• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do the events of the British General Strike show that Britain was a genuinely conservative society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do the events of the British General Strike show that Britain was a genuinely conservative society? Indeed it could be said that the failure of the general strike and resultantly any real change proves that Britain in 1926 was a conservative society, but others would argue that it wasn't that the British people wanted change, it was just that the government and the elites didn't. Before we can begin to answer this question firstly we have to understand the exact meaning of the word conservative. I have found the meaning to be as follows; "Tending toward maintaining traditional and proven views, conditions and intuitions, favouring the preservation of established customs, values etc and opposing innovation". Firstly we will take the approach of the coal owners in the events leading up to, and, during the period of the general strike. I think that that it was clear from the start of the whole fiasco that the coal owners were reluctant toward change. ...read more.

Middle

I think that the TUC supported the strike because they knew that the working conditions that the miners had to endure were very poor and felt sorry for them, this coupled with the fact the miners were underpaid especially as the coal owners received huge profits from the war which the TUC saw as unjust and therefore sought to change this. I think that in general the British workers wanted change, but they did more than that, they actively supported change as well. The evidence for this was clear from their support that they gave by not going to work during the strike. The fact that they didn't go to work helped the miners cause greatly because it mean that it put both the government and the coal owners under pressure as it wasn't only the mines that this strike affected now it was the whole country and therefore the government would be more keen to resolve the matter. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion I think that it was not necessarily that Britain as a whole was conservative, but that they people that had the real power to influence the events of the general strike didn't want the change. I believe that the majority of the British public wanted change, they wanted the miners to have better working conditions, better pay and less working hours, it was just that the government didn't. They printed articles saying that the "general strike was a direct challenge to parliament" which made people believe that the general strike was a bad thing, thus, meaning that the general strike lost public support and without that their efforts were worthless. The employers wouldn't and couldn't give their employees more because the price of coal had decreased dramatically meaning that they were getting less money anyway let alone giving their employees a pay rise. All of these factors meant that the general strike failed, thus creating the notion that Britain didn't really want change anyway and is a genuinely conservative society. ?? ?? ?? ?? Matthew Goodwin ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The Causes of the General Strike 1926.

    Some ministers, including Churchill, felt that accepting the Trade Union Congress' conditions would show a weak government. Baldwin could certainly have done more to avoid a General Strike because the Trade Union Congress clearly did not want one and were extremely willing to compromise.

  2. The British Suffragette movement.

    Although most accounts condemned the militant action, letters of sympathy were also published, and new recruits flowed into the WSPU. From now on, heckling of politicians and a willingness to go to prison became key tactics used by "suffragettes", as WSPU members became known, in their campaign to force the government to give women the vote.

  1. Citizenship - participating in society

    What happens to your Lungs when you smoke? 7. 8 good reasons to stop smoking 8. Why do young people smoke? 9. Facts on smoking. The PowerPoint presentation was an important part of the lesson and was very structured. I chose to create a PowerPoint presentation because I knew young child find reading text boring so I came up with the solution of creating a slideshow.

  2. Agenda for change

    While managers on the other hand, must balance the books and strive to achieve targets set by the governments. Because of this doctors feel as if they are having to work in ways that compromises their values. This causes deep distress, hence more and more doctors are joining private organisations

  1. The conflict may be classified as a strike for power between Taliban government and ...

    The Taliban refusal to deal with the existing warlords whose rivalries had caused so much killing and destruction, stamping out corruption, restoring peace and allowing commerce to flourish again earned them respect.11 On the other hand, they soon imposed the strictest interpretations of Islamic law and custom.

  2. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    The concept of individual rights has solely developed in the West and in China social relations were derived from family relations. Most researchers of Late Imperial China have noted this clear distinction between the interpretation of laws in the society in Anglo-Saxon societies and Chinese societies.

  1. Strategic Execution Illustrated by the Waging modern war book by General Wesley K. Clark.

    As GEN Clark mentions "As NATO tried to muster leverage against Milosevic in the months before the ethnic cleansing reached a point that conflict became inevitable, our own deep-seated ambivalence vitiated our policies".3 (419) The focus was on compromise within an undefined plan.

  2. What Where Causes And Consequences Of The General Strike In 1926?

    This was unrealistic as the report made suggestions which neither party were willing to agree to. So the report was no help to the situation at all and the conflict returned to the same position as before the government intervened.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work