• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far had the Liberal Governments of Italy gone to solve Italy's problems by 1914?

Extracts from this document...


How far had the Liberal Governments of Italy gone to solve Italy's problems by 1914? The formation of "Italy" in 1870 saw the birth of a nation and the start of its struggle against the odds; a succession of Liberal Governments had the task of steering them through the stormy weather. When the state of "Italy" was formed it faced many problems these can be put into 5 separate problems, however they were all interlocking. In this piece I will explore the many problems faced by Italy and look at the great stride forwards made by the Liberal Governments of Italy to reduce their effects. First we have to define the notion of the Italian Liberal Governments, by definition they should pursue the 19th century ideology associated with strong support for a broad interpretation of civil liberties for freedom of expression and religious toleration, for widespread popular participation in the political process, and for the repeal of protectionist legal restrictions inhibiting the operation of a capitalist, free market economy. Or to put it simply take the middle road on most issues, encourage people to vote and breed an atmosphere of tolerance. The Liberal Italian governments knew that the vast majority of Italians were not loyal to any all Italy state there was a culture of "localism" in which people were far more ready to fight for their town than any national government headed by people based 150 miles away. There was the problem of dialects and communication problems, only 2% of the population actually spoke Italian the others spoke languages from their region. ...read more.


However in 1911 they fought Turkey and won the country of Libya, this was seen by some as a defining moment and the start of Italian greatness others saw it as a pointless war in which Italians died. Also, the fact that Austria-Hungary still held the Italia Irrendenta was a matter of national humiliation on the part of Italians and especially amongst the newly formed Nationalists. The political landscape of Italy had changed over the period since Unification and it had split to two extremes, you had the Left-Wing Socialists and the Right-Wing Nationalists. This meant a polarisation in government, in the press and amongst the people. The Liberals still had the majority of support in elections but the socialists gained support from disgruntled workers and the Nationalists enjoyed the votes of the influential wealthy middle and upper classes. These splits in political persuasion saw more and more alienation between the government and the people and the people themselves were polarising and isolating themselves into different groups. However, the fact that a Nationalist movement had grown up meant that The government continued to try and please everyone and in doing so pleased no one. The relationship between unions, workers and peasants is a prime example. In industrial disputes the government, under Giolitti took a neutral stance; this was an improvement on the former policy of siding with the factory workers and sending in the army, however it did little to improve the workers view of the government. The government did instigate one rest day per week for all workers and brought in legislation to lower taxes on food and provide anti-malaria drugs, free of charge to areas affected by the disease. ...read more.


To conclude the Liberal government endeavoured to solve the problems it found itself with after Unification, however the problems were too much for the government to fulfil its own mandate and promises to the people. A newly formed state such as Italy could not solve the problems it faced in just 50 years. The comparison between it and Britain is a little unfair as Britain as a collection of states had been formed for over 300 years. The Liberal governments did almost the best any government with its ideals could of, and its political persuasion does to some extent have an effect on its handling of Italy's problems. A far right government may have been quicker to quash socialist upsurge, and it may well have gone to war a lot sooner than the liberals did. A government verging to the left may have insisted the landowners redistribute the land and they may have put more money into education schemes. The problems of Italy were of course not solved but the problems of any country are never solved. The overriding theme of the Liberal governments was not to intervene too much but not at the expense of leaving things to fall apart. The ideal of this kind of politics is A Third Way, in which you please enough people enough of the time to form effective government. The Liberal Governments grew Italy into a country in its own right, but did they leave enough of their own problems for it to be susceptible to extremists? 1 'Fascist Italy' John Hite and Chris Hinton Martin Fox Ridley12 26.09.'02 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. It is not enough for governments to have power, they must also have authority

    In this way the state can exercise its will without facing a physical challenge, this certainly gives the state the power to impose its will and physically, the state does not require authority to make decisions as it cannot be opposed in this way.

  2. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    Hence much of their political control over their constituencies is handed over to their local henchmen, who in turn exercise control over local administration as well (not unlike absentee landlordism of past eras). When the time comes to distribute the booties of an electoral victory, there are obviously more candidates

  1. What problems did Italy face after the First World War?

    Mussolini signed up in the war, and was wounded. After returning in Milan on March 23, 1919 he formed the Fasci di Combattimento. At first Mussolini was supported by the liberals in parliament, he introduced strict censorship and altered the election system to destroy all other political parties. Mussolini gained support-using propaganda with press and newspapers and public speeches,

  2. Apartheid in South Africa.

    The word 'forcibly' is biased because Dr Verwoerd could easily be saying that so anyone who does not know what happened from personal experience could be completely ignorant to the truth. Also, it is a generalisation i.e. saying that every one of the protesting Africans set out with violent intentions.

  1. How far do you agree that it was Cavour's diplomacy rather that Garibaldi's ideas ...

    Therefore she can judge the issues more objectively. On the other hand, Liberal historians such as Trevelyan writing in 1909, and are less able to look at events so objectively, and admire Garibaldi, for being flexible but never failing to forget his original aim.

  2. 'We have made Italy, now we must make Italians' How successful had the Liberal ...

    Instability effected the Italian people as a result and saw the trasformismo tactic employed by the government as immoral and corrupt. Italy faced many economic problems. There was government debt, high taxes on the poor. In addition the North-South divide was increasing by the industrialisation of the north and there

  1. The Government's Aim to begin a severe crackdown on knife related crime

    families of young people murdered on the U.K streets and the Damilola trust fund. They were both sickened by the rising number of killings. The marches from the south and north met at Piccadilly Circus and erupted into deafening applause.

  2. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    challenged and the leaders continuously fear the threat of being overthrown as people fail to obey the state laws and institutions. Another reason for hostility is that the leaders in this region did not gain legitimacy through popular vote nor were they divinely elected and therefore they were seen as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work