• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective was Peel in restoring and reuniting his party in the period from 1832-1841

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How effective was Peel in restoring and reuniting his party in the period from 1832-1841? The fact that the Conservatives, under Peel, managed to reverse ignominious defeat to Earl Grey's Whigs into resounding electoral success within a decade appears to confirm rather unequivocally the idea that under Peel, his party enjoyed a period of widespread restoration and re-unification. However, as later divisions over the Corn Laws and other issues show, electoral success is not necessarily conclusive evidence of the Conservative's success in redefining themselves, nor accomplishment in healing old divisions within the party. What is more, where there clearly were steps taken forward in these areas, it is often unclear as to the extent to which Peel was himself responsible. This is especially marked when Peel's own attitude towards his party is considered, in that he tended to see them as a tool through which he could carry out his duties to the crown, rather than a role within which the interests of his followers could be more fully represented. However, it would be wrong to the conclude that the Conservatives did not make visible changes in this period which almost certainly increased their public acceptability, as well as the cohesion and efficiency of their party organization, both of which led to success at the polls. ...read more.

Middle

While these divisions certainly aided Peel in his appeals for pragmatic moderation rising above party or political loyalties, they cannot realistically be credited as his doing. At the same time, however, the Conservative's strategy of principled opposition to the Whigs, lending their support to moderates when threatened by their own radical elements, as well as taking a position favourable to the defection of disaffected MPs, most notably in the 'Derby Dilly' of 1834, owes much to the work of Pee/l as leader. The Conservative's ability to propagate their ideas to newly-enfranchised sections of the electorate, and to voice them effectively in the House of Commons was essential in efforts to restore a sense of shared purpose to the party's MPs, as well as to win back public trust. Efforts to do this were led by Sir Thomas Fremantle, appointed the party's chief whip in 1837 along with Lord Stanley and the other Whig defectors, who succeeded in compelling greater numbers of MPs to vote along agreed lines, thus instilling greater levels of discipline in the party which allowed it's opposition to be all the more effective as a single voice. ...read more.

Conclusion

By 1841, the Conservatives enjoyed electoral success, overturning a ruling party at the ballot box for the first time in British history. While this is thanks in no small part to the efforts and leadership of Peel in transforming perceptions of the party, and taking an approach which allowed it to capitalise on Whig discord while maintaining Peel's own principles of pragmatism and cautious reform, such changes were to a large extent superficial. The 1841 election, and Peel's efforts did indeed bring electoral success around a newly energized and well-organized party, hower, the Conservatives' core support continued to be drawn from the counties and small boroughs as it always had been, on a platform of traditional values such as public order and agriculture. While Peel succeeded in uniting and restoring his party to enough of an extent that they were able to reclaim power, what he clearly did not do, nor perhaps attempted to do, was to significantly alter the underlying fabric of the party, nor its motivations or support. This ensured that while enough changes took place to bring the Conservatives back into government, Peel's efforts did not go far enough to ensure the long-term sustainability or unity of the party beyond that point. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    with the industrialist rather than being as statesman that he is often proclaimed to be. The Factory Act (1844) highlighted some of the poorest administration ever seen in Peel time as Prime Minister. The Factory Act didn't get of to a good start within the conservative party this was because

  2. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    a number of occasions to the Anglican church, for example The Society for the Propagation of the Gospel. This clearly sent out a message of the declining influence of the Anglican church that it could no longer collect aid from the state by right; the fact that the Roman Catholic

  1. How Far Did Peel Put Country Before Party?

    This was probably only an excuse, as the people of Ireland did not use corn in their food only potatoes, Peel also knew that the corn prices would not be changed by the removal of the Corn laws. Members of his party also pointed out that he could have temporarily suspended the laws rather than completely remove them.

  2. To What Extent Was Peel's Reorganisation of the Tory Party responsible for the election ...

    Peel, however recognised that by entering Parliament as a minority for the second time, would making him appear as weak and ineffectual as Melbourne had seemed. He would have been robbed of the chance to establish himself as a man of principle hence his bold refusal, much to the surprise and dismay of his party.

  1. Conservative Victory of 1941, Peel and the Weakness of the Whigs.

    The working class population of Britain was further angered by the clear unfairness of the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act - this to put it simply, treated poverty as a crime and forced many people to work in the dreaded warehouses, which could also be known as 'Poor Law Bastilles' due to their harsh working conditions.

  2. Analyse the causes of Mexico's instability in the period 1821-1855

    This was because the 1824 charter did not provide for equality under the law. During the colonial period, the army and the church would have been made to answer to the royal authority, but with such an authority gone and with the lack of a strong nobility, the vacuum was filled with esteemed heroes of the victorious army.

  1. Peel and the Tory party: 1829 - 1841.

    Peel realised that a whole new avenue of middle class support had been opened up by the reform, which he was quick to appeal to. In his 1834 Tamworth Manifesto, Peel stated that he would undertake to govern with the new electorate in mind as long as extra-parliamentary agitation contained

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    More secondments between the public and private sectors were introduced to extend awareness of required management values and help break down the insularity of senior mandarins. Both these innovations continue to operate. Peter Hennessy suggests that by December 1982 when Rayner returned to Marks & Spencer, 130 scrutinies had saved

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work