• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

From reading source A, I can learn a lot about National Party's policy of Apartheid. They could integrate or separate the races. The National Party believed that integration "would in the long run amount to suicide".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Apartheid Coursework From reading source A, I can learn a lot about National Party's policy of Apartheid. They could integrate or separate the races. The National Party believed that integration "would in the long run amount to suicide". They saw Apartheid as an opportunity to "safeguard" the future of whites, by segregating the different racial communities. This soon became the National Party's principle. Anyone, for example churches, which may oppose this, were not to be tolerated. Blacks were thought of as not superior and were to stay in their reserves. They figure that if they make the Indian's go back to India (this is called repatriation), and put the blacks in suburbs, segregation would stop non-whites trying to clear out whites. The blacks were even robbed of basic civil rights, such as social and voting rights From reading sources A and B, I can say their views of Apartheid differ tremendously. The National Party issued source A. They believe that the system of Apartheid would benefit South Africa. Keeping black separate from white would lead to social, and economical increase for the country. Source C opposes this. The writer believes that Apartheid will cause economic difficulties, for example, the National Party believes that an absolute necessity to employ native and coloured labour in the factories. ...read more.

Middle

This view challenges the view in source E. it contradicts all that was written. Source F is from a speech made by Verwoerd, speaking about the Bantu Education Act. He clearly implies that Bantus are second-class citizens and that their education should be restricted. "What is the use of teaching a Bantu child, mathematics, when it cannot use it practise? That is absurd" Verwoerd is referring to the Bantus as 'it'. This proves that Verwoerd does not see the Bantu, as individuals, but more like slaves to the country. They have no prospect of joining the affluent society, so education needn't be proper. This source supports source E, Bantustans are not beneficial for the people who live in them. Source H is from a government circular. It shows that the Bantu who live in Bantustans are those who are incapable of basic labour - the rejects. This can't be used in factories, so are dumped in Bantustans. This source supports source E. it proves that Bantustans are "The white man's garbage can" Source D is a praise of Verwoerd and Bantustans. It says that Verwoerd gave the Bantu's, "good laws" and "proper education". "Verwoerd knew that we (Bantus) ...read more.

Conclusion

For instance, in 1960, Robert Sobukwe (leader of the PAC - a new black group formed to gain equal rights for Pan-Africans) began a campaign. Sobukwe and his supporters marched to the police station of Orlando Township. They were immediately arrested, but this just caused a larger disturbance. A large, noisy crowd surrounded the police station. One young policeman lost hi nerve, and fired into the crowd, as did his colleagues. Sixty-nine people were murdered that day, and a further one hundred and eighty were injured. This incident is known as the 'Sharpeville Massacre. This became known, worldwide, and demands were made for Apartheid to end. During 1960's, there were various worldwide anti-Apartheid movements. For instance, sporting boycotts and also trade boycotts - which I've already mentioned. Although I have so far proved that Apartheid was unworkable, and harmful, this is not necessarily true. Although trade did decrease during 1980's, it rose from 1960, onwards. With South Africa being rich in minerals, Apartheid was the perfect time to take advantage of these resources. Using blacks for cheap labour, the government soon gained. This proves the statement wrong. It decreased when the world discovered working conditions, and refused to trade. South Africa soon became a pariah state. "Apartheid could never work and was harmful to South Africa." - This is true, to a certain degree. History Coursework 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. South Africa 1945-1994 The end of Apartheid.

    population of the whites in South Africa and the country as a whole which is something they did not want. Even though it hit the blacks hard to start with it helped them in the long run, with giving them their rights and freedom.

  2. Green is the Colour: "how people of different races, the heirs of colonial and ...

    oneself, thus hampering the nation's efforts to unite the people through a common national identity. Besides that, Malaysia's current Prime Minister, Dato' Seri Abdullah bin Haji Ahmad Badawi had also reminded us of the nation's vulnerability to such issues in his speech titled "The Challenges of Multi-Religious, Multi-Ethnic and Multi-Cultural

  1. How important was the opposition of other countries in bringing apartheid in South Africa ...

    The ANC were a major part of the black resistance and were a long term cause for the disintegration of Apartheid. Internal resistance and black opposition were the main causes for the collapse of Apartheid. Throughout the Nationalists reign there had always been the threat of resistance thus making them long term causes.

  2. Why did the National party in South Africa put forward the policy of apartheid ...

    Because they believed in white supremacy there was many laws passed. The "Colour Bar Act, which stopped blacks from doing skilled and semi-skilled jobs. The "Native Land Act" which gave the whites 92.7 percent of land. The "Immorality Act" banned any sexual intercourse between whites and blacks.

  1. Sharpeville Massacre Sources Question

    Source C does not provide an accurate description of what happened at Sharpeville. This can be ascertained by comparing it with sources A, B, D and E. Firstly, Source C does not make any reference to the people present being 'protestors', although it does refer to them as a 'mob'.

  2. Apartheid in South Africa.

    This could be seen as unreliable though, in the sense that the Anglican Church was very against apartheid so the Bishop could be saying this in favour of all those against apartheid or suspicious of the happenings at Sharpeville. However, in the concluding paragraph of his statement, Reeves states that

  1. With reference to material you have studied discuss the major policy differences between the ...

    decommissioning of IRA weaponry and IRA disbandment before he will agree to go back into government with Sinn Fein. As stated previously, this transforming attitude to Sinn Fein resembles actions more common to the DUP and supports the claim that the UUP is slowly striving to be more hard-line and

  2. South Africa - Apartheid Sources Questions

    The National Party managed to get 79 seats and The United Party 71, resulting in the National Party winning the election and the United Party supporters feeling disappointed. Question D In Source E the view of Bantustans are shown as being a bad thing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work