• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective is Parliament? The effectiveness of Parliament can only be ascertained by evaluating individually each measure set up within Parliament to scrutinise government.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How effective is Parliament? The effectiveness of Parliament can only be ascertained by evaluating individually each measure set up within Parliament to scrutinise government. The first is question time. Question time occurs Monday to Thursday and is when ministers of the ruling party answer questions from the opposition and other MP's. The Prime Minister is also required to attend a single session a week lasting at least half an hour in which he must answer questions. This measure is effective because other MP's can directly confront ministers from the ruling party on the policies or decisions they have made. Question time can help to expose weaknesses within ruling parties. Backbenchers are also invited to question time, giving everyone the chance to hold government accountable. Question time has been criticised as being only mildly effective because all questions that are to be asked have to be sent in a week in advance if the MP is to answer it. ...read more.

Middle

This gives them a platform in which to raise issues that reveal the weakness in government and within this period they can call for a vote of no confidence in Parliament. The main criticism of the opposition government is that they exist just for the sake of adversarial politics, they are there to oppose for the sake of opposing. Also they are always responding to what ever topic the ruling government chooses to discuss in parliament apart from the 20 days a year when they get to choose what to discuss and because the are the opposition they are always a minority. This is not more evident ever than in modern day parliament in which Labour has a substantial majority. Thirdly, select committees. Select committees are set up primarily to scrutinise and investigate a government department e.g. Treasury or a particular issue e.g. public accounts and then produces reports on their findings. ...read more.

Conclusion

The majority of members are loyal government MP's therefore only those amendments the government approves of are likely to be adopted. Standing committees are important in that proposed legislation has to be tidied up, clarified and modified. However standing committees lack independence and all their proposals must be approved by the whole House of Commons at the report stage of a Bill. A new committee is created for each Bill and MP's treat them more like chores rather than honours. And finally, debates. Debates are when Parliament discusses government policy, key issues, constituency issues etc. These are effective because they give anyone who wishes to do a chance to criticise government and to introduce new views and to expose government weakness. They are also a chance for backbenchers to criticise government. Debates are lacking because the ruling party chooses what to discuss and unless the government have a small majority they are ineffective. Debates are another example of adversarial politics, pointless arguing with a very low turnout anyway. In conclusion Parliament is effective in a numerous number of ways but each of them is faltered. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How effective is Parliament in holding the Government to account?

    etc, but the debates aren't given much coverage on television etc, and as with select committees MPs are controlled by part discipline.

  2. What means are available to parliament and how effective is its scrutiny of the ...

    to the Prime Minister in advance of the question time, giving him time to consult cabinet colleagues, government advisors, and senior civil servants. Thus because of this time lag between the submission of the proposed questions to the Prime Minister, and the Prime Minister's question time itself, it would be

  1. How effective is Parliament in Controlling the Executive?

    Committees are also put in a difficult position in that; they are likely to be ignored by the government when they divide on party lines, yet will be criticised when they are in consensus. Finally, committees often lack adequate research and administrative resources to make informed conclusions.

  2. "Debates, Question Time, and Select Committees all give Parliament Teeth." Do you agree?

    Also, much like Debates, the Whips have control over what questions are asked, so there are set questions which the Prime Minister will have set, prepared answers for, therefore the whole thing is effectively staged by the Whips. Another factor that makes Question Time somewhat ineffective for the scrutinising of

  1. European Parliament

    C. McMillan-Scott Eryl Margaret McNally David W. Martin Bill Milletr Claude Moraes Eluned Morgan Simon Francis Murphy William Francis Newton Dunn James Nicholson Baroness Nicholson Of Winterbourne Barbara O'Toole Ian R. K. Paisley Neil Parish Roy Perry James L.C. Provan John Purvis Imelda Mary Read Brian Simpson Peter William Skinner Struan Stevenson Catherine Stihler Earl Of Stockton

  2. In what ways and for what reasons are MEPs more free to act then ...

    Due to there being so many different National Parties in the EU there rarely is an influenced majority which leaves the single MEPs with more power to influence the EU. While in Britain the party with the greatest majority run the government leaving the opposing parties with lack of ability

  1. Political accountability -Parliament and the courts

    The parliamentary bodies responsible for scrutiny of each government department are known as departmental select committees. Their role is to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the relevant department and its associated public bodies. The committees determine their own subjects for inquiry; gather written and oral evidence and make reports to the House.

  2. Notes on "Is Parliament still sovereign?"

    Judicial concern about state of power is evident in other areas 8. Incidences of judicial review, by which judges rule that ministers have acted unlawfully have risen 9. An independent Supreme Court will take over judicial role of the H o L from 2009 10.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work