• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Why The Unionists Won The 'Khaki' Election Of 1900

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain Why The Unionists Won The 'Khaki' Election Of 1900 The Unionist victory in 1900 was basically due to Unionist strength against Liberal incompetence. In September of 1900, Salisbury decided to dissolve Parliament to hold a general election. This was a tactical move, as the government had a majority of 120 and two years left on their current term in office. This is due to the "Septennial Act, which laid down a maximum life of seven years for a Parliament." (Addison) This tactical move by Salisbury was cleverly calculated to occur at the same time as Britain seemed to be doing best in the Second Boer War. As a result, they capitalized on Liberal weakness and apparent Unionist strength to hold office until January 1906. ...read more.

Middle

Combined with this, there is the ineptitude of the Liberal party. The Unionists were currently "united by war" whereas the Liberals were badly divided by it. The Liberals were split three ways into: opponents of the war, Liberal Imperialists and a Centre majority, who accepted the war but felt the Government was too harsh. This would have caused leadership problems and the party would not have been united enough to fight an election campaign. Churchill declared that the Liberal party were "a squabbling, disorganized rabble." This can best be shown by the Pretoria letters which were sent by Liberal figures to wish the British good luck in the war, contrary to the party's beliefs. ...read more.

Conclusion

His comment on the vote for the Liberals shows this. Addison is keen to suggest that Chamberlain was proclaimed as the man that won the election due to his work being integral to the Unionist success. This evidence further reinforces the idea that the Unionists were more dominant than all of the other opposition and therefore deserved to win the election Overall, the election was decisive success for the Unionists. This was due to the fact that they had capitalized on poor organization of the Liberals, foreign successes in the Boers and excellent leadership and campaigning by Salisbury and Chamberlain. They had previous credibility like Hicks and Salisbury from the last election to further enhance their chances but overall these factors proved to be the difference between a Unionist victory and a Liberal defeat. Rob Allen 12THG Page 1 09/05/07 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The Advent of Imperialism

    The effect of this policy, rigorously maintained during the earlier decades of the nineteenth century, was the irreparable ruin of many of the most valuable and characteristic arts of Indian industry. "In India the manufacturing power of the people was stamped out by Protection against her industries, and then Free

  2. Should the 1997 general election be viewed as a 'critical election'?

    actually united and moving in the same direction, unlike the Conservative party which was still divided with European issues. Also the new approach that Tony Blair had introduced, dealing with things in some what of an authoritarian way showed that along with being a charismatic leader, he was also a

  1. Should the 1997 general election be viewed as a 'critical election'?

    Europe was a problem for the Conservatives not only because of how it split the party but the amount of time and energy it took, the party was often criticised for over debating the European issue instead of concerning itself with more pressing domestic issues.

  2. How powerful was Britainin 1900?

    Also due to Britain's large amount of territories it also secured Heliogoland in the North Sea and Cape Colony in South Africa, both from the Dutch; Malta and the Ionian Islands in the Mediterranean which, together with Gibraltar ensured virtual British control of the that Sea; and Ceylon was taken

  1. Lord Salisbury and Palmerston.

    Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria and Rhodesia were the new colonies. In domestic affairs, Salisbury's chief concern was the maintenance of the Union between Great Britain and Ireland. Salisbury was by no means indifferent to the many genuine grievances of the Irish Catholic peasantry against the absentee landlords of the Anglo-Irish Protestant `Ascendancy'.

  2. Apartheid in South Africa.

    IMPORTANT DATES 1488 Portuguese sailors rounded the Cape of Good Hope. The Cape quickly became an important station for European ships en route to Asia. 1652 Dutch settlers founded a colony at Cape Town. The colony soon began expanding north and east.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work