• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far does the evidence in the sources suggest that the Peterloo Massacre in Manchester in 1819 was caused by political activists exciting discontent?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Rebecca Johnson How far does the evidence in the sources suggest that the Peterloo Massacre in Manchester in 1819 was caused by political activists exciting discontent? Carlisle was actually at the scene of the Massacre making the source more reliable, but he is on the speaker's side making the source less reliable. He uses emotive language to suggest that the Yeomanry had a 'thirst for blood.' Implying that the Yeomanry attacked without good reason and shows that he is biased in his view of the Peterloo Massacre. Source 2 implies that the Yeomanry 'galloped' onto the field and he says that the meeting was like a 'gala day'. The source says there were women and children at St. ...read more.

Middle

The next source is an artist's impression of the Peterloo Massacre by Cruikshank, who did not attend the meeting. The artist is clearly on the speaker's side as he has shown the Yeomanry looking very violent and waving their swords in the air as if ready to strike and the crowd are defenceless. The artist has done the painting based on the evidence of people who did attend the event. The next source is from the Manchester Observer, produced five days following the event. Wroe is on the speaker's side as he uses emotive language against the Yeomanry to exaggerate their actions and cause the readers to be taken in so that the papers are sold. ...read more.

Conclusion

This in a sense shows how different people's views were of the event, but there is more evidence suggesting that the Yeomanry made the event worse. It is clear that the evidence in source 5 suggests that activists exciting discontent caused the Peterloo Massacre. In conclusion even though all of the sources are not completely reliable on a whole they still seem to suggest that activists exciting discontent didn't cause the Peterloo Massacre. The government may have overreacted as they had fears of revolution and after the events in France there had also been other protests. However all of these had concluded peacefully; therefore the outcome could be expected to have been peaceful. The fact that the speakers were found guilty suggests that the government were trying to cover up their responsibility. If the speakers hadn't been found guilty then the Yeomanry would have been guilty of murder. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Northern Ireland Sources Question

    In 'A' and 'B' they wanted to maintain public morale they did not want the public to panic. They also did not want to be seen in a bad light this is why they said the fire service coped well while we know that from source 'D' that the fire service were completely inadequate for the task that faced them.

  2. Sharpeville Massacre Sources Question

    2b) The differences between sources A and B are probably largely due to the different 'spin' that their respective writers wished to put on events. This means that while Source A is a simple description of all the facts at hand, leading up to the shootings, Source B goes out of

  1. Using the evidence of Sources 2, 3 and 5, and your own knowledge explain ...

    lasting political settlement in the years 1653-58 was due to the Protectorate's 'fatal internal contradictions'. Cromwell became Lord Protector in December 1653, and was eager to dedicate himself to heal old wounds and to establish a stable government by securing the majority support.

  2. Using your own knowledge and the evidence of Sources 1, 3 and 5 what ...

    that Cromwell was a significant factor in the stability and the survival of the Protectorate. But, there is debate amongst historians as to how vital Cromwell was to the stability and existence of the Protectorate. Cromwell's personality and ambitiousness was a factor which the Protectorate relied upon, at the time

  1. Indian independence - source based work with the sources.

    He says the army and police are powerless as the police were defecting and joining in the violence thus making it impossible to get under control. 'The most disturbing feature here is the defection of the police who are mostly Muslim'.

  2. Why was there popular discontent between 1815-1822? How was it expressed and did the ...

    Not only did these laws impact the vast majority of people personally, as they were forced to spend a greater proportion of their income on food, but they also impacted on the economy, as less disposable income means lower sales for other sections of the market (for example textiles.)

  1. Civil Service Reform.

    To clear 65% of Social Fund Community Care grant applications in 7 days and 95% in 20 days. To clear 71% of Income Support Claims within 5 days and 90% within 13 days. To clear 65% of Sickness and Invalidity Benefit Claims within 10 days and 95% within 30 days.

  2. To what extent can political discontent in the period 1875 -1931 be explained by ...

    This would therefore give the Spanish people a greater sense of responsibility to break free of their backward lifestyle. Canovas had two main principles, the first was to exclude the army from political power and the second was to on no occasion trust to free elections.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work