Economic Changes after the 1949 Communist Revolution in China

Authors Avatar

Economic Changes

Agriculturally, wars had left people starving, the rents were high and the lack of production meant that people could not be paid.  During the Civil War, Mao noticed how peasants were willing to co-operate as long as the benefits were obvious to them.  Mao aimed to up food production and prevent starvation by introducing the Agrarian Reform Law in 1950.  This involved sending out communist cadres to survey land and classify the villagers on a social scale from landlord through “rich”, “middle” and “poor” peasants down to landless labourers.  Debts were immediately cancelled and rents reduced.

Then came the transfer of surplus land from the top two categories, to the bottom two; leaving the former gentry families with just enough to live on. The situation of most middle families was unchanged.  For millions of downtrodden peasants, the land reform was the heart of the Chinese Revolution. This was the moment when the peasants stood up to face their own personal enemy, the landlord.  Land reform at last fulfilled Sun Yatsen’s goal of “Land to the Tiller”. But, despite the fairness of the original share out, differences of wealth and status would soon increase as, larger or harder working families bought up neighbouring land.  It was also essential to increase agricultural output, and the government believed this could only be achieved by pooling the peasants labour, tools and animals, in larger farming units where machinery and new farming methods could be introduced.  Peasants were not forced but gently coaxed into co-operative farming.  First mutual aid teams were formed, with seven to ten households sharing their tools, labour and draught animals whilst working each families land separately.  More money was earned from extra crops produced; it was then shared out according to how much work was done by each person.  Some arguments arose over whose land was to be farmed first, but overall production did increase, however, not quickly enough to satisfy the demand.  A peasant in south china told an American visitor about mutual aid teams

“Our team is made up of seven families, all poor peasants and before that farm labourers.  We faced a shortage of labour during the busy seasons and were too poor to afford hired help.  We were also short of farm tools and to poor to buy fertilizer…so we set up our mutual aid team.  We pooled our labour and farm tools for common use.  Every family started to collect fertilizer, solving that problem.  The autumn crop was a bumper one, and we had surplus grain to buy tools and fertilizer.  This year we plan to start breeding pigs and hens and reclaim some waste land to increase our crop area.”        

The next step was to set up lower stage co-operatives of thirty to forty households, in which the land was collectively farmed but still individually owned and profits were accordingly shared.

In 1953 this went another step forward to higher stage co-operatives.  These consisted of 200 to 300 families, usually the people of a group of villages.  The big difference between these and the lower stage co-operatives was that families were not paid rent for the use of their land.  They received only wages for labour.  They had to surrender the title deeds to their land, their equipment and their animals to the co-operative.  They were allowed to keep only a few square metres for their personal use.  This they used for growing vegetables or raising chickens.  The peasants were forcefully encouraged, many unhappy peasants ended up joining.

 

By the end of 1954, 95% of peasant families had joined higher stage co-operatives.  Food was shared out equally, not according to how much work had been done, so harder working families did less because they couldn’t see the point in doing more work than others.  Most of the 300 million peasants who had received land in 1950 were therefore landless again.  Food production almost doubled but this was still not as good as expected, this might have been because of poor weather.  In some areas there was no rain, in others there were floods.  Millions of people left their villages and went to live in the cities.  Production increase meant more money, however 80% of surplus food was sold to the government at very low fixed prices.  This meant that the farmers had little reason to try to produce more food.  By the end of the five-year plan in 1957 Chinas industrial production had increased by 120%.  Food production was only up by 25%.

Join now!

In setting up co-operatives and ending private ownership of the land, the Chinese government was following soviet example.  However, the position of the USSR after the Russian revolution (1917) and Chinas position in the 1950 were very different.  Russian peasants had been forced into collective farms so that farm machines could be used and fewer peasants would be needed on the land.  The Russian peasants were no longer needed on the farms and went of to the cities where more workers were needed to build the USSR’ industries.  In china there were very few machines to use on the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay