• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why the 1997 general election is a good example of a dealignment election. Usually throughout British political elections there has been a clear alignment between social groups

Extracts from this document...


Explain why the 1997 general election is a good example of a dealignment election. Usually throughout British political elections there has been a clear alignment between social groups, this alignment however has been somewhat blurred since the 1997 general election. Before the 1997 election most people voted for whomever their families voted for or whichever political party represented their social class the best. The two main parties throughout British politics have been Labour and Conservative, Labour had always represented the working class and the Conservatives had always represented the middle and upper classes. From 1979 when the conservatives won the election with Margaret Thatcher as their leader they were able to hold three successive victories over their opposition, in 1990 John Major took over leadership of the conservative party and won another election in 1992. ...read more.


With the crash of the pound in 1992 the electorate was starting to become more and more open to persuasion by the media in particular. They became more indecisive about which party to vote for and the Labour party took advantage of this. In 1994 Tony Blair took over the leadership of the Labour party and renamed them as New Labour. Labour had changed. With Tony Blair and the front of the New Labour more and more people were turning from the Conservatives. This may be because Tony Blair reminded the people of nothing of Old Labour. He had single handedly changed the party that leads today. "A new Labour, A new Briton" On the first of May 1997 the general election took place that would change the face of British politics. ...read more.


The conservatives only received 25% of the seats despite them winning 31% of the votes. They also lost their seats in Wales and Scotland despite winning 19% and 17% of the vote in these two countries. The Conservatives lost nearly half of their seats while the Liberal Democrats almost doubled their tally from the 1992 general election. The Conservatives also lost all of their seats within inner city areas of England as well. The Conservatives had become the party of rural England rather than a national Election winning force. Labour won the 1997 election with a landslide victory. It is because of these points that it has lead psephologists to believe that there had been a dealignment within the electorates voting behavior in 1997. With the electorates voting behavior becoming more volatile it is anyone's guess who will be in power in the near future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Why did Labour lose the 1951 General Election?

    The 1946 National Health Service Act provided free access to a range of hospital and general practitioner services across the country. The 1946 National Insurance Act was also a key domestic reform of the Attlee government. For the first time, the government provided a catch-all benefits system which hypothecated a

  2. Given Churchill’s popularity in the war, why did he lose the 1945 election?

    Churchill even went as far to say that if Labour were elected it would need to fall back on some kind of Gestapo, "to implement its policies." Ironically the Conservative manifesto, "A declaration of policy to the electors" offered many polices similar to those of Labour.

  1. The causes and the political and social consequences of the Dreyfus Affair in France

    The historians played a creditable role in the Affair. They entered on the public scene as savants, commenting the indictment of Dreyfus that was unscientific grounds. The historians finally took part in the Affair because the opened practise of their knowledge and the feeling of belonging to an intellectual community endowed them with a consciousness of citizenship.

  2. What advice would you give to Labor Leadership in light of the recent research ...

    As part of new labors effort to define the Conservative party they must offer a pleasant contrast to the White Old Rich Male Conservatives. The W.O.R.M. stereotype is designed to perpetuate an image of conservatives as elitists, where self serving decisions are made behind closed doors in smoke filled rooms.

  1. Select And Explain The Most Important Turning Points In Nelson Mandela's Life

    exports to Europe, America and Asia rapidly rose by up to 300%. Many loans were cancelled and firms like Esso and Barclays withdrew a lot of investment from South Africa and the United Kingdom boycotted loans to South Africa. As South Africa's wealth had increased due increased prosperity they gradually became more self- sufficient and inevitably overcame the economic sanctions.

  2. The effect of the three consecutive general elections on the labour party

    Also a rift began to emerge in the party with dispute between the europhiles and europhobes. The country was beginning to suffer due to ms Thatcher's naivety.

  1. Should the 1997 general election be viewed as a 'critical election'?

    Neil Hamilton and the "cash for questions scandal" started to give people the indication that the party couldn't be trusted. Taking money to ask specific questions in Parliament isn't something to make people trust a party. Along with the problems above, throughout the years 1992-1997 the party became divided over

  2. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    An example can be the Attlee government policies trying to reduce inequalities of income, wealth and region. For example, heavily progressive taxation on wages was introduced and an active regional policy "was followed to bolster employment and income in areas of higher than average unemployment, such as the North-East of England"(Jones, 1998, p.25).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work