• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far does the evidence in the sources suggest that the Peterloo Massacre in Manchester in 1819 was caused by political activists exciting discontent?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Rebecca Johnson How far does the evidence in the sources suggest that the Peterloo Massacre in Manchester in 1819 was caused by political activists exciting discontent? Carlisle was actually at the scene of the Massacre making the source more reliable, but he is on the speaker's side making the source less reliable. He uses emotive language to suggest that the Yeomanry had a 'thirst for blood.' Implying that the Yeomanry attacked without good reason and shows that he is biased in his view of the Peterloo Massacre. Source 2 implies that the Yeomanry 'galloped' onto the field and he says that the meeting was like a 'gala day'. The source says there were women and children at St. ...read more.

Middle

The next source is an artist's impression of the Peterloo Massacre by Cruikshank, who did not attend the meeting. The artist is clearly on the speaker's side as he has shown the Yeomanry looking very violent and waving their swords in the air as if ready to strike and the crowd are defenceless. The artist has done the painting based on the evidence of people who did attend the event. The next source is from the Manchester Observer, produced five days following the event. Wroe is on the speaker's side as he uses emotive language against the Yeomanry to exaggerate their actions and cause the readers to be taken in so that the papers are sold. ...read more.

Conclusion

This in a sense shows how different people's views were of the event, but there is more evidence suggesting that the Yeomanry made the event worse. It is clear that the evidence in source 5 suggests that activists exciting discontent caused the Peterloo Massacre. In conclusion even though all of the sources are not completely reliable on a whole they still seem to suggest that activists exciting discontent didn't cause the Peterloo Massacre. The government may have overreacted as they had fears of revolution and after the events in France there had also been other protests. However all of these had concluded peacefully; therefore the outcome could be expected to have been peaceful. The fact that the speakers were found guilty suggests that the government were trying to cover up their responsibility. If the speakers hadn't been found guilty then the Yeomanry would have been guilty of murder. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Northern Ireland Sources Question

    In 'A' and 'B' they wanted to maintain public morale they did not want the public to panic. They also did not want to be seen in a bad light this is why they said the fire service coped well while we know that from source 'D' that the fire service were completely inadequate for the task that faced them.

  2. Sharpeville Massacre Sources Question

    2b) The differences between sources A and B are probably largely due to the different 'spin' that their respective writers wished to put on events. This means that while Source A is a simple description of all the facts at hand, leading up to the shootings, Source B goes out of

  1. Why was there popular discontent between 1815-1822? How was it expressed and did the ...

    This form of tax, as it is linked to the amount you earn, takes most money from the richest people in society. Needless to say this was highly unpopular amongst the wealthy landowners and businessmen (both of whom had considerable influence over parliament.)

  2. Using your own knowledge and the evidence of Sources 1, 3 and 5 what ...

    there had been no better candidate than Cromwell to become Protector, he had the political skill and had been involved in politics since the 1640's. Moreover, Cromwell's alliance with the army was able to provide a link between Parliament and the army, thus hope for a compromise to be reached.

  1. Civil Service Reform.

    1994 were allegedly asked to research speeches of ex-ministers then at odds with John Major and to research ministers party conference speeches. The clearest evidence of the dilemmas faced by civil servants was revealed by the Scott Inquiry into the arms sales to Iraq, when several ministers were publicly re-stating

  2. Indian independence - source based work with the sources.

    The Japanese were on the borders of India and could invade it. Then the Indian people could forget the question of independence. But if they helped Britain fight the Japanese then they could start talking about independence as was promised to them.

  1. Belfast Air Raid Sources Questions

    The comparison of these pieces just shows the extent of censorship the government went to to keep the people of the city happy. 3. Source 'D' is very useful in supporting the evidence in source 'E'. Source D's origin is a confidential report using official figures and is an accurate and reliable source.

  2. To what extent can political discontent in the period 1875 -1931 be explained by ...

    This would therefore give the Spanish people a greater sense of responsibility to break free of their backward lifestyle. Canovas had two main principles, the first was to exclude the army from political power and the second was to on no occasion trust to free elections.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work