• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that economic concerns were the main reason why governments enacted social reforms towards the poor between 1830 and 1914?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that economic concerns were the main reason why governments enacted social reforms towards the poor between 1830 and 1914? Between 1830 and 1914 the social reforms which British governments enacted to tackle poverty, changed dramatically causing a paternalistic state to transform into a strictly utilitarian society which in turn evolved into the foundations of a welfare state. As source one indicates, many claim that these dramatic changes were the reaction to economic concerns such as the poor rate and Britain's Great Depression. However, as source 3 clearly implies, there is a strong argument that other factors of political, external or social nature had a greater impact on why government attitudes and responses to the poor changed. Economic concerns had a crucial influence on social reforms enacted by the government as economic suffering appears to be the basis of many changes in government action towards the poor. The accumulating total of the poor rate (which by 1829 had peaked at � 6,758,000) resulted in aggravating the upper and middle classes who, as Source 1 implies found that giving money to the poor caused 'indolence and vice' and actually harmed the poor rather than helped them. ...read more.

Middle

However, therefore it is apparent that economic concerns were not the motivation behind changes in government treatment and acted as problems to be solved rather than the reason why the government changed its policies. In order to be able to understand how the government transformed so radically one must be aware of the political, external and social climate between 1830 and 1914. Political factors played a key role in the reasons why governments enacted social reforms between 1830 and 1914. The expansion of the electorate in 1832, 1867 and 1884 meant that the government had to tailor their policies to please their voters. Especially in 1884 when the franchise was extended to the majority of British males, including those of working class background, the government needed to offer a service which would keep them in power. Therefore one must be aware that although economic concerns were the area which the government targeted, they were not the main reason to why governments changed their social policies. Fear of revolution in 1830 also meant that government limited social reforms as a measure of control and in 1900, as source 3 suggests, the fear of socialism which surfaced in Britain as the Labour Party was another major reason for government action. ...read more.

Conclusion

for example as source 2 indicates with more specific classification of those suffering economic hardship such as children and the elderly, the government were able target their policies to ease economic suffering; for instance the issuing the National Insurance Act 1911 to tackle poverty at old-age. As in the 1830s these social reformers along with others such as Dickens contributed to the growing discomfort of the higher social classes that the government were not doing enough to help the poor. Therefore social elements added to the climate in which the government was forced to act through social reforms whether they restricted or greatened the conditions of those in poverty. In conclusion, it is clear that although economic concerns were of great importance and did have many strong effects they were the areas which the government had to tackle rather than the main reason behind why social reforms were enacted. The majority of social reforms issued by governments were not based on genuine concern for the economic suffering of the popular, they were reactions to political crises and played the role of giving the government power. Without political and external motivation one cannot assume that the government would have responded to the economic situation of Britain, even with the help of social reformers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How far has the release of Nelson Mandela in 1990 influenced South Africa's social, ...

    There are now training programmes in place but the poorly educated blacks are still a problem, and will remain that way for a long time. There have been attempts of starting trade unions, but wage gaps remain wide between managers and workers.

  2. What impact did Mao have on the lives of the Chinese people from 1949 ...

    Social Changes Mao Zedong also made some important social changes. These greatly benefited women's rights. In April 1950, a Marriage Law was introduced. Arranged marriages, the marriage of children, the killing of unwanted girl babies and bigamy were all made illegal.

  1. How successful were the Labour governments of 1924 and of 1929-31?

    most of the constructive advances in economic policy to the present day'. This failure was then enforced by MacDonald's decision to appoint himself in charge of unemployment policy when he did not have real plans or a policy to proceed with.

  2. Peel 'The Great Betrayer Of his Party' - How Far Do You Agree?

    by giving �30000 for its rebuilding and increasing its annual grant from the government. The aim of this was to win the support from the Catholic Priests because they were important in educating the peasantry and were also important political spokesmen.

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    Due to these negotiations that took place between Malta and Sicily, we could also had the increase in contraband and fraud, especially regarding the artillery and mass ammunition. After the Italian Unification in October 1860 we had a clash between the Italians exiles in Malta, between the Bourbon sympathisers, who wanted a Bourbon King to rule Malta and the revolutionaries.

  2. How far do you agree that it was Cavour's diplomacy rather that Garibaldi's ideas ...

    One of Cavour's major contributions to Unification was gaining international acknowledgment for the cause. He did so by encouraging Piedmont to join the Crimean War on the side of the British and French. Although Piedmont's contribution in the Crimea was minimal, this event alone contributed much to the success of Unification.

  1. 'How far had the British Government abandoned the policy of laissez-faire by 1914?'

    cut to 8 hours, in certain sweated trades the trade board set up boards to control wages and working conditions.

  2. It is not enough for governments to have power, they must also have authority

    In this way the state can exercise its will without facing a physical challenge, this certainly gives the state the power to impose its will and physically, the state does not require authority to make decisions as it cannot be opposed in this way.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work