• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did the release of Nelson Mandela in 1990 influence the transition to majority rule in 1994?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

South Africa Coursework Philip Nacmanson 10/0 1: How far did the release of Nelson Mandela in 1990 influence the transition to majority rule in 1994? In February 1990 Nelson Mandela was released from prison after 27 years of imprisonment for terrorism (he was leader of MK the terrorist branch of ANC in the 1960s). Thousands gathered in Cape Town to hear him speak. He began "Friends, comrades, fellow South Africans. I great you in the name of peace, democracy and freedom!" It set out his aims and policies for the future, to unite all South Africans and end Apartheid. He thanked all the people involved in freeing him and explained he was still loyal to the ANC cause. His speech gave new found confidence for Blacks Mandela was elected Deputy President in March. ANC ended their guerrilla war against the state and the exiles returned to South Africa. He was gathering pace in his race to become the first black president in South Africa. At the end of 1991 all the parties agreed to hold a conference to make a new constitution to give democratic rights to everyone in South Africa. It was called CODESA (Convention for a Democratic South Africa). The problem was that deep wounds don't heal completely and the two main parties ANC and the Nationalists disagreed. The ANC wanted a multi-racial, one person and a one-vote democracy immediately. De Klerks nationalists wanted a system that safeguarded white rights but had a multi-racial leadership. ...read more.

Middle

He was essentially a left wing politician but his black supporters were pulling him more and more left and his white 'enemies' were holding him back from falling into communism. He was juggling a lot of people's expectations. Apart from ANC blacks and Nationalist whites, there were the Inkatha Zulu blacks, the Asians and coloured who both had views on how the country should be run. Also outside pressure was on him to succeed in South Africa. A lot was certainly expected of Nelson Mandela. 3: Why, four years later, might (a) some black people and (b) some white people be disappointed by the progress that has been made? As Nelson Mandela's first term in office came to an end in 1998 he announced he would retire leaving control of ANC to deputy president Tharbo Mbeki. It was a time to review what had happened in the last 4 years and what people thought of the government. Whites were surprised. They weren't happy but it wasn't the complete disaster as they expected. Blacks were less likely to attack because they had their party in power and they were improving their lives. But they were angry that the cost was coming entirely out of their pockets. Less educated whites were very, very, very unhappy. Blacks were taking up all the un-skilled and semi-skilled jobs, due to 'positive discrimination'. Positive discrimination was invented to put blacks first. ...read more.

Conclusion

Police dogs have savaged illegal immigrants in supposed 'training exercises'. Racism is still rife in South Africa; indeed there are areas in Johannesburg that if a white man steps foot in it, he will come out in a coffin. This also applies the other way round in other areas. The economy is still slumping and because of that the big companies will not build factories to employ the lower class in South Africa. Crime has risen dramatically. Even to the extreme where most houses are more like fortresses then homes with barbed wire and security cameras. Unemployment has also given the communist and AWB parties more support. What lies in the future of South Africa? It could be a grenade ready to blow up in Thabo Mbeki's face. With an economy spiralling out of control and aids killing off the lower class blacks who are also unemployed and turning to crime there a lot of very unhappy South Africans, black and white. Some Afrikaners are campaigning to set up an independent state in the Orange Free State province to break away from the mess. It is very unlikely that things will sort themselves soon. The next election will be very interesting. If ANC haven't sorted things out by 2002 another party Inkatha, the nationalists even the communists may come to power. Extremists may also try to take over using violence. Whatever the outcome the future of South Africa is set to be as complex, full of problems and maybe as violent as its history. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How far has the release of Nelson Mandela in 1990 influenced South Africa's social, ...

    The Nationalist Party became very extreme and they set out apartheid. Apartheid segregated people into four different groups based on their racial ethnicity: Whites, Blacks, Indians and Coloureds. The different groups were separated off, each with their own homelands and institutions.

  2. South Africa 1945-1994 The end of Apartheid.

    Although this showed how much support the blacks had, it also meant the National Party would now have to work even harder to keep up ahead of them, which they were willing to do, hence it is unfortunate for the blacks.

  1. The ending of white minority rule in South Africa was achieved only because of ...

    He was unable to contribute for 28 years to any campaigns, although he did inspire others. In 1994, he became the first ever black president of South Africa, and helped the former President (De Klerk) destroy Apartheid once and for all.

  2. How far do you agree that the transition from meritocracy to democracy between 1832 ...

    were so under the principle of meritocracy meaning that they would own property themselves and so would what to protect it. Thus only those with property were given the vote and not those involved in revolution, which shows that physical force as a pressure from below if anything hindered the transition to democracy.

  1. HUMANITIES COURSEWORK

    This is his way of justifying the wall. The wall was suggested hoping it would stop violence and terrorists from entering Israel. People from Israel see the wall as a "Security fence" that stops terrorism from entering Israel but also to keep peace between them and the Arabs.

  2. In what ways were the lives of South Africans changed by the policy of ...

    He thought that he needed to change apartheid because the white superiority was fading throughout the world with many black colonies becoming independent nations. He gave the blacks an opportunity to develop on their own, separately from the whites, in their homelands.

  1. How important was the opposition of other countries in bringing apartheid in South Africa ...

    When the marchers refused to disperse, despite warning shots and tear gas, police shot into the crowd killing two and injuring many. Soweto was a trigger for other towns erupting. Demonstrations, riots and violence carried on for many months all around South Africa.

  2. Nationalism as applied to business

    who settle far from home but maintain ties with their homeland; inhabitants remain nationals of their home state but are not literally under the home state's system of government * a group of animals of the same type living together * one of the 13 British colonies that formed the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work