• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the reforms of the constitutional assembly change France?

Extracts from this document...


Jannine Layhe 'How did the reforms of the constitutional assembly change France?' By 1789, much work had been done toward the reforming of France, after the Ancien Regime was abolished. The constitutional assembly was set up, for the making of the constitution, their main aims were to make the citizens of France more equal, abolishing the estates, changing taxation laws, reducing the power of the church, reforming the economy and addressing the local governments. The assembly focused on making France a more humanitarian civilisation, with decentralisation of the government, introducing new d�partements and democracy. The assembly came about because of the need for change after the revolution, and so the more liberal of the nobles joined together and set about this mammoth task. Many of the things the assembly did did a lot for the country but as with everything there were drawbacks. One of the major areas the assembly reformed was the local government. Under the Ancien Regime the local government were quite frankly poorly organised with little power to make change amongst their area, mainly because of the absolute monarchy. Also, under the Ancien Regime, the country was split into g�n�raliti�s, of which there were no clear boundaries, and per each generality was just one intendent, who tended to be ...read more.


Also they decided that priests and bishops had to be elected by the local communities. Another issue they tried to combat was absenteeism, of which they declared that a man of the cloth could not have more than 15 days absent a year, because the government were paying them now to do a job. However the Assembly enforced a signing of an oath to the Church, which caused a huge split throughout the country. The oath basically meant the Church agreed to the changes France was making to the Church. However some priests signed the oath early and it took a while for the Pope to get back to whether he agreed to it or not, when he did get back to them he decided that he didn't and this caused the rift between those who had signed and those who hadn't. Those who did sign were seen to be going against the church, which is where it was felt their loyalty should be, and obviously the villagers of the parish priests who had signed agreed with their priest. This changed France because it meant it was much less religion focused and the Church's power was slipping, as well as the rift because of the oath that had been signed by some. ...read more.


They got rid of torture and as a means to make their society more humane, by introducing the guillotine, which was supposed to be the most humane form of capital punishment at that time. The new system proved itself by reducing the number of crimes dramatically which obviously changed France for the better making it a nicer place to live, especially Paris. The new judiciary made a huge impact in France and stuck for longest, it made France a fairer more equal place to live. Overall France had changed quite drastically, and it was better for some than others for example, the bourgeoisie benefited most because they had the money to buy church land and such, and they were the ones who benefited from the national banking system. They also didn't have the main burden of tax paying, as didn't the poorer people. The nobility and clergy who had benefited before didn't have the same privileges and rights, which made France a fairer place to live for the under classes, but this didn't mean the old upper estates were too pleased. The oath that was signed by half the clergy and the sacking of many of the admin in the church didn't please the French orthodox either, and especially not Rome, when the clergy were asked to remain a part of France and not Rome. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    One third of the regions would select regional members at each general election. Model B provides that eighty-seven regional members directly elected at the same time as the European Parliament elections under a system of proportional representation. This model is welcomed by a majority of Commission.

  2. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    Negatively and conversely, the press also often inverts and becomes the mouthpiece of governing political parties and of large corporations in order to receive social, political, and monetary benefits. The use of the press and broadcasting stations as the organ of large corporations is currently a major concern in Turkey.

  1. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    It would be able to remove Trident from the Clyde, demand Scotland's share of the oil revenues and speak up for Scotland in Europe."5 This speech highlighted some peoples' growing concerns that devolution was merely a stepping stone to the complete breakdown of the Union, the United Kingdom as it now stands.

  2. Public Law 1 Assessed Essay 1

    This is similar to the earlier mentioned case of the repeal of the Northen Ireland Act, which requires a refendum if it is to be changed. In such a case the courts will enforce the rule that all the steps mentioned within the statute will have to be taken before the repealing of the Act can take place.

  1. A Modernizing Monarch

    The accession of Alexander II brought a social restructuring that required a public discussion of issues and the lifting of some types of censorship. When an attempt was made to assassinate the tsar in 1866, the government reinstated censorship, but not with the severity of pre-1855 control.

  2. The debate over immigration and French identity is one of the most controversial questions ...

    After the war the racialization of differences in skin color continued. In 1918 the French government began to expell colonial workers as quickly as possible, judging that the country was not ready to become a multiracial society. After 1918 the French government sent colonial workers home as quickly as possible,

  1. Agenda for change

    are if you look at the previous changes that have been brought about (e.g. Hospital league tables) have not really helped the organisation in any way but instead it has hindered its effort in putting patients above everything else. Doctors set great store by doing their best for patients without the constraints of waiting lists targets or balance sheets.

  2. Have Prior Reforms Of The Lords Been Effective And Can Anything Further Be Done ...

    class males so it is difficult for their views to align with the majority of the British public. In comparison to the US, the judiciary is kept separate to the executive and plays no part in legislation making function, however, they are nominated for positions, such as Supreme Court Justices, by the President.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work