• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree that labour was "betrayed" by Ramsay MacDonald in 1931?

Extracts from this document...


Do you agree that labour was "betrayed" by Ramsay MacDonald in 1931? There were many problems faced by Ramsay MacDonald which, forced him to resign however, in this essay I will be discussing whether he betrayed the labour government. This essay will be broken down in to five main bullet points which will all sum up to answer the question above. The main problems faced by Ramsay MacDonald was economic and also the minority position. Ramsay MacDonald's government was opposed by the liberals and so as a result Ramsay MacDonald had to do something, a deal was struck with the Liberals that they would not stand against each other in by-elections leading up to 1914. Ramsay MacDonald was a double, meaning that he under took two positions in the labour party they were: Foreign Secretary and also the prime minister of England, however several years later he didn't want to do the "double" job again so he suggested that the labour government should appoint a man who he Knew, J.H. Thomas. This never happened because a man called Arthur Henderson insisted that he would take no post other than being Foreign Secretary, Ramsay MacDonald had to appoint him because of "the claims of such ...read more.


In European affairs, Henderson was more significant, and he too got pleasure from substantial success, thus like this diplomatic relations were continued. As I had written earlier on in the essay the unemployment predicament was solved by introducing benefits and also decreasing hours worked. I think other viable policies were scrapped, for example when Mosley wanted to introduce his idea it was, "to see protective tariffs to restrict imports, a greater use of credit to provide public works and promote expansion, more government direction of industry to promote rationalization and efficiency, and increased pensions and allowances to boost domestic consumption and encourage earlier retirement". Moseley's idea was scrapped because people didn't want to spend money at a time of crisis. This shows that there were other viable policies but they weren't considered. Taking in to account that other policies were viable and the aims of the labour government I still believe that Ramsay MacDonald didn't betray labour because he tackled the problems faced and also helped Britain establish a consensus with other countries such as America. Ramsay MacDonald had his personal responsibility towards economic strategy, he told everyone his strategy of socialism as a visionary faith, and he said this in a speech against Moseley who wanted the labour government to use his idea of spending more money. ...read more.


of him and made Henderson in charge thus showing that Ramsay MacDonald wasn't in charge it was the cabinet people who disagreed with his actions. I don't think Ramsay MacDonald was concerned with his own future because, if he was he would have tried to please the majority of the cabinet ministers, "there is no evidence that he had planned his actions long in advance". I believe Ramsay MacDonald was a very trust worthy guy and not "the Lucifer of the left" and I also consider him to have thought about the nation as a whole and not about his future in the government, he didn't betray the labour government but simply did what he thought was best for Britain. Taking into consideration all five of the bullet points I have come to a conclusion that Ramsay MacDonald did not betray the labour government "he simply felt that the party- or rather the nine cabinet ministers who refused to accept cuts in unemployment benefit- were betraying the nation". This shows that Ramsay was thinking of the nation all the time and not himself. Thus, this shows that Ramsay MacDonald did not betray the labour government but it was the other way around, they betrayed him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    tolerant legislation and the party was ultimately destroyed over the Repeal of the Corn Law Act. The party divided into protectionist (Old Tories) and Peelites (New Tories). This period saw the birth of the hatred between Gladstone (Peelites) and Disraeli (Protectionist)

  2. How far do you agree that it was Cavour's diplomacy rather that Garibaldi's ideas ...

    National unification was achievable only through the cooperation of the two elements - The Monarchy and the Revolution... (Garibaldi) dictatorial by nature neither understood nor respected the prosaic working of a constitutional regime ' 21 Garibaldi himself recognised there was tension between himself and Cavour.

  1. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    Therefore the "melting pot" idea was rejected outright and the different cultures were supposed to be equally important (Kong, 1990). In 1972 Lee made the assessment that a majority of ethnic Chinese in Singapore now felt more as Singaporean than as Chinese but that "a portion can still be manipulated" by the Chinese communists (Kwang, Fernandez and Tan, 1998, p.

  2. Did Ramsay MacDonald betray his party in 1931?

    This must have embarrassed the labour government, as their leader seemed to hold no faith in them. It seemed they'd been abandoned. They felt that he'd become "...a vain and snobbish social climber..." He had already become a part of London's 'High Society.'

  1. Peel betrayed his party and was an unsuccessful leader'? To what extent do you ...

    His intellect and strength of character ensured that his new party adapted successfully to the industrializing society of the 1840s in Britain. It was essential that the bigoted and outdated views were put to one side and that a new and stronger party emerged from the disaster of the Reform crisis.

  2. Did the Labour Party show that it could govern Britain competently in the years ...

    In February 1924 there was a national dock strike for higher wages which ended in success for the workers, but MacDonald had been planning to use troops to unload ships had it continued. The following month he proclaimed a state of emergency during a London tram and bus strike.

  1. How far do Sources A-G support the view that Ramsay MacDonald deserves to be ...

    It seems that the eventual idea of cuts was seen as a last resort after the Labour MPs had rejected any other policy. It is difficult to see how MacDonald could be seen as a betrayer at this point. It would also seem that in fact the MPs were the

  2. Was the 2nd Labour Government betrayed by Ramsey McDonald in 1931?

    The following day, McDonald informed cabinet colleagues that the Labour government was at an end and that an emergency National government would take its place. Snowden was involved and McDonald would still be prime minister, at request of the King.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work