• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'First-past-the-post should be replaced as a method of electing political representatives.' Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Introduction to Politics for Economists - Essay (N0089998) Question 3): "First-past-the-post should be replaced as a method of electing political representatives." Discuss. __________________________________________________________________ Answer: The British electoral system is based on the "First-Past-The-Post" (FPTP) system. This system is also used in the USA, Canada, and India. It is a system in which the 'winner takes all' and usually gives a clear majority both at constituency and national level. This means that a candidate in a constituency only needs one more vote than the nearest rival to win the seat. Usually this has the effect of turning the largest single minority of votes cast in the nation into a clear majority of seats in the House of Commons for the largest single party, so in theory a candidate could be elected with only 2 votes if every other candidate only secured a single vote. In this way the system has benefited the two leading parties and discriminated against the political fortunes of all other parties, unless their votes are geographically concentrated in a particular part of the country. This pattern of discriminating has been discernable for years in the British electoral system. R. Rodgers and R. Walters refer to FPTP method as: "In this system there are no prizes for coming second; and it also means that the proportions of MPs of each party are not the same as the parties' shares of the votes cast across the nation as a whole."(How Parliament Works, 2004 p.24) ...read more.


With less public confusion the result will reflect the public opinion, making it fair. With this simplicity in the system there is also a drawback which is that there is a lack of choice given to the voters. The candidates are selected by a small number of party members, and voters can also choose between parties. If the candidate selected for your party has views which you disagree with, you are left no alternative choice within that party. Simple plurality voting is usually linked with single-member constituencies, although Japan is an important exception. Ian Budge, Ivor Crewe, David Mckay and Ken Newton state that: "The simple plurality system unfairly penalises minority parties, including large minority parties such as the liberal democrats, which have widespread rather than concentrated support."(The New British Politics, 2001 p.331) It allows voters to choose between people, rather than just between parties. At the same time, voters can assess the performance of individual candidates, rather than just having to accept a list of candidates presented by a party, as can happen under some List PR electoral systems. Finally, FPTP systems are particularly praised for being simple to use and understand. A valid vote requires only one mark beside the name or symbol of one candidate and the number of candidates on the ballot paper is usually small, making the count easy to administer for electoral officials. ...read more.


Another disadvantage of FPTP can occur in marginal constituencies, where voters tend to change their party loyalty from election to election, and among 'floating' or 'swing' voters, who have no firm party loyalty. The outcome of an election can be decided on the voting patterns in these situations, even although the constituents may number only a tiny proportion of the electorate. In my opinion FPTP system works well, pointing out that it has led to a stable governments based on parliamentary majorities of one party rather than coalition, which can be powerless and ineffective. Single party government is said to mean strong, accountable, and responsive government. However by a 'strong' government it can mean government can force through unpopular legislation such as the poll tax, and then perhaps a 'powerless' government would have to listen to the views and opinions of others, which would be no bad thing. FPTP is capable of creating governments which behave like elective dictatorships, but which do soon a minority of the popular vote. I would argue that there are more disadvantages to this system rather than advantages but FPTP system can be acceptable in many ways, for example making it simple and the results are produced more quickly without confusing the voter with a long list of parties and candidates. Take the UK's democracy; it is one of the strongest in the world and since no system is perfect, it shouldn't have to go through the massive revamp of changing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Response to the question

Response to Question
The candidate gives an extensive, well developed response to the question. They concisely explain first-past-the-post, and then go on to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of FPTP in an admirable level of detail. This structure enables the ...

Read full review

Response to the question

Response to Question
The candidate gives an extensive, well developed response to the question. They concisely explain first-past-the-post, and then go on to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of FPTP in an admirable level of detail. This structure enables the candidate to show the examiner that they understand FPTP, and allows them to introduce the debate before examining it in more detail. The essay has a somewhat pro-FPTP slant, but this enables the candidate to come down on one side of the debate, and the candidate clearly sets out many of the disadvantages of FPTP, so it isn't really a problem.

Level of analysis

Level of Analysis
The candidate's level of analysis is excellent. The essay goes into a lot of detail and examines the arguments for and against the use of FPTP to an appropriate level. The use of lots of examples from British politics is impressive. It shows that the candidate has a very good knowledge of the subject, and that they have done research/further reading on the topic, and the references to global politics demonstrate a wide range of research and knowledge.

Quality of writing

Quality of Writing
The candidate's quality of written communication is very good; they are able to clearly communicate their ideas and explain their points well. There are a few minor errors, such as failing to capitalise "liberal democrats" in one instance (although this appears to be a typo), but none of them are grave enough to warrant a serious loss of marks. The candidate also writes that "there is very little chance of drastic parties being elected" and while it is obvious what the candidate means from the context, I would use "extreme" or "extremist" instead, as it is a more accepted term. There is also a reference to the Conservatives as "Tories" and personally I would stick to referring to them as "the Conservative Party" or "Conservatives". It may be tiresome having to repeat yourself so much, but I believe it is better to stick to correct political terms, even though Tory is a very well known label for the Conservatives.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by ecaudate 28/02/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Pluralism in domestic politics

    the development of a properly functioning democracy, which would work for the benefit of all. In his Democracy in the United States, Dahl has a whole chapter devoted to analyzing the possible ways of influencing the government. It reads like a handbook for people hungry for influencing the government and

  2. What Are The Key Elements Of Thatcherism? To What Extent Was It A Reaction ...

    stake at elections, as there were many instances of bitter conflict between parties and party identification remained high - but the consensus was a set of parameters in which policies could change, almost agreed goals but disagreement on how they should be achieved.

  1. Decolonisation in India.

    At this level the thrust for taking the fight to the British and returning nationalism to the realm of anti-colonial struggle was provided not so much by 'elites' as by 'subalterns'-peasants, tribals, workers and lower classes. The traditional 'history from above' was not replaced but it was significantly refined.

  2. What impact did Mao have on the lives of the Chinese people from 1949 ...

    From 1962 to 1966, the Communist Party argued as to which road to take. The moderates wanted peasants working harder, to have bigger plots of land and to get paid according to how much work they did. Mao Zedong was opposed to these policies.

  1. how can the judiciary protect human rights?

    For example in July 2005, the power of the police to order youths back home was restricted by a decision that is made in the courts. The legal principle of stare decisis states that judges are obligated to follow the precedents established in prior decisions.

  2. Select And Explain The Most Important Turning Points In Nelson Mandela's Life

    As a pr�cis, it was the combination of Mandela's imprisonment in addition to many of the other stated turning events of Mandela's life. Which led to the overall, final most significant turning point in Mandela's life when on the 27th April 1994, he was appointed president of South Africa as

  1. The advantages of the Uk having a constitutional monarchy are greater than the disadvantages. ...

    Just like what the queen said 'lessons would be learned'iv. I am glad to aware that the royal family has recognized these problem and they 'set up a discussion procedure known as the Way Ahead Group. Senior members of the family, with the Queen herself in the chair, got together twice a year, during the holidays at Balmorals and Sandringham.'v.

  2. Should the voting age be lowered to 16 years?

    In addition to this he feels young people are at are disadvantage in society and are constantly being linked to crime which is not true and only makes young more frustrated.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work