• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective was Peel in restoring and reuniting his party in the period from 1832-1841

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How effective was Peel in restoring and reuniting his party in the period from 1832-1841? The fact that the Conservatives, under Peel, managed to reverse ignominious defeat to Earl Grey's Whigs into resounding electoral success within a decade appears to confirm rather unequivocally the idea that under Peel, his party enjoyed a period of widespread restoration and re-unification. However, as later divisions over the Corn Laws and other issues show, electoral success is not necessarily conclusive evidence of the Conservative's success in redefining themselves, nor accomplishment in healing old divisions within the party. What is more, where there clearly were steps taken forward in these areas, it is often unclear as to the extent to which Peel was himself responsible. This is especially marked when Peel's own attitude towards his party is considered, in that he tended to see them as a tool through which he could carry out his duties to the crown, rather than a role within which the interests of his followers could be more fully represented. However, it would be wrong to the conclude that the Conservatives did not make visible changes in this period which almost certainly increased their public acceptability, as well as the cohesion and efficiency of their party organization, both of which led to success at the polls. ...read more.

Middle

While these divisions certainly aided Peel in his appeals for pragmatic moderation rising above party or political loyalties, they cannot realistically be credited as his doing. At the same time, however, the Conservative's strategy of principled opposition to the Whigs, lending their support to moderates when threatened by their own radical elements, as well as taking a position favourable to the defection of disaffected MPs, most notably in the 'Derby Dilly' of 1834, owes much to the work of Pee/l as leader. The Conservative's ability to propagate their ideas to newly-enfranchised sections of the electorate, and to voice them effectively in the House of Commons was essential in efforts to restore a sense of shared purpose to the party's MPs, as well as to win back public trust. Efforts to do this were led by Sir Thomas Fremantle, appointed the party's chief whip in 1837 along with Lord Stanley and the other Whig defectors, who succeeded in compelling greater numbers of MPs to vote along agreed lines, thus instilling greater levels of discipline in the party which allowed it's opposition to be all the more effective as a single voice. ...read more.

Conclusion

By 1841, the Conservatives enjoyed electoral success, overturning a ruling party at the ballot box for the first time in British history. While this is thanks in no small part to the efforts and leadership of Peel in transforming perceptions of the party, and taking an approach which allowed it to capitalise on Whig discord while maintaining Peel's own principles of pragmatism and cautious reform, such changes were to a large extent superficial. The 1841 election, and Peel's efforts did indeed bring electoral success around a newly energized and well-organized party, hower, the Conservatives' core support continued to be drawn from the counties and small boroughs as it always had been, on a platform of traditional values such as public order and agriculture. While Peel succeeded in uniting and restoring his party to enough of an extent that they were able to reclaim power, what he clearly did not do, nor perhaps attempted to do, was to significantly alter the underlying fabric of the party, nor its motivations or support. This ensured that while enough changes took place to bring the Conservatives back into government, Peel's efforts did not go far enough to ensure the long-term sustainability or unity of the party beyond that point. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    with the industrialist rather than being as statesman that he is often proclaimed to be. The Factory Act (1844) highlighted some of the poorest administration ever seen in Peel time as Prime Minister. The Factory Act didn't get of to a good start within the conservative party this was because

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Whoever has the most votes at the end of the process wins. The system is used: to elect the Mayor of London. Weaknesses: * SV suffers from all the disadvantages of AV. * Unlike AV, SV does not ensure that the winning candidate has the support of at least 50% of the electorate.

  1. "The defeat of the Whigs in 1841 was solely the result of their own ...

    place under Sir Robert Peel and I feel that this was a major reason as to why the Whigs were defeated. As the reforming impetus of the Whigs began to slow down, the Tories under the leadership of Sir Robert Peel were experiencing a major revival.

  2. How Significant An Event Was the Repeal Of The Corn Laws In The History ...

    Disraeli declined until Stanley did it properly in 1849. The party was also divided over religious toleration, be it for Jews or Catholics, the former being an area where Disraeli naturally preferred to remain silent given the deep-seated prejudices of many of the MPs whose support he really needed.

  1. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    At first, although not joining in on the anti Irish and Catholicism, Peel and the leaders were at least 'wise enough not to disassociate themselves from it'; this split therefore as Stewart puts it was 'papered over'. However, it did not last, the biggest controversy was caused by the Mounoth

  2. Peel and the Tory party: 1829 - 1841.

    However, their bill was beaten by 36 votes in the Commons, which spurred on their departure from government. The situation was perfect for Peel, as he could concentrate on his party and his supporters while the Whigs were tearing themselves and their support apart, exemplified by Lord Graham and Lord Stanley's departure from Melbourne's government.

  1. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    "Asian Values" and the Need for Legitimacy There are many definitions for legitimacy and the theoretical discourse has focused on the different aspects of this crucial yet controversial concept in political science. Max Weber may not be the first to come up with this concept but his conceptionalization of

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    while delivery was to be in the hands of independent executive agencies. Each Executive Agency is headed by a Chief Executive with considerable flexibility to determine the structure and operation of the Agency and the pay, grading and recruitment of personnel.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work