• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the reforms of the constitutional assembly change France?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Jannine Layhe 'How did the reforms of the constitutional assembly change France?' By 1789, much work had been done toward the reforming of France, after the Ancien Regime was abolished. The constitutional assembly was set up, for the making of the constitution, their main aims were to make the citizens of France more equal, abolishing the estates, changing taxation laws, reducing the power of the church, reforming the economy and addressing the local governments. The assembly focused on making France a more humanitarian civilisation, with decentralisation of the government, introducing new d�partements and democracy. The assembly came about because of the need for change after the revolution, and so the more liberal of the nobles joined together and set about this mammoth task. Many of the things the assembly did did a lot for the country but as with everything there were drawbacks. One of the major areas the assembly reformed was the local government. Under the Ancien Regime the local government were quite frankly poorly organised with little power to make change amongst their area, mainly because of the absolute monarchy. Also, under the Ancien Regime, the country was split into g�n�raliti�s, of which there were no clear boundaries, and per each generality was just one intendent, who tended to be ...read more.

Middle

Also they decided that priests and bishops had to be elected by the local communities. Another issue they tried to combat was absenteeism, of which they declared that a man of the cloth could not have more than 15 days absent a year, because the government were paying them now to do a job. However the Assembly enforced a signing of an oath to the Church, which caused a huge split throughout the country. The oath basically meant the Church agreed to the changes France was making to the Church. However some priests signed the oath early and it took a while for the Pope to get back to whether he agreed to it or not, when he did get back to them he decided that he didn't and this caused the rift between those who had signed and those who hadn't. Those who did sign were seen to be going against the church, which is where it was felt their loyalty should be, and obviously the villagers of the parish priests who had signed agreed with their priest. This changed France because it meant it was much less religion focused and the Church's power was slipping, as well as the rift because of the oath that had been signed by some. ...read more.

Conclusion

They got rid of torture and as a means to make their society more humane, by introducing the guillotine, which was supposed to be the most humane form of capital punishment at that time. The new system proved itself by reducing the number of crimes dramatically which obviously changed France for the better making it a nicer place to live, especially Paris. The new judiciary made a huge impact in France and stuck for longest, it made France a fairer more equal place to live. Overall France had changed quite drastically, and it was better for some than others for example, the bourgeoisie benefited most because they had the money to buy church land and such, and they were the ones who benefited from the national banking system. They also didn't have the main burden of tax paying, as didn't the poorer people. The nobility and clergy who had benefited before didn't have the same privileges and rights, which made France a fairer place to live for the under classes, but this didn't mean the old upper estates were too pleased. The oath that was signed by half the clergy and the sacking of many of the admin in the church didn't please the French orthodox either, and especially not Rome, when the clergy were asked to remain a part of France and not Rome. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Britain has a constitutional monarchy. The 'constitutional monarchy' is in which the monarch acknowledges ...

    It functions through various activities: the regular visits to these countries, the presence of herself in the meeting of the Commonwealth Heads of Government (CHOGM), offering non-ministerial message during the Commonwealth day celebration and so on5. In someway, the pomp and pageantry of the monarchy is good for tourism.

  2. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    It would be able to remove Trident from the Clyde, demand Scotland's share of the oil revenues and speak up for Scotland in Europe."5 This speech highlighted some peoples' growing concerns that devolution was merely a stepping stone to the complete breakdown of the Union, the United Kingdom as it now stands.

  1. Public Law 1 Assessed Essay 1

    This contention is supported by reference to the case of Attorney General for New South Wales v Trethowan [1932] AC 526. The Australian Constitution Act of 1902 was enacted by the legislature of New South Wales and was amended in 1929 by adding section 7A.

  2. A Modernizing Monarch

    The government also put restrictions on universities in 1866, five years after they had gained autonomy. The central government attempted to act through the zemstva to establish uniform curricula for elementary schools and to impose conservative policies, but it lacked resources.

  1. Agenda for change

    While managers on the other hand, must balance the books and strive to achieve targets set by the governments. Because of this doctors feel as if they are having to work in ways that compromises their values. This causes deep distress, hence more and more doctors are joining private organisations

  2. The debate over immigration and French identity is one of the most controversial questions ...

    The new demand for immigration emerged from WWI and led to the massive immigration of the 1920s, bringing the total number of foreigners living in france to 1.600 000, this is 6.5% of french population. Differences with wartime immigration focus not only on the volume but also on the composition

  1. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    Seventy-five of these were to represent the political parties and Crossbenchers, fifteen peers were to remain as office holders and further two peers were to remain in a ceremonial capacity. Beside, ten hereditary peers were given life peerages in November 1999 and seven hereditary peers were given life peerages in March 2000.

  2. Have Prior Reforms Of The Lords Been Effective And Can Anything Further Be Done ...

    Members of the upper chamber, though, have the ability to show less fear and more resistance to party leaders and whips. This is due to them being unelected and therefore it was not possible to remove them from positions for going against the party line.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work