• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Electoral reform: Following the 2005 general election is it time for the government to consider electoral reform

Extracts from this document...


Electoral reform: Following the 2005 general election is it time for the government to consider electoral reform During the run up to the 1997 general election the Labour party used electoral reform as a central campaigning issue; subsequently they broke 18 years of conservative rule and became the majority party. However after the election had taken place electoral reform slipped way down the policy ladder, the labour party did set up something called 'the Jenkins committee' however they then chose not to implement any of the reforms said committee recommended. Now in British politics the only major party that still supports electoral reform is the Liberal Democrats, and because of the manner in which the voting system is structured they have no serious chance of getting into power any time soon. Therefore the balance of probability is that electoral reform will not even be discussed until something radical happens under the current system, most likely that it fails to produce a satisfactory result, however just because the issue is not going to be discussed until some time in the future it doesn't necessarily mean that reform is not needed pleasantly. ...read more.


The current the current electoral system is also can't be called representative of the opinions of the country. At the 2005 election only 24% of the British public eligible to vote voted for the labour government that we now have, however Tony Blain can still claim to be ruling with a mandate. Another major problem with the constituency based system we have currently is that many MPs will be more influenced by what there party say than but the people in there constituency who elect them. An elected MP can be dismissed from his party if he refuses to vote with them on a three line whip even if he doesn't agree with the decision, this leads to some MPs not always having the needs of the people who elected them in the front of there mind. Another factor that should be taken into account is that electoral reform has been approved by a government body; the Jenkins commission that the labour party set up concluded that reforms should happen in the electoral system, the people in the committee are probably ...read more.


Some might view this as a good thing since the government are often more educated in the affairs of state than the public and therefore should be able to do things the public don't like, however others might claim that since the government rules with a mandate form the public the soul priority of the government should be to do what the electorate demand. In the end however I feel the most convincing argument against electoral reform is the fact that our current system works, and is continuing to put the party who gained the highest proportion of votes into power with a decent majority, and many people would say that until the current system fails we should not seek to sabotage it through passing reforms for the sake of improving the possession of the smaller parties. My personal opinion is that a strong government is better for the country than a 'fair' one, electoral reform will be forced to come about when it is necessary and probably not before. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Minority parties in Britain call for electoral reform whereas the two major parties tend ...

    of the popular vote (Jones & Kavanagh, 1990) due to the anomalies of the FPTP system. Utilising a PR system would mean that Labour would have held 39% of the seats in the House of Commons, with representatives of the other parties making up the other 61% of seats based on the percentage of the votes they each received.

  2. 'Personal and party advantages were the motivating forces for the passing of the 1867 ...

    radical reform bill in 1867 than the Liberal bill which they opposed in 1866. Many modern historians have looked to the theory that it was purely for personal and party advantages. To Derby and Disraeli it seemed clear that if the issue of reform could be kept alive it would

  1. Why did Labour lose the 1951 General Election?

    organisational preparations for upcoming elections were hampered, and the electoral machine was disarmed. Thirdly, it brought about a further drop in voter confidence as external signs of infighting brought into question the competence and clarity of direction Labour could offer.

  2. Free essay

    Consider the view that the liberal government reforms 1906-1914 were more concerned with the ...

    and working with a young civil servant William Beveridge, developed a new scheme to deal with these issues. The Labour Exchanges act (1909), was one half of the plan that Churchill personally saw go through. All throughout the country Labour Exchanges were set up.

  1. Electoral Reform

    For example in the 1983 general election, the Liberal Democrats received 25.4% of the total votes cast and received only 23 seats, whereas Labour only received 2.2% more votes but got 209 seats in parliament. That's over nine times the amount of seats for only 2% more of the total vote.

  2. The need for reform

    Lloyd George and Churchill felt inspired to introduce similar style reforms in Britain. 'Gas and water socialism' Public works schemes to improve living conditions and public health had been established in the late 19th century, often set up and run by Liberals.

  1. Should the 1997 general election be viewed as a 'critical election'?

    Along with this problem was the fact that the Conservative party had to now battle against a new and improved Labour government which had changed its ideology, and which was rapidly becoming the peoples party. John Major now had the problem of having to do battle with Tony Blair who

  2. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    Marxists believe in a complete equality, what can create a much fairer society, in non-competitive way of life when everyone could be able to see the benefits (a rather utopian state). As they state that capitalism produces vast inequalities in society, they believe that the workers should get rid of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work