• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the Considerable Difference in the Relationship of West European Constitutional Courts and National Political Institutions.

Extracts from this document...


West European Politics December 2002 Explain the Considerable Difference in the Relationship of West European Constitutional Courts and National Political Institutions. The issue of the constitution, judiciary and constitutional courts have been discussed in much detail over the past few decades; in fact they have taken particularly contentious areas of debate after the Second World War. A Constitutional Court is the institution that upholds the constitution and has the authority to carry out constitutional reviews. Western Europe in particular has adopted the Kelsen model for review. The European structures of constitutional review I will overview are all based on this model laid out by Hans Kelsen. The four features of this model are 1) monopoly by the constitutional courts on constitutional review 2) restriction on the role of these courts 3) courts with only necessary contact with the judiciary and the legislative 4) permission for a priori abstract reviews. Kelsen's model works to prevent legislative supremacy and this is suitable for Western Europe and its culture. Review in Western Europe is different from the judicial review process in say the USA; it implies either abstract review or concrete review. Abstract review involves deliberation over a law or laws without any specific case in mind. Usually it can be split into two categories: 'a priori' (review only before a bill becomes law) ...read more.


In reality this means the majority of the judges are former Parliamentarians. As in Italy, judicial review is banned in France; once a bill is passed its constitutionality cannot be questioned. Therefore concrete review is not allowed, a priori abstract review however is when either the President of the Senate/National Assembly or when sixty or more senators/deputies refer something. Germany, Italy and France each have a court therefore, which will produce different relationships with political institutions in their respective nations. Stone Sweet explains the cultural and historical reason for these differences: "In Europe...a deep hostility towards judges has reigned over for most of the last two centuries, the delegation of powers to judiciaries has been viewed as a necessary evil" (Stone Sweet, WEP Jan 2001, 78). The notion of parliamentary supremacy was regarded as being more essential because in a democracy this is the bastion of popular sovereignty and general will. This was especially a strong sentiment in France. The state has always been unitary and not federal like Germany or regional like Italy, there is also history of weak local government. A need for a Constitutional council was not marketed because the government felt it needed a check and balance procedure in place. Conversely, the Council was intended for quite the opposite reason: "The Gaullists replaced the British-style parliamentary system with a mixed presidential-parliamentary one, strengthening the executive," (Stone Sweet, WEP, 85). ...read more.


Also their forms of abstract and concrete review has made the FCC a more diverse and significant institution. "In Western Europe parliamentary regimes, focus is typically on political parties and the ties and tensions they present between the Parliament and the executive ... these theories assume that the crucial actions in parliamentary systems occur on a continuum running from legislative to executive, but that view ignores a broader set of relationships among Parliament, the executive and the Constitutional Court" [Volcansek, EJPR 2001, 348]. Now I have compared the roles of the Constitutional Courts in Germany, France and Italy, and viewed their relationships with the major political institutions in their respective countries. After the Second World War, the importance of having a strong constitution was emphasised throughout Western Europe. And in particular the need for a separate constitutional body to check the executive branch was deemed essential in those countries transitioning to liberal democracies. This is why the FCC in Germany and the ICC in Italy have a greater duty to uphold the value of the Constitution in their nations. The cultural perspective, as well as the historical one, helps to explain why each of the countries has chosen to adopt slightly different versions of the Kelsen model. Emergence of the Constitutional Courts throughout Western Europe has impacted on the role of the executive and the legislative. Their powers have been limited in some cases and in other cases law-making policies have been given much more thought and consideration. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Britain has a constitutional monarchy. The 'constitutional monarchy' is in which the monarch acknowledges ...

    Basically, the democracy means the power in people's hand. In most democracy-developed country, these powers are placed on the legislative (the parliament) and the elected head of state that can represent the people's view. However, these powers are all put under the Queen's title in Britain, which the House of Lords recently assumed that the Queen was born to be.

  2. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    Three Hill Women's groups had brought Kalashona Chakma along with other victims of the surrounding villages for a Press Conference at Dhaka. After long months of deliberation they had decided to take the risk and make this journey to seek justice for themselves.

  1. Why is corruption so prominent in the contemporary Latin American political scene?

    dramatically in Paraguay, no doubt influenced by the lack of strong government and by individual personal greed which has been displayed by many Latin American political leaders. (23) Increasingly Paraguayan politics began to resemble a sultanistic style of politics that can be seen to have strengthened political corruption; its legacy continues to exist in Paraguay today and fuels corruption.

  2. This assignment identifies and discusses the major social and political trends expected to affect ...

    More than 54% of people lived in urban areas. The 2001 Census showed 44.8 million people in South Africa. Apart from the mortality rates due to HIV/AIDS another important population factor affecting business is the issue of migration. In his article Bukula (1995)

  1. Public Law

    Therefore in conclusion I believe that over recent years there has been quite a significant reduction in the original definition of Parliamentary Supremacy, with its original meaning being slowly eroded away.

  2. Public Law

    EC laws contain many constitutional principles, which are enforceable by the European Court of Justice, and violation of such laws can result in exclusion from the EC, and with it the political bonuses Britain gains from it's membership. This principle has already taken effect in many cases, most famously in

  1. Russia - political past, present and future

    However, the salutary socialistic theory was not applied exactly the way it was meant. The totalitarian Czarist regime shifted into another sort of despotism. Thus, Russia's democracy was far away from Britain's in development. By 1920s Britain already granted the suffrage rights to almost all citizens and more or less developed an efficient government structure.

  2. The Negative Impact Of World War 1 On Italy: Weaknesses Of The Liberal State, ...

    The country was in chaos. Liberalism was more irrelevant than ever as its support base had collapsed in favour of the PSI, PPI and now the Fascists - all parties that had little love for Liberal Italy. Even worse, the Fascist squadrismo increasingly dictated events in some provinces through violence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work