• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'How far had the British Government abandoned the policy of laissez-faire by 1914?'

Extracts from this document...


Essay 2 Lauren Ford 5R2 'How far had the British Government abandoned the policy of laissez-faire by 1914?' 100 years ago 3/4 of the population in Britain were merely working class, 1/3 were living in severe poverty. Life expectancy was short and infant mortality rates were absurd, in Scotland 13 out of every 100 babies would die before they reached the age of one. The government and many rich, prosperous people believed in 'Self help not State help', many possessed the saying of 'heaven helps those who help themselves.' Overall, in their opinion it was up to the individuals to look after themselves. Many things contributed to the Government finally realising that Britain was at a stage where state intervention was greatly needed. The colossal divide in social classes in the 1800s to early 1900s resulting in many people falling in to great poverty highlighting the lack of efficiency in the Governments laissez-faire ideology. The findings of Booth and Rowntree lead to a national uproar at the high number of people in Britain living without a decent house and enough money to feed a family for a week. By the year 1914, the British Government had abandoned the policy of laissez-faire to a certain extent. ...read more.


On the other boat, help was needed for the unemployed and so in 1911 the National Insurance Act was passed. This was the most radical reform of all and was a major break through in social reform. It worked in two parts; (i) the sickness insurance benefits, which entitled workers to 10s. per week for a period of up to 26 weeks for health reasons and medical treatment for free from a selected doctor. Money to provide this service to workers came from 4d a week from workers, 3d a week from employers and 2d a week from the state. So really the majority of money wasn't being provided by the state! (ii) The unemployment benefits- a certain amount of weeks had to be worked before you could receive any benefits, again you could only claim for up to 26 weeks and those cyclical workers e.g. house builders were not covered because it was classed as seasonal work. At this stage the friendly societies, which provided help for the poor, were almost put out of business buy the N.I Acts. Although, these friendly societies did eventually recover to help those workers who were not covered by the government's national insurance policy. ...read more.


This opposition was the Conservative Party and the upper class that didn't see a problem with laissez-faire as the problem of poverty and ill health did not really ever involve them, and if it did they could afford the doctors bills. The upper classes were also basically excluded from the liberal reforms because most of the policies introduced did not effect their lifestyle. To conclude, the British Government had only abandoned the laissez-faire policy by 1914 to a certain extent. By 1914, I feel that the Liberals had created a series of stepping-stones and foundations on which they could eventually build up a full welfare state. They had introduced various acts that brought state help along to the children, the elderly, the employed, the unemployed, the sick and the needy. However the state help provided by the British Government did not cover everyone in the country, people were excluded from the benefits (the prosperous) and therefore were still living by the old laissez-faire policy. The acts and policies introduced although bringing along various good points and benefits did come with a variety of problems that needed to be solved along with budget problems. And so, overall the British government still had various problems and issues to resolve before they could fully abandon the laissez-faire policy and take on Lloyd George's long needed ideological policy of 'The Welfare State.' ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    Likewise, Atat�rk insisted on cutting links with the past that he considered anachronistic. Titles of honor were abolished. The wearing of the fez, which had been introduced a century earlier as a modernizing reform to replace the turban, was outlawed because it had become for the nationalists a symbol of the reactionary Ottoman regime.

  2. Free essay

    Consider the view that the liberal government reforms 1906-1914 were more concerned with the ...

    The fact that there had all of a sudden grown a strong emergence of the labour party in the house of commons is extremely important when it comes to arguing that social reforms passed in this period were concerned with the maintenance of Edwardian society.

  1. The Creation of the Welfare State

    Some extremely poor children had ended up staying with a generally wealthy family and some maybe vice versa but they were never really organised on whom who goes to they were just given houses, this was a good experience for both host and evacuee, they came to learn how they both live and socialize.

  2. What immigration policy should Britain have?

    a lot of money and most people wouldn't be able to afford it. In my opinion the best thing for the British government to do would be to use the 'one in, one out' policy. I think this would be the best idea because it doesn't interfere with the population.

  1. There are many different issues of disagreement between the British government and American ...

    It argued that parliament derived its authority from the constitution and could not overstep its limits and insisted that the Townshend Duties infringed American rights since the colonists were represented not in parliament but only in their own assemblies. 9 Parliament saw in these letters the seeds of rebellion and reacted strongly.

  2. 'Asses the success of the Liberals from 1906-1914 in dealing with their domestic problems.'

    unrest, with days lost escalating to 41 million, in 1914 and the Suffragettes continuing with their violent protests. Actions such as 'The Cat and Mouse Act' and force-feeding were a shrewd way of dealing with the Suffragettes but could be seen as inhumane towards the women.

  1. 'Liberal pluralist views of policy making are hopelessly naïve.' Discuss.

    Pluralists neglect the interests and actions of government, namely they do not recognize the will and ability of government to control policy-making in order to fulfill its own interests and goals. Pluralists believe power of groups depends on the level of their resources.

  2. Were the policy intentions of the Thatcher governments assisted or hindered by the structure ...

    Inherent in the latter was the restoration of Victorian values such as patriotism, discipline, order and authority. The context in which the Thatcher opposition, and then government, formulated their policy intentions is important in understanding how they were received by the electorate and institutions of the state.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work