• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

How far do the economic troubles of the interwar years go towards explaining the collapse of Liberalist governments in Europeduring this period?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do the economic troubles of the interwar years go towards explaining the collapse of Liberalist governments in Europe during this period? The economic situation during this period was at best on a fragile basis if not in a state of dislocation, retreat and eventual depression, on a scale never before seen. The breakdown that cumulated in the Great Depression left many questioning if capitalism could ever recover, especially under current yet traditional political systems. Underlying long term economic strife, such as the failure in returning to the Gold Standard, would be one among many a long-standing issue that legitimised the questioning of parliamentary democratic governments. Long-term problems would lead to short-term disaster that would bring about or catalyse their final abolition. This ruthless combination is crucial to understanding how an almost totally 'democratic' Europe of 1918 would be reduced to a handful of survivors by 1939 who themselves had gone through liberalist retreat. These survivors do show that there is not necessarily a direct line between economic trouble, specifically the Great Depression, and the abolition of liberalist government in its entirety. One only has to consider Great Britain as a model of established liberal ideals and stability where one sees only an, albeit sharp, change of government within the confines of the existing political framework. The politics, psychology and social aspects of Europe and its individual countries need to be considered. A succinct examination of Italy serves as a useful introduction to Liberalist collapse as many elements of Italy's fall had parallel themes across Europe. Its uniqueness and indeed early fall from Liberal Democracy (1922) and it inspiration of a system that would engulf Europe within two decades make it worth dealing with in isolation. Italy was caught between the desire for the economic power of Britain, France and Germany in that it was close, yet in reality many factors show it as the poor man of Europe in 1914.1 Thus Italy was set for the strains of war to hit it with arguably unrivalled force. ...read more.

Middle

Deep existing debts meant Europe and specifically Germany could do nothing but default its entire portfolio of loans that America rapidly pulled in. Statistics across boarders and industries began to tell a shattering catalogue of economic ruin typified in the most politically potent economic indicator, unemployment. Historically unmatched economic ruin came at a time of similarly unmatched political power of the masses. By 1933 the Great Depression left the foundations of Liberal economic thinking in ruins. Many, not least Keynes argued that orthodox economic policies were making the Depression worse. Thus Liberal governance in an age of increased importance of public opinion, itself a monument to liberalism's success, was perceived as a farce. Political ramifications could be nothing but dramatic and rapid. Within a few short years the 1920s spirited attempt at returning the world economy to that of 1913 was now unthinkable.4 Outside of fascism and communism the only alternatives were in their infancy and while they could maintain democracy they would still see a big retreat of Liberalist economic thinking. No formal set of policies were in place for a thoroughly convincingly and effective move yet, merely an understanding that this can never be allowed to happen again. Sweden in its social-democratic policy after 1932 and Keynes' General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money in 1936 laid foundation in this direction that would see wide acceptation and success only in post 1945 Europe. Psychologically the Great Depression had a massive impact. Intellectuals, activists and ordinary citizens were united in the belief that something was fundamentally wrong with the liberalist democratic world they lived in.5 Confidence in this world and its institutions of traditional economic expertise was eroded in politically stable nations but collapsed and ended in those less fortunate. People this disillusioned could quite rationally turn to alternatives that only with modern day hindsight seem irrational. Be they communist, fascist or prudent but massive government intervention such as the National Conservative Government's policies in Britain. ...read more.

Conclusion

It could no longer operate within the institutional framework of liberalist government. Only through force and authoritarianism could it maintain itself, fascism being one of several methods for this. Whether this was the case or not is generally irrelevant in an age of mass politics perception and belief became a greater force for change then fact and truth. In an age of both attempted proportional representation and an irreconcilable Left and Right it is not surprising to see Democracy in Austria, Germany and Spain fall under these pressures. In some otherwise stable democracies opposing ethnic, race or religious peoples within a state would see the demise of their governments as in the case of Czechoslovakia in the 1930s. Economic trouble cumulating in the Great Depression was the fuel and more often then not the spark that set the stage for Liberal collapse. In the ensuing fire Liberalist economics had to jump, whether liberalist government jumped next was dependant on the formers ability to control the firestorm. Peaceful change rested on both the level of assurance afforded to the political system by its citizens and confidence in itself. Innate to Democracy's legitimacy is its sense of evolution from within its own peoples and nations. Few of interwar Europe's democracies enjoyed this level of establishment thus their citizens at best had a shallow affinity with it. Government's existence rested solely on economic success as only that could reconcile a politically disenchanted people. The pillars of nineteenth Century economy had profound and system damaging effects on nation's politics in the 1920s and 1930s. Government's enshrined role to only check the power of institutions gave them no mechanism to take their command in peacetime. The attempt to return to a world built up on free trade, laissez-faire economics and minimal political intervention had little hope of functioning when government came to be required as the engine of society. It was designed as nothing more then the breaks.15 With the collapse of wealth in the Great Depression or at least the collapse of the framework to keep generating it the end of liberalist government was certain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Why did Mussolini come to power in 1922?

    In July of 1922, the socialist trade unions went on strike in an attempt to compel the government to deal with the growing fascist violence and intimidation. This again played into Mussolini's hands and he was able to impress the middle classes by supposedly 'dealing with the situation'.

  2. Japanese Political Timeline (1919).

    Comparison with Hitler's Germany .. The development in 1930s for both Japanese and the Germans were similar that both countries had managed their country as a totalitarian state. The preconditions that they begin with was: an economic slump and chaos.

  1. How successful were the Labour governments of 1924 and of 1929-31?

    although it must be noted that the sum was not exceptionally high. With foreign policy, Labour seemed to achieve more success than on the domestic side. MacDonald saw himself as a 'mediator' in European affairs, and by 1924, MacDonald had a fair degree of success in the international 'arena'.

  2. Outline the political, social and economic problems facing the Weimar Republic in the years ...

    The situation changed after the French, realising that Germany was deliberately evading reparations payments, decided to go claim the payments by force and occupied the Ruhr district in January 1923. The German government tried at first to resist and retaliate, but soon found this impossible.

  1. Why Did Revolutions Break Out so Widely Across Europe in 1848 and Why Did ...

    Conflicts of interest immediately appear, since the capitalist factory owners, no matter their political beliefs, would not want their workers rising in rebellion since it would lose them profits, nor would the urban workers take kindly to peasant revolts that would cut off their food supplies.

  2. How far has the release of Nelson Mandela in 1990 influenced South Africa's social, ...

    Eventually they agreed after being reassured that the Zulu monarchy would continue. Despite many fears of violence, the election went peacefully. This was the first time that 16 million black people could vote. This election meant so much to so many of the people and many ended up walking up to 60 miles and queuing for hours just to vote.

  1. The Creation of the Welfare State

    In Source H it clearly states that the amount of money spent on housing has increased, from 42.3 million pounds in 1935 to 83.5 in 1955. However, the houses built were poorly built according to 'Towards Prosperity' by BBC Publications in 1970 which stated that " families lived in crowded

  2. The Negative Impact Of World War 1 On Italy: Weaknesses Of The Liberal State, ...

    Those on the 'right' of politics increased in number and became more extreme in their views as they felt that the Liberals were too weak and indecisive to be able to protect their interests. Instead of crushing the 'socialist threat' the Liberal governments appeared weak, offering concessions to workers in order to stop the strikes and riots.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work