• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far were the Anti Corn Law League responsible for Peel's repeal of the Corn Laws?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far was The Anti Corn Law League responsible for the repeal of the Corn Laws? The Anti Corn Law League's part in the resolve over the issue of repeal was due chiefly to their mighty effort in drawing mass attention to the subject, bringing it to the forefront of the political agenda. They had one aim - to see to the complete removal of the tariff on corn. Led by dynamic and intelligent politicians, the league organised themselves using new and innovative ways to spread their message. They capitalised on the contemporary social, economic and religious discontent of the lower and middle classes, of which the Corn Laws were felt as being imposed at their expense. Armed with the interest to relieve social distress and a potential 'class war' the league did all it could outside and inside Parliament to pressurise Peel. Peel's need for 'good government' swept the beliefs of the pressure group into the political tide; the famine in Ireland, Peel's own party politics and Britain's international stance were all factors included in the decision of repeal. It was by no means that Peel's ultimate decision was the fruit of the Anti Corn Law League's labour alone. The Anti-Corn Law League was founded by Richard Cobden and John Bright in 1839 Both of these men believed in the idea of Free Trade, where no import taxes should be levied whatsoever. ...read more.

Middle

This effective organisation made raising awareness possible, communicating their message in all social spectrums. Without adopting an antagonistic approach whereby violence and heavy disruption of Britain would have wreaked havoc, the League's method of educated debate served them as staunch opponents. As an opposition group, the League threatened Peel's political future. Peel's background was of the textile mills, therefore he would have been partial to free trade. However, as leader of the Conservatives, in theory, he was obliged to uphold Conservative values i.e. maintaining the Corn Laws. His personal belief was that Britain's stagnant economy was due to their protectionist stance. As a result he needed an excuse for repeal. If he had given in to the demands of a pressure group in the form of the ACLL, not only committing treason to his party, he would have appeared weak and ineffectual. From1840 to 1842, failed harvests meant that basic foodstuffs were in short supply and consequently more expensive. Protective tax on wheat made it more expensive, jeopardous to the poorer population. The potato crop in Ireland had failed in 1845 causing widespread famine. Europe itself was facing similar problems of poor harvests so already there was a general pressure on the government to reconsider its protectionist stance of the 1815 Corn Laws, which was obstructing the way for cheap bread. ...read more.

Conclusion

The repeal was marked by the sale of innumerable emblems, among them crude statuettes of the Prime Minister, Sir Robert Peel as well as commemorative china inscribed with words of thanksgiving." - Nicolas Bentley. The Anti Corn Law League did succeed in bringing the issue to the forefront of politics and subjecting Peel to extra parliamentary pressure despite his declared rejection of this idea. They had the means and organisation to start a revolution and it was the right condition in England to create the uprising. Peel knew along with the social climate changing beneath him, the only way to stablise Britain was to go with the general consensus even if it meant turning his back on his party, something he was now accustomed to. Looking out for the country's interests rather than agricultural elite's profits, the League placed the issue of repeal right in front of him and it was up to Peel to take the final step. The devastating famine in Ireland allowed Peel to save himself from party humiliation as he could demonstrated his 'humanitarian attitude' which would coincide with the need to repeal in England. The Anti Corn Law League, did as much as it could to push for repeal ad it showed the social discontent and I believe that they were half responsible for repeal of the Corn Laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    Furthermore, repealing the Corn Laws would also benefit Britain's export market, as other countries would in turn reduce tariffs on British imports. They said that this would lead to a reign of peace between nations, and bring Europe closer together.

  2. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    It was not until the 1930s that he returned to politics. The political situation in India during the mid-1920s saw little change effected in this period and Gandhi imprisoned for periods at a time.

  1. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    interests but that of their constituencies and thus bowing to public opinion, a result of reform? When looking at the national social and economic situations that could be argued led to the idea of repeal and thus party split, one must not ignore the Potato famine in Ireland and economic instability in certain parts of England and Scotland.

  2. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    protested that: "Even the good landlords are going to bad, and the bad are going to the worst extremities of cruelty and tyranny, while both are suffered by a truckling [submissive] and heartless government to make a wilderness of the country and a waste of human life" The attitude of

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    normal direct tax so weren't keen on the idea but he managed to win his party round by lower indirect taxes but this measure mainly help the working class because it meant a fair system of taxation. Peel also made other economic reforms in his ministry the first one of

  2. Constitutional and administrative law.

    Another problem arises when one considers how executive power has been reorganised and redistributed and the line between governmental and private bodies has become blurred. Under the Ministers of the Crown Act (1975) the functions of any government department can be transferred to any other.

  1. Conservative Victory of 1941, Peel and the Weakness of the Whigs.

    The Whigs 'reactionary' principles contributed to their downfall. The Whigs also lost support because of the simple idea that they could not be trusted. It began with the Tolpuddle Martyrs, who started a Trade Union. As a result of this, the Whigs transported them to Australia - this of course angered the working class who gave the Whigs no sympathy.

  2. Public Law 1 Assessed Essay 1

    This instance can be related to the case of Ellen St Estates Ltd v Minister of Health, Lord Justice Maugham, "The Legislature cannot, according to our constitution bind itself as to the form of subsequent legislation, and it is impossible for Parliament to enact that in a subsequent statute dealing with the same subject-matter there can be no implied repeal".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work