• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective is Parliament? The effectiveness of Parliament can only be ascertained by evaluating individually each measure set up within Parliament to scrutinise government.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How effective is Parliament? The effectiveness of Parliament can only be ascertained by evaluating individually each measure set up within Parliament to scrutinise government. The first is question time. Question time occurs Monday to Thursday and is when ministers of the ruling party answer questions from the opposition and other MP's. The Prime Minister is also required to attend a single session a week lasting at least half an hour in which he must answer questions. This measure is effective because other MP's can directly confront ministers from the ruling party on the policies or decisions they have made. Question time can help to expose weaknesses within ruling parties. Backbenchers are also invited to question time, giving everyone the chance to hold government accountable. Question time has been criticised as being only mildly effective because all questions that are to be asked have to be sent in a week in advance if the MP is to answer it. ...read more.

Middle

This gives them a platform in which to raise issues that reveal the weakness in government and within this period they can call for a vote of no confidence in Parliament. The main criticism of the opposition government is that they exist just for the sake of adversarial politics, they are there to oppose for the sake of opposing. Also they are always responding to what ever topic the ruling government chooses to discuss in parliament apart from the 20 days a year when they get to choose what to discuss and because the are the opposition they are always a minority. This is not more evident ever than in modern day parliament in which Labour has a substantial majority. Thirdly, select committees. Select committees are set up primarily to scrutinise and investigate a government department e.g. Treasury or a particular issue e.g. public accounts and then produces reports on their findings. ...read more.

Conclusion

The majority of members are loyal government MP's therefore only those amendments the government approves of are likely to be adopted. Standing committees are important in that proposed legislation has to be tidied up, clarified and modified. However standing committees lack independence and all their proposals must be approved by the whole House of Commons at the report stage of a Bill. A new committee is created for each Bill and MP's treat them more like chores rather than honours. And finally, debates. Debates are when Parliament discusses government policy, key issues, constituency issues etc. These are effective because they give anyone who wishes to do a chance to criticise government and to introduce new views and to expose government weakness. They are also a chance for backbenchers to criticise government. Debates are lacking because the ruling party chooses what to discuss and unless the government have a small majority they are ineffective. Debates are another example of adversarial politics, pointless arguing with a very low turnout anyway. In conclusion Parliament is effective in a numerous number of ways but each of them is faltered. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How effective is Parliament in holding the Government to account?

    etc, but the debates aren't given much coverage on television etc, and as with select committees MPs are controlled by part discipline.

  2. What means are available to parliament and how effective is its scrutiny of the ...

    to the Prime Minister in advance of the question time, giving him time to consult cabinet colleagues, government advisors, and senior civil servants. Thus because of this time lag between the submission of the proposed questions to the Prime Minister, and the Prime Minister's question time itself, it would be

  1. How effective is Parliament in Controlling the Executive?

    In general, the Lords can hold up most bills they disagree with for about a year but ultimately the elected House of Commons can reintroduce it in the following session and pass it without the Lord's consent. However, Select Committees appear to be far more successful and are one of the best scrutiny mechanisms.

  2. 'The government controls parliament but it cannot always rely on getting its own way.' ...

    Commons, with the exception of that of February 1974 in which Harold Wilson's Labour Party was 34 seats off a majority. Indeed, two-thirds of all elections in this period have returned parties with an adequate majority of 17 seats or more.

  1. Political accountability -Parliament and the courts

    The Government subsequently replies. In their scrutiny of government departments, committees use a variety of working methods. These methods include full inquiries gathering written and oral evidence leading to a published report, a single evidence session to focus attention on a particular issue, informal seminars with experts and asking for written evidence on a minor piece of legislation.

  2. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    This system, however, was not introduced into the Russian provinces of the Empire. The prominent measure of the reign (1842) was little more than a repetition of the law of 1803. Once again, the government insisted that voluntary emancipation must be accompanied by a land-grant to the peasants; once again,

  1. European Parliament

    C. McMillan-Scott Eryl Margaret McNally David W. Martin Bill Milletr Claude Moraes Eluned Morgan Simon Francis Murphy William Francis Newton Dunn James Nicholson Baroness Nicholson Of Winterbourne Barbara O'Toole Ian R. K. Paisley Neil Parish Roy Perry James L.C. Provan John Purvis Imelda Mary Read Brian Simpson Peter William Skinner Struan Stevenson Catherine Stihler Earl Of Stockton

  2. Decentralization and development of modern local government systems in Eastern Europe

    In these countries, too, the possibility to privatize housing was established, but there was no centrally determined obligation for local governments to sell dwellings to tenants or former owners. In these cases local governments have more policy options; they can decide to what extent to privatize as well as strategies for support and development (Heged�s and Tosics 1998, 166).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work