• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Electoral reform: Following the 2005 general election is it time for the government to consider electoral reform

Extracts from this document...


Electoral reform: Following the 2005 general election is it time for the government to consider electoral reform During the run up to the 1997 general election the Labour party used electoral reform as a central campaigning issue; subsequently they broke 18 years of conservative rule and became the majority party. However after the election had taken place electoral reform slipped way down the policy ladder, the labour party did set up something called 'the Jenkins committee' however they then chose not to implement any of the reforms said committee recommended. Now in British politics the only major party that still supports electoral reform is the Liberal Democrats, and because of the manner in which the voting system is structured they have no serious chance of getting into power any time soon. Therefore the balance of probability is that electoral reform will not even be discussed until something radical happens under the current system, most likely that it fails to produce a satisfactory result, however just because the issue is not going to be discussed until some time in the future it doesn't necessarily mean that reform is not needed pleasantly. ...read more.


The current the current electoral system is also can't be called representative of the opinions of the country. At the 2005 election only 24% of the British public eligible to vote voted for the labour government that we now have, however Tony Blain can still claim to be ruling with a mandate. Another major problem with the constituency based system we have currently is that many MPs will be more influenced by what there party say than but the people in there constituency who elect them. An elected MP can be dismissed from his party if he refuses to vote with them on a three line whip even if he doesn't agree with the decision, this leads to some MPs not always having the needs of the people who elected them in the front of there mind. Another factor that should be taken into account is that electoral reform has been approved by a government body; the Jenkins commission that the labour party set up concluded that reforms should happen in the electoral system, the people in the committee are probably ...read more.


Some might view this as a good thing since the government are often more educated in the affairs of state than the public and therefore should be able to do things the public don't like, however others might claim that since the government rules with a mandate form the public the soul priority of the government should be to do what the electorate demand. In the end however I feel the most convincing argument against electoral reform is the fact that our current system works, and is continuing to put the party who gained the highest proportion of votes into power with a decent majority, and many people would say that until the current system fails we should not seek to sabotage it through passing reforms for the sake of improving the possession of the smaller parties. My personal opinion is that a strong government is better for the country than a 'fair' one, electoral reform will be forced to come about when it is necessary and probably not before. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Define and discuss an autocratic system of government - While most essays are likely ...

    these have 'considerably narrowed the scope of democracy'.6 It is here where Munro-Kua inquires the authoritarian qualities of the Malaysian government and poses the question: "To what extent can the scope of democracy be widened...?"7 The response to this may begin by acknowledging that with the elements of direct popular

  2. Why did Labour lose the 1951 General Election?

    Gaitskell had imposed upon the health service prescription charges for glasses and false teeth, which to Bevan and other NHS idealists represented the betrayal of NHS founding principals. This split was a key moment in the demise of Attlee's government.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    450 seats were single-seat constituencies elected on a first-past-the-post basis; the other 225 were filled by proportional representation, with parties and blocs receiving seats according to the proportion of votes they won nationally. In those constituencies, voters cast two votes: one for a local candidate and another vote for one

  2. Free essay

    Consider the view that the liberal government reforms 1906-1914 were more concerned with the ...

    Apart from the fact the Liberals lost seats to Labour in a by election a year before, sitting in government were a vast amount of miner Mps15. It was the Labour of Exchange act(1909), however, that really stood out. In working class areas Liberal M.P's were fearful of losing seats to labour M.Ps.

  1. 'Personal and party advantages were the motivating forces for the passing of the 1867 ...

    After 1846 they were mocked by the Whigs as 'the conservative party with the brains knocked out'. Their belief in protectionism was seen as out of date, yet this was their only distinct policy. There was great rivalry between Disraeli and Gladstone, both obviously the rising stars of their respective groups, and very ambitious.

  2. Should the UK reform its system for General Elections?

    However, though many may think we have a choice in a General Election, often it is limited. Firstly, when voting, a voter may choose only from the list they are given. The party chooses the candidate for that constituency. This means a voter may wish the party to be in power, but not the candidate representing the party.

  1. A critical analysis of selected election literature and party political broadcasts from the general ...

    You get the impression from the style and words used in the writing that this party is very ahead of its time. It makes out that its morals will one day be considered standard, but that day will be too late.

  2. Decentralization and development of modern local government systems in Eastern Europe

    Such a clear and original form of privatization is called "raw," referring to the fact that, at first, only a restriction in the extent of public responsibilities arises. This technique-in which the state leaves a public sector-is not unknown in foreign practice.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work