• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Have modern Liberals abandoned individualism and embraced collectivism?

Free essay example:

Have modern Liberals abandoned individualism and embraced collectivism?

Modern liberalism is a development within liberal ideology that has revised some of the ideas of classical liberalism. Some classical liberals argue that modern liberalism has abandoned individualism and embraced collectivism to the extent that it has abandoned a belief in the free market and the minimal state and endorsed economic and social intervention.

An alternative view is that modern liberalism has built on and revised core liberal ideas rather than abandoned them, much like the relationship between traditional conservatism and the New Right. The two schools of thought in this case agree on the same core values and goals, but the way in which they go about attempting to achieve them is different. Thus the modern liberal case for government is based on a belief in developmental individualism (linked to human flourishing), and positive freedom (viewed as personal fulfilment). The modern liberal case for state intervention is an equivocal one: they only support intervention when individuals can’t help themselves, usually because of social disadvantage.

A further view could be that modern liberalism is characterised by an attempt to reconcile individualism with collectivism.

Collectivism is the belief that collective social action is morally and practically superior to individual self-striving. It highlights the social aspect of human nature and portrays collective bodies or social groups as meaningful entities.

Individualism is often associated with attempts to contract or minimising the state with a view to widening individual freedom and strengthening individual responsibility .This is reflected in the classical liberal preference for a minimal state and, in its most extreme form, in anarcho-individualism.

However, developmental individualism has been used by modem liberals to support qualified interventionism, linked to the expansion of positive freedom.

Collectivism is commonly associated with pushing the state forward, the state being a mechanism through which collective energies are harnessed and collective ends achieved. This is evident in socialist support for social and economic intervention and, ultimately, state collectivisation.

However, collectivism can have anti-statist implications in that it highlights the capacity for social harmony, most clearly reflected in ideas of anarcho- collectivism.

The Classic Liberal view is that society exists for the sake of the individual. The highest purpose of the state, if there is to be a state, consists in aiding individuals to achieve their own happiness. The result of this understanding of moral philosophy is that each individual, each human being, is supremely important. Each individual should regard his or her own success in life as of supreme importance.

The above concept of Individualism fits in perfectly with Classical Liberalism. Every person is sovereign in a social and political context. The citizen in a Classical Liberal society is recognised as having a moral nature with personal authority over his or her own life. No state or government may deny individuals their natural rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of their own happiness. The state exists for the sake of the individual and not the individual for the sake of the state.

In a way, modern liberalism can be seen as a bridge between liberalism and socialism. John Rawls developed an argument in favour of redistribution of wealth, arguing that if people were unaware of their social position, they would view an egalitarian society as “fairer” than an inegalitarian one, because the desire to avoid poverty is greater than that of attaining great riches.

Individualism does not mean that one isolates oneself from society, communities, associations, organisations, and so forth. In fact, Individualists need to join together and work together if the political philosophies of Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism are to be promoted, however Modern Liberals take this a step further in arguing that we ourselves should compensate for others misfortune.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE Politics Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent are the experiences and attitudes of Yang Digong and Li Zucui ...

    The reason I say this is because I think that the government were in fact treating the Tibetans in an un-orderly manor and they did not allow religious freedoms at all. This is not right and I think that the protest was fully justified in that sense.

  2. Prospects for India's development

    Furthermore, the country lacked political leadership in 1999. The stronger political foundation of the current coalition government, combined with a series of recent fruits of diplomatic achievement (Clinton's trip to India and Vajpayee's trip to Germany etc), will probably increase future FDI in India to some extent but will be limited to certain industries.

  1. A Modern World Study - Modern China.

    Confucius, a mid-ranking official born around 551BC was very influential until 1949, when the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) were elected. Under Mao, the leader of the CCP, Confucius was denounced as a backward looking influence on China and during the cultural revolution of 1966-76 every trace of Confucius' writing, and

  2. Why did the Liberals concentrate on poverty? 1906-11.

    The success of the schemes that were set up raised the possibilities of similar ideas being practiced on a national scale. There are four other main factors that attributed to the development of New Liberalism. Firstly, the report by Rowntree and Booth made many Liberals question their traditional values (believing in a policy of Laissez-Faire and 'Classical Liberalism')

  1. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    As Mencius said to King Xuan of Qi's question about the royal line: "If the ruler has great faults, they should remonstrate with him. If, after they have done so repeatedly, he does not listen, they should depose him" (Mencius 5B:9).

  2. To what extent are the experiences of Yang Digong and Li Zucui typical of ...

    This wasn't very typical, as most people focused on money, but had to exchange family care for this. Most people, especially students, believed that politics were not important; money is the key to a good life: " We students don't talk about politics in our dormitory.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work