• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How do you account for the Whigs lack of political success in the period 1783-1815

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How do you account for the Whigs lack of political success in the period 1783-1815? There are a number if contributing factors, both long and short term that led to the downfall of the Whig party in the years 1783-1815. Firstly, the Whig party itself had alienated themselves from the King, George III. Unlike Pitt, whose success derived directly from the Kings favour, the Whigs had continued to express their views against royal patronage. The Whigs believed the power of the monarch should be reduced and made no attempt to hide their ambitions, during the regency crisis, that the King would not recover. The Whigs had hoped with the King replaced by the Prince of Wales they would soon be propelled into office. The friendship alliance between the Whig party and the Prince of Wales had brought the party into further disrepute as the reagent had been extremely unpopular with a notorious reputation for exploiting his position in power. ...read more.

Middle

Fox failed to handle the Regency Crisis with care and resulted in the Whigs alienation from the King. Fox also could not control internal conflicts which determined him to be a poor leader. These internal arguments occurred mostly between the older, more conservative Whigs and the younger, more radical Whigs. By 1792 major Whig members such as Portland and Burke left the party saying they could no longer accept the Foxite view that the French revolution was the same as the 'Glorious Revolution' of 1688 and its influence would not spread to Britain. With these important members leaving the party, the Whigs lost support and strength which also became a reason as to why the Whigs suffered a lack of political success between the years 1792-1815. The lack of success by the Whig party was also attributed due to the strength of Pitt and his party. ...read more.

Conclusion

Pitt, who as mentioned was astute, did not just admit these men to the back bench seats but offered them prestigious places as ministers in his cabinet. This subsequently caused a further disintegration of the Whig party in politics between the period 1783-1815. To conclude, the Whigs lack of political success cannot be blamed on an individual issue. A series of events after the start of the 1780's led to Whig party splits and a lack of unity. Unity within the party was essential to take office. The French revolution was a major contributor to the Whigs lack of political success as it ont only weakened the party due to loss of members but also due to the exposure internal party problems. Unable to recover after the events between 1783 and 1815 the Whig party, in contrast to Pitt's success posed no competition to challenge the Tory office. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How close did Britain come to revolution between 1815 and 1821?

    As retaliation for the 'massacre' at Peterloo, the Spenceans plotted to kill leading government ministers - Castlereagh and Sidmouth. Arthur Thistlewood rented a house on Cato Street to start a riot at a dinner. One of the Spencens' meeting was infiltrated by a government spy George Edwards, and so the government was ready and prepared even before the riot started.

  2. What factors do Prime Ministers take into account when choosing their cabinets?

    surely the PM cannot keep up to date with all his current affairs in Europe and America, and still have enough time to overlook individual departments. It is also questionable whether the PM knows sufficient details to comment on the major topics effectively, with all the other jobs surrounding him.

  1. "The defeat of the Whigs in 1841 was solely the result of their own ...

    This essay so far dealt with the issues that the Whigs were unable to deal with and the measures they did not take, which if they did they could have won the general elections in 1841. However, during this period somewhat of a revival of the Conservative Party had taken

  2. Conservative Victory of 1941, Peel and the Weakness of the Whigs.

    The Whigs further caused their own downfall by eliminating the pressure groups which had originally co-operated with the reforming legislation, especially the Evangelicals, Radicals and the Benthamites. Overall, the Whigs were clearly very weak, and never had a strong support to which they could build on, yet under Lord Melbourne,

  1. What was the state of Britain in 1815?

    was owned by wealthy landowners and aristocrats and the peasants worked on their land. The same system had lasted for years until new technological improvements started to come in. These included new machinery, but also the use of new crops, the use of fertilisers such as marl, the start of

  2. Compare the importance of at least three factors, which enabled Pitt to dominate politics ...

    Which later exhilarated into the House of Parliament . Due to reasons such as: his early indications of 'independence' from the hated Fox-North coalition. He developed his own policies, presented them honestly and authoritatively to the commons and expected good preparation and lucid presentation to sway the House to support his government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work