• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How close was Britain to revolution by 1914?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How close was Britain to revolution by 1914? It was suggested that Britain was close to a revolution by George Dangerfield, the reason given was that the Liberal Government had been unable to face problems posed by, the growth of militancy, Home Rule for Ireland, Trade Union unrest and House of Lords. Added to this, the growing international situations and the threat of war and it could be true to say that, through the Liberal Governments inability to solve these problems, Britain may have been close to revolution. The growth of militancy and votes for women had developed through 1900, and the Liberal government had been placed under considerable pressure, to pass a franchise Bill. When the suffragettes turned to violent militant tactics, yet more pressure was put on the government to take action. ...read more.

Middle

Ireland was the largest worry for the government and the largest threat for a revolution, taking into account the Easter Rising, and if the Liberal Government had passed Home Rule there would have been a revolution against it by the UUF. So the Liberal Government reasonable compromise was met. Between 1912 and 1913 was the peak of Trade Union envoked strikes, workers from all around Britain striked for better working conditions and pay. However even though the strikes were nationwide with millions involved were localised and posed no real threat to the Liberal Government, most strikes were for better wage from employees. With this in mind, it can be said that the government felt threatened by the Trade Unions, and as a consequence took harsh action against some strikes for example in Tonypendy, Wales, troops were used to forcefully disperse the crowds of strikers, Historians agree that the use of unnecessary force on ...read more.

Conclusion

The action taken by the liberal government to end this crisis was to threaten the lords with 500 new Liberal peers or impose a Bill to take their power of veto. This action was taken swiftly by the Liberal government, and then had managed to keep a lid on the situation. In conclusion, Britain was quite close to a revolution, when all the problems faced by the Liberals were brought together, it is easy to see why this can be said, however, the threat from the Trade Unions, suffragettes and House of Lords was very minimal. The decline of the Liberal government was caused by the inability to solve these serious problems and the approach of war. The war swept all other problems aside and bought in new problems such as the growth of the conservation MP'S within the coalition government, throughout the war. 08/05/07 Helen Ward - 1 - C:\TEMP\How close was Britain to revolution.doc ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How close did Britain come to revolution between 1815 and 1821?

    In 1817 600 unemployed weavers marched from Manchester to London in groups of 10. Each man carried a blanket as a sign of peaceful petition. This group of men known as the Blanketeers, were anti violence and definitely not revolutionary, they presented no evidence of being politically motivated, but simply wanted jobs to buy food for themselves and their families.

  2. To what extents can the events of 1905 in Russia be considered a revolution.

    first Marxist group was formed by Plekhanov, the Father of Russian Marxism, as late as 1883. In 1898, Lenin formed another Marxist party, known as the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party. In August 1903, the Social Democratic Party held a party congress in London.

  1. France and Britain: The Difference Within.

    The recruiting base is from the Ox-bridge connection, which is Oxford and Cambridge, which is very narrow, only the elite go to these schools. The political culture of Britain is a direct correlation here, because the British have very

  2. Show by Close Reference to the Text How the Writer Creates and Maintains Tension ...

    They do not need to explain what the topic of conversation is, they can just made a comment that concerns the party, and the other knows what the first is making reference to. This makes it seem as though they were meant to be one person and should not have been split into two people.

  1. Why did Britain have no '1848 revolution'?

    Second, the working class was split. Living standards in the first half of the nineteenth century improved for the more skilled working class. This caused divisions between skilled workers and those who (as their counterparts on the continent) wanted to overthrow the existing system from which they were presently excluded.

  2. Summary of the Causes of the 1905 Revolution.

    to be incompetent ------------------------------------------------------------------- Explanatory Notes Social discontentment For most of 1905, the Tsar was 'at war with his own people' - an endless series of strikes, demonstrations, barricades, petitions and political meetings. All groups joined in the protests: workers, students, civil servants, teachers, doctors and even imperial ballet dancers went on strike.

  1. Civil Service Reform.

    but also including the MoD's atomic weapons establishment, the Police National Computer and the National Lottery. In-house civil service teams won 68 per cent of the work they were permitted to bid for. But in 113 test exercises in-house bids had not been allowed and the work had been contracted-out

  2. A House Divided.

    Neither group of people were able to overrule the interests of the other class. Religious toleration was also granted to some Northern colonies. For example, in New York, the Duke's Laws guaranteed religious freedom and created local governments. The Northern colonies seemed to grant the settlers more freedom on important political issues than in the Southern colonies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work