• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How and why does the extent of presidential power vary in the fifth French Republic?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How and why does the extent of presidential power vary in the fifth French Republic? Before examining the varying levels of presidential power in the Fifth Republic of France, it is first necessary to explain the downfall of the Fourth Republic and the rise of the Fifth with reference given to the President. The previous republics were parliamentary republics where the balance of power rested with parliament. The Fourth Republic especially and those before it failed due to the overwhelming power of parliament and the fractioness of the system. However well the Fourth Republic performed it seemed that it was destined to be for the duration of its existence - la mal aim´┐Że - unloved. Through the office of President, the Fifth Republic allowed for strong leadership at national and international level. The Fifth Republic was born of its predecessor's inability to provide France with stable government, to implement any consistent policy towards Algeria, and to command either the support of its people or the obedience of its own servants.1 That is to say it lacked the legitimacy, authority and capacity to govern which as shall be shown later are the cornerstones of successful governance. This essay will show how the President's power varies through a variety of criteria, both internal and external, ranging from economic reasons, to the nature and status of his adversaries. Before exploring in depth the varying powers of the President it is vital to note the actions of a person who is almost universally credited with the birth of the Fifth French Republic, General Charles de Gaulle. ...read more.

Middle

In the following legislative elections of March 1986, the PS, the presidential party, was defeated at the hands of the right - wing RPR-UDF coalition. This inaugurated a constitutionally unprecedented period of cohabitation between a Socialist President and a right wing parliamentary majority in the National Assembly.5 It was at this time that Jacques Chirac, the leader of the largest party in the Assembly was appointed Prime Minister, a period of cohabitation had begun. Chirac made it clear he had a democratic mandate to govern. Would Presidential power, for so long the dominant characteristic in French politics, be severely undermined? It seems that although French politicians dislike cohabitation, the French themselves clearly endorse it. They voted for it in three of the last five national elections as a means to counterbalance the president's extensive powers.6 Although it can be viewed as a healthy form of checks and balances, measures have been introduced to try and reduce the chances of further cohabitation. This has been done through a bipartisan reform in 2000 which reduced the presidential term from seven to five years, the same as the National Assembly, and synchronised the voting dates. The theory was that voters would not be so perverse as to elect a new President and one month later, hand a parliamentary majority to his opponents.7. Therefore it can be shown that a President's power varies according to the composition of the Parliament. ...read more.

Conclusion

Giscard was not always so fortunate, he faced a far less favourable economic situation than his predecessors: the first oil shock ended the West's long post-war boom right at the end of the Pompidou presidency. Like other Western leaders, Giscard first failed to get the measure of the crisis and then paid a heavy price for the unpopular economic measures he finally took. His defeat was paralleled by Callaghan's in Britain in 1979; Jimmy Carter's in the United States in 1980; and Helmut Schmidt's in Germany in 1982. 11 Most Western leaders derive their power from the constitution of the respective state. The case of France is somewhat different due to a rather unique type of dual executive. This essay has shown how there are a variety of factors, which determine the extent of the power of the President in the Fifth Republic of France varying from internal to external influences on power, from the constitution and cohabitation, to the nature and status of his adversaries to the economy. These can all be effectively grouped together under the headings of legitimacy, authority and capacity which are the three components that can either give the President power, or remove their power if they are not existent, and therefore explain the reasoning behind how and why the extent of presidential power in Fifth French Republic varies. (Word count: 1,965 words) 10 A. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Analyze the weakness of the Third Republic of France in the period, 1875-1914.

    The republican regime later even allied with the socialists. 3. Economic distress formed yet another source of weakness of the Republic. In the period,1875-1914, France's economic strength had been growing slowly. In terms of industrial production, France was in the second position in 1871.

  2. To what extent was there a 'post war consensus' between 1945-1970.

    The Conservative Party had been forced to reassess their thinking and had incorporated some of Labour's ideas and policies into their programme, including accepting the Welfare State and a mixed economy, in order to appeal to the electorate. The Conservatives were elected to government and remained there for thirteen years.

  1. To What Extent did the reforms of the Constituent Assembly reshape France?

    In towns the councils were very effective; there were a good supply of literate, talented men. But in villages there very few literate and talented men so there were poor deputies. Also in Catholic areas, officials disliked persecuting priests who had refused to take the oath of loyalty, and consequently resigned and areas were left without any effective local government.

  2. Free essay

    Outline the principal sources of authority available to US presidents. How similar is executive ...

    He can maintain high standing with the public if his cabinet is appointed sensibly and he has a healthy working relationship with congress. Therefore, other political actors are an important resource of the president's authority. By making clever decisions about who to be in his cabinet, a president can accomplish a number of goals.

  1. Describe the Stages in Which Germany Changed From an Authoritarian to a Democratic Republic ...

    The choices Ebert made meant that the Government travelled in a certain direction and missed the chance to take views from a cross section of society. The most important stage of the change was the formal establishment of the new regime.

  2. Parliamentary government and Presidential government

    The executive is the branch of a government charged with implementing, or executing, the law and running the day-to-day affairs of the government or state. The most senior figure in an executive is referred to as the head of government.

  1. What advice would you give to Labor Leadership in light of the recent research ...

    Furthermore, Labor can continue to foster division within the Conservatives by offering deals to certain wings of the party in order to cause splits. The resent Blair-Cranborne deal over reform of the House of Lords is an excellent example. The news media jumped on the division in the opposition party

  2. The United States uses a presidential system of government and is a stable democracy; ...

    The presidential system offers a strong case for new democracies to adopt it. New democratic regimes need stability and the fixed term in office for the president offers that providing continuity in the executive, and so avoiding collapse of governing coalitions experienced by parliamentary governments.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work