• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Lord Liverpool's government directly responsible for the popular unrest of the years 1815-1820?

Extracts from this document...


Natalya Frederick 12BW How far was Lord Liverpool's government directly responsible for the popular unrest of the years 1815-1820? Although much of the legislation passed and many of the tactics used by Lord Liverpool's government in response to the unrest in the years 1815-1820 aggravated the situation, they were not directly responsible for the popular discontent. Some of the reasons for discontent pre-dated the Liverpool administration. Lord Liverpool's government took office in 1812, when the Luddite movement was already at its peak - the first major and open displays of radical discontent. Not only did industrialisation cause new technological advances to replace workers, but the remaining workers (particularly in major cities) experienced worsening working conditions and lower pay at the hands of ruthless employers who wanted to meet the increasing demand for heavy goods. Another reason for discontent that was largely beyond government control, was the population growth of the time and the subsequent migration to newly industrialised urban areas for employment opportunities. The high population in poor urban areas resulted in social problems such as poor sanitation, squalor, disease and over-crowding. These problems were exacerbated by the end of the Napoleonic war, which marked the end of the economic 'boom' period that the country had enjoyed due to demands on the armament and other war associated industries, causing acute depression to hit soon after. ...read more.


The radicals added to the social unrest through the stirring of discontent and indicating to the working classes that by pressing the government for political reform, an end to their problems would come, thus encouraging them to participate in Radical activity. For example, the Luddite movement and Spa Field Riots (open-air meetings as a form of protest). Lord Liverpool's response to the popular unrest further aggravated the situation. The introduction of the Corn Law in 1815 was in order to guarantee landowner profits at a level to which they had become accustomed during the boom years of the war. However the radicals and working classes saw it as a piece of class legislation by saving upper class landowners from cheaper foreign grain, stabilising prices and making it more expensive for the consumer. The consequences were riots, petitions and demonstrations, thus worsening general discontent. Another piece of legislation that was viewed by the radicals as being blatant protection of the upper classes, was the Income Tax Repeal of 1816. This saw the income-based tax (the more you earn, the more you pay) being abolished by the aristocratically dominated government, who had born the brunt of the tax. In order to fill the gap in the revenue, indirect taxation was increased on popular items such as beer and sugar, a measure which hit the poor even harder than the Corn Law as they used these items on a regular basis. ...read more.


For example urbanisation and industrialisation were new social occurences in the name of progress. It would have been unprecedented for a government to behave any differently to the way in which lord Liverpool's administration did. The government passed legislation such as the Suspension of the Habeas Corpus in order to attempt to maintain law and order, which they, and any government of the time felt was their primary responsibility (above the solving causes of the unrest itself). This heavy-handed approach to dealing with the discontented situation would have been directly related to fear of a revolution similar to the French occuring in Britain and in protection of the upper classes who were the support and make-up of Lord Liverpool's administration, and thus to be expected. In addition, the extent of the government use of spies is questionable, because there was much differing of opinion in the interpretations of their use, with some believing that some spies took it upon themselves to incite radical behaviour, outside of their governmental orders (just to spy on radical operations). Another major issue, is that the government was not directly responsible for the unrepresentative electoral system which was the radical movement's major opposition to the administration, as it pre-dated them. The economic legislation that they passed, did not make them directly responsible because it was the post-war depression and good corn harvests that caused the economic problems, their laws aggravated the situation rather than caused it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The Word 'Hacker' To the popular press, "hacker" means someone who breaks into ...

    The reason Florence is famous is that in 1450, it was New York. In 1450 it was filled with the kind of turbulent and ambitious people you find now in America. (So I went back to America.) It is greatly to America's advantage that it is a congenial atmosphere for

  2. How successful was Lord Liverpool in responding to radical challenge from 1812-1822?

    Some historians say that Lord Liverpool did not address unrest, but he made it worse by introducing silly little policies like the Corn Laws. The Corn Law guaranteed protection for wheat prices for the agricultural or landowner interest from foreign imports of grain.

  1. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    The Anti-Corn Law League were united and were effectively run by Joseph Hicken and J.B. Smith. A council and number of committees ran it. The national organisation was divided into twelve districts, each run by a league agent. This structured organisation would maximise efficiency and run a professional campaign.

  2. This assignment identifies and discusses the major social and political trends expected to affect ...

    (J Cargill and K. Heese 2002) Steven Friedman (1998) maintains that economic policy has to be designed taking into account the socio-economic domestic environment and has to take cognisance of what will change people's behaviour in a manner that supports growth and development. In South Africa perceptions are strongly influenced by race and are often played

  1. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    Gandhi's role can be seen in two ways; on the one hand, ultimately it was he who called off the civil disobedience campaign in India and called for parity and calm because the campaign had deviated from what it was supposed to achieve.

  2. Why was there repression by Lord Liverpool's government 1815-1820? Was Britain on the verge ...

    The government introduced these laws as they feared cheaper foreign corn would be sold more than home grown, this would leave the farmers and landowners out of pocket. During the war farmers had enjoyed high prices and prosperity, landowners increased rent and loans had been contracted at high wartime interest rates.

  1. Why was there popular discontent between 1815-1822? How was it expressed and did the ...

    The Corn Laws, legislation protecting the market for British corn as opposed to foreign imports was seen by many as a piece of class legislation that penalised the poorer sections of society, while guaranteeing the wealthy landowners a goof price.

  2. How far were the Anti Corn Law League responsible for Peel's repeal of the ...

    1844, led by the Dukes of Buckingham and Richmond who had left the Whigs and joined the Conservatives because they suspected Whig policy on the Corn Laws: this was partly responsible for the 1841 Conservative victory. Agricultural M.P.s were afraid of upsetting their constituents.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work