• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree that cohabitation has made for a weaker President but a more balanced system of government?

Extracts from this document...


Ian Bishop Do you agree that cohabitation has made for a weaker President but a more balanced system of government? The constitution of the French Fifth Republic, as with most constitutions, was drawn up in the light of previous experience. Thus its authors sought to accommodate governments constituted form relatively unstable coalitions through the creation of new institutional glue in the form of reformed parliamentary procedure, greater executive powers, an overseeing Constitutional Council and a supervisory President. Within this framework, it was assumed that it would fall to the President to benignly observe events and intervene to protect the country from the dangers of instability associated with weak coalition government. However, the evolution of the French constitution soon belied this image of the President. With the institution of direct election to the office of President, the legitimacy of the office holder was affirmed, and thus allowed successive Presidents to develop the presidential role as they saw fit. As long as a President could command a majority of the votes in Parliament on the basis of a majority of votes won in general elections, he had the political legitimacy to interpret the constitutional role of the President. This process continued for some twenty-eight years , and in France it seemed that the electorate had come to accept the logic of a strong President aided by a parliamentary majority. This trend shaped the evolution of the Constitution, making it difficult to answer in constitutional terms what would happen in the absence of a majority. ...read more.


During periods of cohabitation the President remains a key figure in French political life. He maintains his crucial role as head of state, and the dignity which accompanies this role is by no means diminished in periods of cohabitation. The power of the President in foreign and defence matters remains great, and his assent is still required to make law. The great importance of Presidential elections demonstrates well how the Presidency remains a core component in the French Political system, and the parties still seek the office of President above all else. In periods of cohabitation, the executive effectiveness of the President and his staff is obviously weakened. In the first period of cohabitation the staff of the President were excluded from close contact with the ministries1. In the second period of cohabitation this deliberate limitation was less evident, but the effectiveness of the Elys�e was still limited. It is important to differentiate in this way between the three cohabitations. The different circumstances surrounding each of them, and the varying political climate of the day shaped the nature of the different cohabitations in distinct ways. In the first cohabitation of 1986 - 1988 the concept was a new one, and no one was entirely sure how the system might continue to function. The strong left-right animosities of the period led to a particularly adversarial atmosphere between the Prime Minister and the President. In contrast, the latest and current cohabitation of 1997 has seen not only the full acceptance of cohabitation as a norm of the French political system, but also a more co-operative relationship between President and Prime Minister. ...read more.


The continuation of stable government with strong leadership throughout the majority of the 1990s has demonstrated that the President can still take a very active lead in politics, and the advent of cohabitative governments is not a precursor to a decline in Presidential power in France. In conclusion, the advent of cohabitation has made weakness in the Presidency more easily noticeable. In effect, a cohabitative government is a structural manifestation of a weak President who has at least not fully convinced the electorate of the validity of his programme. However, the President is not rendered impotent by cohabitation, and rather than in indictment of the office of the President, a cohabitation represents a constitutional shot off the bows from the electorate. The President has not been robbed of his ability to exercise strong executive power, but he has lost the ability to do so when the public do not endorse his parliamentary party. The system of government as a whole, if not made more balanced by the occurrence of cohabitation has certainly become more constitutionally aware in nature as a result. Increased faith in, and attention to the wording of the Constitution of the Fifth Republic has been a result of cohabitation, and the way in which the constitution has so well risen to the challenge is in itself a factor that has contributed to stability and balance in the French political system. 1 Ministerial staff were instructed by the Prime Minister to refuse telephone calls from the Elys�e, since all contact was to be routed through the Prime Minister's office. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. British Government and the Constitution "Government without a Constitution is power without a right."

    Where is the Monarchy in this line-up? Relegated to tasks of customary procedure and proffering titles. In 1973, Britain joined Europe. Could this be seen as obtaining a constitution to rule by? Perhaps so, and also, perhaps, a good thing, could Federalism be a chance for true communism to reinstate its humane and moral veracity?

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Yet at the same time if the electorate becomes divided between three or four parties competing nation-wide, the disproportionality of the electoral system becomes far harder to justify. Smaller parties which consistently come second or third are harshly penalised. Rather than majoritarian governments, advocates of proportional systems argue that other

  1. To what extent has Germany's party system evolved from a multi-party system to a ...

    Unknowns were thrown into the equation as nobody could predict how an extra twelve million voters would choose to vote. The elections that took place in December 1990 showed initial signs of further fragmentation which was epitomised through the materialization of the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS).

  2. Parliamentary government and Presidential government

    In general, however, its aims are: 1. to contribute to the formulation of policy and legislation by constructive criticism; 2. to oppose the government proposals it considers objectionable; to seek amendments to government Bills; and 3.

  1. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    Kalashona survived the ordeal only to be hounded by the army since she had made public the crime committed to her. She has also been disowned by her own husband is now having to live in the jungle because she can find no one who would give her work.

  2. The United States uses a presidential system of government and is a stable democracy; ...

    A major advantage of presidential government is said to be that separation of powers means limited government "...an indispensable protection of individual liberty against government 'tyranny'." (Lijphart: 12) With the constitution and the fact after 1851 any president was limited to two terms in office, all providing vital checks and balances so dictatorship cannot arise.

  1. The Advent of Imperialism

    The races of Africa it has been possible to regard as savages or children, "backward" in their progress along the same general road of civilisation in which Anglo-Saxondom represents the vanguard, and requiring the help of more forward races. It is not so easy to make a specious case for

  2. Was the Provisional Government fatally weakened from the first? Notes

    Lenin wrote of them as 'those despicable socialists who have sold out to the government. Some individuals within the PG had misgivings about continuing the war, but at no time did the government as a body contemplate withdrawing from the war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work