• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far does the evidence in the sources suggest that the Peterloo Massacre in Manchester in 1819 was caused by political activists exciting discontent?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Rebecca Johnson How far does the evidence in the sources suggest that the Peterloo Massacre in Manchester in 1819 was caused by political activists exciting discontent? Carlisle was actually at the scene of the Massacre making the source more reliable, but he is on the speaker's side making the source less reliable. He uses emotive language to suggest that the Yeomanry had a 'thirst for blood.' Implying that the Yeomanry attacked without good reason and shows that he is biased in his view of the Peterloo Massacre. Source 2 implies that the Yeomanry 'galloped' onto the field and he says that the meeting was like a 'gala day'. The source says there were women and children at St. ...read more.

Middle

The next source is an artist's impression of the Peterloo Massacre by Cruikshank, who did not attend the meeting. The artist is clearly on the speaker's side as he has shown the Yeomanry looking very violent and waving their swords in the air as if ready to strike and the crowd are defenceless. The artist has done the painting based on the evidence of people who did attend the event. The next source is from the Manchester Observer, produced five days following the event. Wroe is on the speaker's side as he uses emotive language against the Yeomanry to exaggerate their actions and cause the readers to be taken in so that the papers are sold. ...read more.

Conclusion

This in a sense shows how different people's views were of the event, but there is more evidence suggesting that the Yeomanry made the event worse. It is clear that the evidence in source 5 suggests that activists exciting discontent caused the Peterloo Massacre. In conclusion even though all of the sources are not completely reliable on a whole they still seem to suggest that activists exciting discontent didn't cause the Peterloo Massacre. The government may have overreacted as they had fears of revolution and after the events in France there had also been other protests. However all of these had concluded peacefully; therefore the outcome could be expected to have been peaceful. The fact that the speakers were found guilty suggests that the government were trying to cover up their responsibility. If the speakers hadn't been found guilty then the Yeomanry would have been guilty of murder. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Northern Ireland Sources Question

    In 'A' and 'B' they wanted to maintain public morale they did not want the public to panic. They also did not want to be seen in a bad light this is why they said the fire service coped well while we know that from source 'D' that the fire service were completely inadequate for the task that faced them.

  2. Sharpeville Massacre Sources Question

    2b) The differences between sources A and B are probably largely due to the different 'spin' that their respective writers wished to put on events. This means that while Source A is a simple description of all the facts at hand, leading up to the shootings, Source B goes out of

  1. Using your own knowledge and the evidence of Sources 1, 3 and 5 what ...

    Cromwell stressed that he was "ready to serve...as a constable", implying that he wanted to guide England towards godliness, he was able to do this to an extent because of his leadership skills. Although there were tensions between Parliament and army, Cromwell was able to reduce the friction as shown

  2. Why was there popular discontent between 1815-1822? How was it expressed and did the ...

    Therefore in 1816 parliament voted to abolish the tax. However it was soon discovered by the treasury that the missing revenue was not sustainable. The government therefore decided that, rather that replace the income tax system, they would increase the tax on everyday goods such as beer and sugar.

  1. To what extent can political discontent in the period 1875 -1931 be explained by ...

    The demotion of the army was achieved relatively easily, many Spaniards blamed the "troubles and upheavals of the last thirty years"7 on the army; the victory in the Carlist wars had given the army some prestige, however this had been lost over the years.

  2. Indian independence - source based work with the sources.

    In source A Gandhi says ' how can we fight for democracy when we have not got it ourselves'. He is only thinking of this from one point of view. If he had thought about it from another point of view he would know that the Indians were not fighting for Britain but for India.

  1. Using the evidence of Sources 2, 3 and 5, and your own knowledge explain ...

    This shows that the abandonment of the godly cause was a major reason as to why Cromwell rejected the crown. In addition, "the Providence of God" was a further vital consideration into rejecting the crown. God had already expressed his dissatisfaction with Cromwell by causing the failure of the Western Design.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    The Conservative government also argued that the agency system made government more open by publicly setting out targets. The culture of the agencies has also been claimed to have transformed the attitude of civil servants, with individuals with whom they deal now seen as 'customers' with rights to an efficient and effective service.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work