• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Have modern Liberals abandoned individualism and embraced collectivism?

Free essay example:

Have modern Liberals abandoned individualism and embraced collectivism?

Modern liberalism is a development within liberal ideology that has revised some of the ideas of classical liberalism. Some classical liberals argue that modern liberalism has abandoned individualism and embraced collectivism to the extent that it has abandoned a belief in the free market and the minimal state and endorsed economic and social intervention.

An alternative view is that modern liberalism has built on and revised core liberal ideas rather than abandoned them, much like the relationship between traditional conservatism and the New Right. The two schools of thought in this case agree on the same core values and goals, but the way in which they go about attempting to achieve them is different. Thus the modern liberal case for government is based on a belief in developmental individualism (linked to human flourishing), and positive freedom (viewed as personal fulfilment). The modern liberal case for state intervention is an equivocal one: they only support intervention when individuals can’t help themselves, usually because of social disadvantage.

A further view could be that modern liberalism is characterised by an attempt to reconcile individualism with collectivism.

Collectivism is the belief that collective social action is morally and practically superior to individual self-striving. It highlights the social aspect of human nature and portrays collective bodies or social groups as meaningful entities.

Individualism is often associated with attempts to contract or minimising the state with a view to widening individual freedom and strengthening individual responsibility .This is reflected in the classical liberal preference for a minimal state and, in its most extreme form, in anarcho-individualism.

However, developmental individualism has been used by modem liberals to support qualified interventionism, linked to the expansion of positive freedom.

Collectivism is commonly associated with pushing the state forward, the state being a mechanism through which collective energies are harnessed and collective ends achieved. This is evident in socialist support for social and economic intervention and, ultimately, state collectivisation.

However, collectivism can have anti-statist implications in that it highlights the capacity for social harmony, most clearly reflected in ideas of anarcho- collectivism.

The Classic Liberal view is that society exists for the sake of the individual. The highest purpose of the state, if there is to be a state, consists in aiding individuals to achieve their own happiness. The result of this understanding of moral philosophy is that each individual, each human being, is supremely important. Each individual should regard his or her own success in life as of supreme importance.

The above concept of Individualism fits in perfectly with Classical Liberalism. Every person is sovereign in a social and political context. The citizen in a Classical Liberal society is recognised as having a moral nature with personal authority over his or her own life. No state or government may deny individuals their natural rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of their own happiness. The state exists for the sake of the individual and not the individual for the sake of the state.

In a way, modern liberalism can be seen as a bridge between liberalism and socialism. John Rawls developed an argument in favour of redistribution of wealth, arguing that if people were unaware of their social position, they would view an egalitarian society as “fairer” than an inegalitarian one, because the desire to avoid poverty is greater than that of attaining great riches.

Individualism does not mean that one isolates oneself from society, communities, associations, organisations, and so forth. In fact, Individualists need to join together and work together if the political philosophies of Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism are to be promoted, however Modern Liberals take this a step further in arguing that we ourselves should compensate for others misfortune.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE Politics Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Prospects for India's development

    By trying to impose the hiring of apprentices through more regulation, the government solely creates additional costs for firms to do business in India. On the other hand the emphasis on funding institutions with alternative curricula such as professional degrees would be a reasonable action to be taken.

  2. A Modern World Study - Modern China.

    In the 19th century Britain opened up ports to Chinese traders in Hong Kong and China was feeling threatened by Western forces. In 1894 the Japanese defeated the Chinese fleet even though the Japanese were considered as the inferior nation.

  1. Why did the Liberals concentrate on poverty? 1906-11.

    Also the economic situation was less secure than it was in the mid-19th Century. This highlighted the problems with Laissez-Faire and asked the question: "How would a government that followed a policy of state intervention fair in Britain?" With this new way of governing Britain, the working class would benefit.

  2. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    The concept of individual rights has solely developed in the West and in China social relations were derived from family relations. Most researchers of Late Imperial China have noted this clear distinction between the interpretation of laws in the society in Anglo-Saxon societies and Chinese societies.

  1. To what extent are the experiences of Yang Digong and Li Zucui typical of ...

    We're really not interested in politics. We are interested in getting a good job." This proved that students just wanted money to get on with their own lives. Like most people, like Yang did. Yang was a role model of Red Capitalism.

  2. To what extent are the experiences and attitudes of Yang Digong and Li Zucui ...

    an arranged marriage whereby she was sold to a man she didn't even know for a mere 2.300 Yuan (177 pounds.) This proves what little importance Li was to the family. Life in modern China was hard enough for women as they were treated as second-class citizens and faced discrimination

  1. Hobbes and Locke both abandoned the thought of the divine right of monarchy.

    Locke's modern day liberalist ideas about the people's sovereignty was that the power should rest with the people. He expressed that the government should be there to preserve our natural rights. He also explains that if a ruler or the assembly governing came to unfair ruling then the citizens had the right to rebel.

  2. Decentralization and development of modern local government systems in Eastern Europe

    In countries involved in the European Union preaccession process the role of the intermediary level of government-regionalization-is a crucial issue (as in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland). The legal and administrative structure of large capital cities is also an important component of the planned reforms, as in these relatively

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work