• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why the government was concerned about the morale (spirit and attitude) of the British people in the autumn of 1940.

Extracts from this document...


Q 4 - Explain why the government was concerned about the morale (spirit and attitude) of the British people in the autumn of 1940 Source E is an extract from a secret report to the government by the Ministry of Information on the 10th of November 1940. The extract describes how during air raids 'people run madly' for shelter from the bombs. It gives a sense of complete bedlam and clearly conveys people are desperate to leave London, the East End, 'mothers and young children hysterical'. It is important to note this report was not published as it was only meant for Governments eyes and use. We could therefore infer perhaps that the source is more reliable in that it was not something which had to be made to suit to get past censorship, it was the truth. Source F is an extract from the diary of Harold Nicholson who new several members of government on the 17th September 1940. The source speaks about the feelings of bitterness in the East End of London, especially towards the Royal Family and how 'everyone is worried'. ...read more.


The final source (G) gives a different opinion to those of the other 2 although it is saying morale is high as is community spirit it does state there was 'widespread fear'. Obviously this is not what the government want - they need people to feel safe in the governments hands and to be reassured war is the best option and Britain has competent leaders who are working the best for peoples safety so they deliver the best quality when they are at work as possible. So why is it the government are concerned about morale? The government relied on the media to lift the moral of the country, otherwise all support for the war would be lost and all the industries that were needed for the war effort would not be able to produce anything without the workers. The government were aware of this which is why they were so concerned about morale. The confidence of the country was important for the vital production of war materials. If the public were depressed and scared of a town or city since it was being bombed they would move. ...read more.


The government reported Dunkirk as a heroic rescue and only reported the positive things about the Blitz, such as brave rescues and how many enemy planes had been shot down. There had also recently occurred the Battle of Britain and German successes in France which had all taken there toll. In conclusion we can now see why public morale on the home front was so important to the government and how the problem was tackled. Events going on affected not only people's spirit but their ability to function too as the sources showed. The government relied on the home front to not only keep themselves going but the ammunitions for the troops coming as well. Basically if it were not for those people there would not be a war at all. Therefore it was vital for the government to keep them on their side. They did this by use of media. The media reinforced community spirit; it made people continue in their everyday struggles. Each person in Britain was convinced they were fighting Hitler in his or her own way. The media was responsible for keeping the public fighting on. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Select And Explain The Most Important Turning Points In Nelson Mandela's Life

    Under apartheid, the black majority was segregated, and was denied political and economic rights equal to those of whites, this had become a distressing daily routine for the Africans.

  2. How does British Airways affect the government?

    would be able to concentrate on the public services sector and make the people happy and increase its support.

  1. Democracy's Biggest Fan Speaks.

    This page explains why I believe that and describes the positive effects on British society that becoming a republic would engender. The reasons do not just revolve around the practical, tangible effects of the monarchy.

  2. The Belfast Blitz.

    restoring the city and saving the lives of its people much easier and successful. Lastly, the most widely acknowledged reason why Belfast suffered so greatly during its bombardments, is the inaction of the Government. The decisions regarding air raid precautions for Northern Ireland were based on a report by J.E Warnock, Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Home Affairs.

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    Meanwhile the pretenders started to surrender, were Russia gave up her claims forever and Ferdinand VI didn't want to put extra pressure on Malta, as he didn't want to fight with Britain, as the latter was crucial in her aid whenever France attacked here.

  2. Use sources E, F and G, and your own knowledge, to explain why the ...

    Over a period of 77 days London was bombed every day except one. Other cities to be bombed included Bristol, Liverpool, Plymouth, Southampton, Manchester, Birmingham, Coventry and Glasgow - all of them ports or industrial centres. The British government was concerned about public morale because the huge fear generated by

  1. In what ways did the British government attempt to hide the effects of the ...

    However all news reels were censored greatly and a lot of propaganda was placed inside to keep the peoples spirits high and to keep them going so that production in the factories, for the soldiers on the frontline, would not slow down.

  2. Is Legalization a Realistic Alternative to the War on Marijuana?

    No one person or governing body has the right to strip someone of their pursuit of happiness or knowledge, especially if that person has done nothing to harm anyone else. "If the government can tell us what we can put into our own bodies, what can it not tell us?"

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work