• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective is Parliament in holding the Government to account?

Extracts from this document...


How effective is Parliament in holding the Government to account? Parliament is made up of The House of Lords, the House of Commons and the queen in Parliament. Parliament is the legislature, the government is the executive and the courts are the judiciary. Parliament has many roles, and one of these is holding the government to account. In The House Of Commons, there are many methods of keeping the government to account, these are, 'Standing and select committees, debates, Question time and voting. Also in the House of Lords there are methods of keeping the government to account, these are debating, delaying, amending and voting. Each of the methods inside the Commons and the Lords has limitations, and things, which make them effective in holding the government to account. Each of the methods used in helping hold the government to account has a specific job, and is there for a specific purpose. ...read more.


Question Time is also held, here the Prime Minister and ministers can be asked questions covering issues to do with policies etc, this is effective because the PM and ministers may have to explain their actions. However, the PM/Ministers know the questions in advance so they have a chance to prepare their answers so nothing is spontaneous, also back bench MP's waste time with questions praising the government, ie 'crime rates have been reduced, how have you done this?' Inside the Commons there are often votes on different issues, this means that if the Commons do not support the PM at that time there can be a 'vote-of-no-confidence', usually if this happens the PM will resign. As with many methods used in the Commons, party discipline plays a great role, so most of the governing party MP's always vote with the government, and not against it, even if they don't agree with it. ...read more.


When Labour came into power in 1997 as well as reforming the Commons they reformed the Lords as well. The Lords had become incredibly undemocratic, unrepresentative. Labour limited the hereditary peers to 92, and increased the amount of life peers. Overall, I think that Parliament is partially effective in holding the government to account, but there are three big limitations on parliamentary power, the government has a majority so therefore it can push through whatever legislation's' etc that it wants. The MP's etc sitting in parliament might just be in interested in furthering their own careers, and not actually pay attention to what's really happening. Also the Lord's can not prevent what the government does because of conventions past, Parliament Act, Threat of reform, and the Salisbury Convention stops the Lords. The government holds a lot of power over parliament, if the government really wants to do something, ie pass a legislation or act etc there is little that Parliament can do to stop it, unless there is a 'vote-of-no-confidence'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How effective is Parliament in Controlling the Executive?

    The Opposition will be consulted on bipartisan matters (matters likely to be approved by all parties i.e. fighting terrorism, N.I. peace deal. The Opposition are also given 17 'Opposition Days' a year for debate and criticism of the government, again another method of the legislature scrutinising the executive.

  2. How effective are M.P.'s at scrutinising the Government?

    Also question time has been criticised for being too stage-managed and ritualised. This is because of the use of 'planted questions'. This is where the Prime Minister gets sympathetic M.P.'s to ask him questions, which he already has a planed answer to.

  1. "Debates, Question Time, and Select Committees all give Parliament Teeth." Do you agree?

    However, some things that can help Parliament to scrutinise the Government through Question Time is that issues can be raised to the public, and these can be viewed by anyone in Hansard, similarly to Debates. Also, if the opposition has a strong leader they can be very effective during Question

  2. To what extent does executive dominance over parliament prevent M.P.'s from carrying out their ...

    the majority of bills are sponsored by the executive, and again Private Members Bills often fail at this stage due to the faults as before. M.P.'s can debate bills in the 2nd and 3rd reading, yet M.P.'s are very loyal to their party and often stick to their party lines when voting on bills.

  1. Political accountability -Parliament and the courts

    The ban was investigated by the Employment Select Committee who took oral evidence from the Foreign Secretary, the Secretary of State for Employment, the retired director of GCHQ and the national organisations for civil service unions.

  2. Whether or not Parliament is effective as a government watchdog

    including proposals for expenditure, and to debate the major issues of the day. In carrying out all these functions Parliament helps to bring the relevant facts and issues before the electorateiii. By custom, Parliament is also informed before all-important international treaties and agreements are ratified.

  1. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    For at least a generation, populist thinkers continued to assert that the cause of the people could be furthered without paying any attention to the organisation of government. In fact, they alleged it was dangerous to seize political power because its corrupting nature would inevitably divert the revolutionaries from their fundamental economic task.

  2. Have Prior Reforms Of The Lords Been Effective And Can Anything Further Be Done ...

    Prime Minister Blair primarily favoured the loss of all hereditary peers, but, to have any chance in passing this act through parliament, especially the lords, the act had to be watered down (Guardian.co.uk April 2003 (Lords Reform)). Reform of the lords has always been an important part of Blair's party manifesto.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work