• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the reforms of the constitutional assembly change France?

Extracts from this document...


Jannine Layhe 'How did the reforms of the constitutional assembly change France?' By 1789, much work had been done toward the reforming of France, after the Ancien Regime was abolished. The constitutional assembly was set up, for the making of the constitution, their main aims were to make the citizens of France more equal, abolishing the estates, changing taxation laws, reducing the power of the church, reforming the economy and addressing the local governments. The assembly focused on making France a more humanitarian civilisation, with decentralisation of the government, introducing new d�partements and democracy. The assembly came about because of the need for change after the revolution, and so the more liberal of the nobles joined together and set about this mammoth task. Many of the things the assembly did did a lot for the country but as with everything there were drawbacks. One of the major areas the assembly reformed was the local government. Under the Ancien Regime the local government were quite frankly poorly organised with little power to make change amongst their area, mainly because of the absolute monarchy. Also, under the Ancien Regime, the country was split into g�n�raliti�s, of which there were no clear boundaries, and per each generality was just one intendent, who tended to be ...read more.


Also they decided that priests and bishops had to be elected by the local communities. Another issue they tried to combat was absenteeism, of which they declared that a man of the cloth could not have more than 15 days absent a year, because the government were paying them now to do a job. However the Assembly enforced a signing of an oath to the Church, which caused a huge split throughout the country. The oath basically meant the Church agreed to the changes France was making to the Church. However some priests signed the oath early and it took a while for the Pope to get back to whether he agreed to it or not, when he did get back to them he decided that he didn't and this caused the rift between those who had signed and those who hadn't. Those who did sign were seen to be going against the church, which is where it was felt their loyalty should be, and obviously the villagers of the parish priests who had signed agreed with their priest. This changed France because it meant it was much less religion focused and the Church's power was slipping, as well as the rift because of the oath that had been signed by some. ...read more.


They got rid of torture and as a means to make their society more humane, by introducing the guillotine, which was supposed to be the most humane form of capital punishment at that time. The new system proved itself by reducing the number of crimes dramatically which obviously changed France for the better making it a nicer place to live, especially Paris. The new judiciary made a huge impact in France and stuck for longest, it made France a fairer more equal place to live. Overall France had changed quite drastically, and it was better for some than others for example, the bourgeoisie benefited most because they had the money to buy church land and such, and they were the ones who benefited from the national banking system. They also didn't have the main burden of tax paying, as didn't the poorer people. The nobility and clergy who had benefited before didn't have the same privileges and rights, which made France a fairer place to live for the under classes, but this didn't mean the old upper estates were too pleased. The oath that was signed by half the clergy and the sacking of many of the admin in the church didn't please the French orthodox either, and especially not Rome, when the clergy were asked to remain a part of France and not Rome. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Britain has a constitutional monarchy. The 'constitutional monarchy' is in which the monarch acknowledges ...

    Without the existence of monarchy, the royal building and activities may not be so brilliant and well decorated.

  2. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    Media centralization/concentration in the hands of ever fewer owners threatens the health of quality journalistic output and quality journalistic practice in the country and is also becoming detrimental to journalists' ability to maintain employment. Conclusion It is important to note that although Reza Shah of Iran implemented much of the

  1. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    Ironically, this hybrid mix of a proportional representation system favoured the more unpopular parties, like the Conservatives who ran the 'Think Twice' anti devolution campaign. The 1997 campaign by the Labour party under Tony Blair, and supported by the Liberal Democrat Party, showed how it was not merely an inevitable evolving of government, but a politically contested campaign.

  2. The debate over immigration and French identity is one of the most controversial questions ...

    amount of immigrants, ethnically similar to the french population, didnot garantuee an harmonious coorelation. Although it didn't result in a colour based racism, post war immigration did give reason to a series of new stereotypes and discriminations. At their arrival foreigners discovered a very distinct society, ruled by modernistic and capitalistic values.

  1. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    Deputy Director Chris Lawrence-Pietroni of Charter88 said the legislation works ineffectively in making the House of Lords; this would lack the democratic legitimacy and public confidence to do its job of scrutinising legislation and holding the accountable of government. It is submitted that, although the number of appointed member is increasing but it remains the problem of representative.

  2. To What Extent did the reforms of the Constituent Assembly reshape France?

    All of the divisions were run by elected councils, except the cantons. The voting and election system worked as follows: The active citizens who could vote for municipal officials and vote in national elections had to pay 3 days labour in taxes, anyone who didn't pay this, couldn't vote.

  1. Nationalism in relation to France and Germany.

    and how useful is it?" they challenged the belief of absolutism - the idea that a monarch should have total and absolute power within a state. The French revolution was the most dramatic result of the enlightenment. The enlightenment helped create the intellectual climate which spawned both nationalism and liberalism.

  2. Agenda for change

    From this their recognise the contribution of their workers, while on other hand the NHS already has its strong values. Instead of strengthening these values the government is trying to change the values of the organisation. The reason we are against any sort of changes which are not absolutely necessary

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work