• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do the events of the British General Strike show that Britain was a genuinely conservative society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do the events of the British General Strike show that Britain was a genuinely conservative society? Indeed it could be said that the failure of the general strike and resultantly any real change proves that Britain in 1926 was a conservative society, but others would argue that it wasn't that the British people wanted change, it was just that the government and the elites didn't. Before we can begin to answer this question firstly we have to understand the exact meaning of the word conservative. I have found the meaning to be as follows; "Tending toward maintaining traditional and proven views, conditions and intuitions, favouring the preservation of established customs, values etc and opposing innovation". Firstly we will take the approach of the coal owners in the events leading up to, and, during the period of the general strike. I think that that it was clear from the start of the whole fiasco that the coal owners were reluctant toward change. ...read more.

Middle

I think that the TUC supported the strike because they knew that the working conditions that the miners had to endure were very poor and felt sorry for them, this coupled with the fact the miners were underpaid especially as the coal owners received huge profits from the war which the TUC saw as unjust and therefore sought to change this. I think that in general the British workers wanted change, but they did more than that, they actively supported change as well. The evidence for this was clear from their support that they gave by not going to work during the strike. The fact that they didn't go to work helped the miners cause greatly because it mean that it put both the government and the coal owners under pressure as it wasn't only the mines that this strike affected now it was the whole country and therefore the government would be more keen to resolve the matter. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion I think that it was not necessarily that Britain as a whole was conservative, but that they people that had the real power to influence the events of the general strike didn't want the change. I believe that the majority of the British public wanted change, they wanted the miners to have better working conditions, better pay and less working hours, it was just that the government didn't. They printed articles saying that the "general strike was a direct challenge to parliament" which made people believe that the general strike was a bad thing, thus, meaning that the general strike lost public support and without that their efforts were worthless. The employers wouldn't and couldn't give their employees more because the price of coal had decreased dramatically meaning that they were getting less money anyway let alone giving their employees a pay rise. All of these factors meant that the general strike failed, thus creating the notion that Britain didn't really want change anyway and is a genuinely conservative society. ?? ?? ?? ?? Matthew Goodwin ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The British Suffragette movement.

    a Liberal Government, if returned, give votes to women?"-to which they received no reply. Roughly ejected from the building, both women were charged with disorderly conduct and, as planned, chose imprisonment rather than pay a fine. The women's cause suddenly became newsworthy, in a way that had never happened before, as the press covered the story.

  2. The Causes of the General Strike 1926.

    Some ministers, including Churchill, felt that accepting the Trade Union Congress' conditions would show a weak government. Baldwin could certainly have done more to avoid a General Strike because the Trade Union Congress clearly did not want one and were extremely willing to compromise.

  1. Citizenship - participating in society

    In the slideshow I talked about the following: 1. What is inside a cigarette? 2. A cigarette in general 3. Chemicals that are found in a cigarette 4. Why do people smoke? 5. What does smoking do to your body? 6. What happens to your Lungs when you smoke? 7.

  2. What Where Causes And Consequences Of The General Strike In 1926?

    The mine owners made it clear that if the miners did not agree to the new terms then they would lock the miners out In response to this on 1st May, the Trade Union Congress announced a General Strike to take place on 3rd May.

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    in the mines to make the job easier, but after the war, Britain owed much money to the US and could not afford to buy any luxuries for their own mines. The mines in Britain were old, and mining was a long and tiring job, as most of the coal

  2. Agenda for change

    are if you look at the previous changes that have been brought about (e.g. Hospital league tables) have not really helped the organisation in any way but instead it has hindered its effort in putting patients above everything else. Doctors set great store by doing their best for patients without the constraints of waiting lists targets or balance sheets.

  1. The conflict may be classified as a strike for power between Taliban government and ...

    According to the US State Department's report, Patterns of Global Terrorism, 1999, the epicenter of global terrorism has shifted from the Middle East to South Asia, with a major threat emanating from Afghanistan. 10 It is in the context of political and military turmoil; economic, social, security and environmental degradation; lack of international policy that the conflict took place.

  2. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    strengthen their own leadership and in view of Singapore's continuing economic success a transfer of power in Singapore today seems as remote as ever. 2. The Definition of "Asian Values" Many have stressed the problem for a clear definition of "Asian values" as the discussion easily becomes politicized and a serious argument becomes difficult to be made.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work