• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Lenin and the Bolsheviks replaced the Provisional Government as leaders of Russia by November 1917.

Extracts from this document...


b) Explain why Lenin and the Bolsheviks replaced the Provisional Government as leaders of Russia by November 1917. A Government - people who collectively decide what is best politically for a country or part of a country. Having a Government is a necessity as they are countries political connections to the rest of the world; they make the major decisions, and try to do what is best for the people living in their country. It is a government that deals with finances, wars, education, problems, health care - and these are just a few of things that they are presented with. On top of everything else, they have to try to make the people that they are 'governing' as content and happy as they can. Sometimes, although there is a government, a country may have a monarch, or someone that has presiding powers. The government, therefore, is there to act as advisors. In Russia this government, or parliament, was called the Duma. For three hundred years, a Tsar predominantly ruled Russia. However, in March 1917, the Tsar, Nicholas II abdicated, leaving Russia without a ruler. So twelve members of the Duma elected themselves to become the Provisional Government - a temporary government that would rule over Russia until a new leader could be found. ...read more.


Life was tough - there was little food or fuel, the war had consumed all of the countries' resources, and on top of all of this, soldiers were leaving the army. Everyone realized that the war had to end. However, it wasn't all as simple as this. In order to keep France and Britain on Russias' side, Russia could not surrender as they had been lent money that would be jeopardized if they decided to surrender. So the war had to continue. This made the Provisional Government increasingly unpopular - workers went on strike and almost refused to obey anything that the Government told them to do. In their eyes they had complete freedom. This was really bad for the Government, but good for Lenin and the Bolsheviks as conditions in Russia deteriorated daily, weakening the people and the government. The majority of people in Russia had already put the blame onto the government, and so needed someone to turn to; someone that would make everything better for them, Lenin was this person. He used all of the sufferings in Russia as part of his campaign, promising them better lives. ...read more.


This increased hatred towards the Provisional Government, on top of their already established unpopularity. As I have previously stated, soldiers were leaving the army in order to return home and claim land, especially after the defeat that Russia suffered at the hands of Kornilov. But there was more: with everything that was going on, all the hatred and unpopularity. All of the problems that Russia was facing politically, economically, socially and on top of that the war that was still continuing, the Provisional Government had to cope with extreme amounts of pressure, that they obviously couldn't handle. However, this was good for the Bolsheviks as the increasing weakness of the Provisional Government, and lack of support gained Lenin and the Bolsheviks more recognition and more support. Also, when Kornilovs' troops tried to attack Petrogard, the people of Petrogard saw the Bolsheivks as heroes, after all it was Lenin and the Bolsheviks that saved them from getting killed, or so it seemed. So in conclusion, each factor caused the Provisional Government to become increasingly unpopular with the public. Each one showed the Provisional Governments' weaknesses, and made the Bolsheviks look like the people of Petrogards' knights in shining armor, there to save them from their depressing and unfortunate lives. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    'First-past-the-post should be replaced as a method of electing political representatives.' Discuss.

    5 star(s)

    they give rise to a parliament of geographical representatives: MPs represent defined areas of cities, towns, or regions rather than just party labels. Many proponents of FPTP argue that true representative accountability depends upon the voters of one area knowing who their own representative is, and having the ability to re-elect, or throw them out, at election time.

  2. Was the provisional government doomed to failure from the beginning

    more settled and happy that their needs would be about to be met. The seizing of power was joint between the Bolsheviks and the Soviet, as one could not achieve it without the other.

  1. How did the failure of the Provisional Government allow for the rise of the ...

    The governmental policies and failure to use force was the main cause for the collapse of the Provisional Government The governmental policies of the Provisional Government were extremely ineffective in making decisions about the implementation of democracy. The liberal view shows that the lack of experience in the new government was the cause of the failure.

  2. "The Provisional Government was overthrown because it decided to continue fighting in World War ...

    The government used the July days to arrest Bolshevik leaders who did not suppress the movement. By this time the Bolsheviks were more powerful than they had ever been after Kornilov's troops refused to fight against the workers of Petrograd in mid 1917.

  1. Critically evaluate/assess the achievements of Sergei Witte and their consequences for the social groups ...

    The most economically and developed industrialion for Russia was the construction of the Trans-Siberian Railway 1891-1904. Railroads were the largest single industry in the country, employing 400,000 people in 1900, and were forcibly transforming other sectors. The metallurgical industries were developing apace, while approximately one-half of all finished metal products were railroad tracks.

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    His effect on legislation was more destructive than constructive but very effective. Despite rejecting his place within parliament it is ironic that De Valera had an almost impervious veto over Irish intended legislation that previous parliamentary Irish leaders could never have achieved from within the system.

  1. To what extents can the events of 1905 in Russia be considered a revolution.

    Like the zemstva in the countryside, there were also the town councils in the towns. They were elected by property owners and taxpayers. The town councils were responsible for the general welfare of the towns. Thus town councils served the same function as the zemstva in providing valuable lessons in

  2. 'Repressive and Unpopular'. Is this a fair assessment of Lord Liverpool's government?

    These government informers encouraged law breaking so that they could collect a reward by informing on the lawbreakers. Although this may have been a bit extreme, it could be argued that any possibility of insurrection was nipped in the bud by a government that recognised the threat to the extent of exaggerating it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work