maybe because they are not fully aware of the policies in the first place. In 1975, the Leader of the House of Commons, Ted Short, justified the use of a referendum

  1. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    They reject the state and its legitimate authority as they feel it impends on their freedom. As Scruton quoted 'written constitution' is a good attempt rescue democracy by limiting the sphere of popular choice'. This would therefore make it harder to pass laws and legislation if there was too much

  2. Consider the arguments for and against retaining first-past-the-post for general elections

    It is quite easy for a voter to last their entire life without playing a part in successfully electing an MP. Neither do voters have choice in the selection of candidates. The selectorate of each party decides upon its candidate, and so in 'safe' seats it is the selectorate of

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    constituencies do far less well than those like nationalist parties with a strong concentration in key regions. Hence, for example, in the 1993 Canadian elections the Progressive Conservatives won 16.1 percent of the vote but suffered a chronic meltdown to only two MPs.

  2. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    regarded competition between people as natural and desirable. To illustrate this point, Blair explicitly explained the New Labour government's position about competition at Global Borrowers and Investors Forum Conference in 2000, "If stability is the pre-requisite for investment, competition is the driving force.

  1. Who would you vote for?

    out of the big three parties, they have the most green leaning policies that seem achievable and not too compromising.

  2. Notes on Citizenship and Democracy.

    This type of democracy changed to what we know today as Representative Democracy in which all the citizens of 18 years and older can choose their representative party after they give us their policies. 1. The representative party is chosen by majority rule, but on the assumption that majorities

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work