• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

how can the judiciary protect human rights?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How is the judiciary able to protect civil liberties in the UK? Civil liberties are the freedoms and rights which the citizen of a state may enjoy, that are guaranteed by the state. Until 1998, with the passage of the Human Rights Act, the UK had no codified set of civil liberties. This meant that citizens' rights were negative. A citizen could do anything up to the point where it becomes restricted by law. It is crucial that the judiciary is able to protect civil liberties and it has several methods with which to do this with, such as judicial review, the European Court of Human Rights and appealing to common law in the high court. The Human Rights Act has provided the judiciary with a codified set of rules that they can use to protect civil liberties. However the government were unwilling to set aside the principle of parliamentary sovereignty which means that Westminster is not subject to the HRA. However the judiciary can make a 'declaration of incompatibility' which allows them to hold the government to account and protect the civil liberties of citizens in the UK. For example, with the Belmarsh detainees case in December 2004. ...read more.

Middle

Judges may also question any government acts which are "irrational" or highly unreasonable, or acts which show procedural impropriety. The use of judicial review as a means of questioning government's actions has increased from 87 cases in 1968 to 3848 in 1997. Some argue that this growing number of cases means there is an increasing willingness on the part of the judiciary to intervene in the day-to-day business of government. Also the effectiveness of judicial review is limited by the reluctance of some judges to allow cases to go ahead and access to the system is limited as the right to a judicial review is not automatic. However the judiciary does have a number of remedies to protect civil liberties. The court can quash decisions made by public agents if they feel that they have been acting 'ultra vires.' A public body can be compelled to perform a specified function by law and any public body can be ordered not to carry out or to stop carrying out an action that the court decides is unlawful. A claimant for judicial review may also seek an injunction, a declaration or damages. In this way the judiciary has a number of methods to protect civil liberties that are disputed by judicial reviews. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example Lord Woolf has openly criticised the erosion of civil liberties. In criticising the government the judiciary can put pressure on them to ensure civil liberties are protected. Although elected representatives, the media, tribunals and pressure groups have played an increasingly important role in the protection of civil liberties in the UK, the judiciary remains the primary defence against the erosion of civil liberties. Judges have a lot of methods to enhance and protect civil liberties. Judicial review is an important example of these powers and can have a great impact on the organs of government and public bodies. Although the Human Rights act is not binding on Westminster it remains an important tool in tackling the erosion of civil liberties and provides judges with a codified set of rules to back up rulings. In recent decades I think more power has been given to the judiciary in being able to protect the civil liberties of citizens in the UK. Citizens have a clearer sense of their rights and freedoms than ever before and are able to take the necessary routes in ensuring that they receive these rights. Although parliamentary sovereignty remains an important part of the constitution the judiciary is able to hold government to account and pressurise them to protect civil liberties in the UK. Kate Manson Page 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. PUBLIC LAW

    The House of Lords are, in most cases, subordinate to the House of Commons. Moreover, the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 states that the Lords cannot veto legislation introduced in the Commons, but it does have the right to delay.

  2. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    Hence much of their political control over their constituencies is handed over to their local henchmen, who in turn exercise control over local administration as well (not unlike absentee landlordism of past eras). When the time comes to distribute the booties of an electoral victory, there are obviously more candidates

  1. Public Law

    However, it can be argued that judicial review itself is unconstitutional. In a democratic majoritarian government, as in Britain, the governing party is elected by the public to represent them, for their policies meet the majority of the public's demands.

  2. Public Law

    If this is not possible, then the judge is to make a declaration of incompatibility, but this is purely a last resort. If this occurs then it is up to the Government to either alter the 'bad' legislation or to overrule the convention.

  1. Does Hobbes's Sovereign or Locke's Civil Government provide better protection for the citizen?

    This can be seen for one of his reasons for why Hobbes came to his concluding theory that the sovereign is the way in which everyone has to be led "When sovereign is issued, that's the law, anyone who disagrees with it is seen as illegitimate".

  2. Asylum seekers

    * All claimants have a responsibility to co-operate with the authorities considering their claim. They must: o Tell the truth about their circumstances; o Obey the law. It is a criminal offence to submit a claim involving deception, the maximum penalty for which is two years imprisonment; o Keep in regular contact with the authorities considering their claim.

  1. Shifting blame for Home Office mistakes in dealing with asylum seekers

    Their role is to give presentational and policy advice to Ministers, to help them write political speeches and articles, and if necessary add a political dimension to speeches drafted by officials. They work closely with Private Offices and Press Offices and give advice in parallel with line divisions.

  2. Have Prior Reforms Of The Lords Been Effective And Can Anything Further Be Done ...

    Blair assured that a Labour government would abolish the system of attaining vast degrees of power purely through birth. He has openly said that he wishes to reform the lords, and the 1999 act to abolish hereditary peers is seen as his first step.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work