• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22

How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in Pakistan's political experience? To what extent have they succeeded in addressing elite and sectional interests, and social and regional tensions?

Extracts from this document...


How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in Pakistan's political experience? To what extent have they succeeded in addressing elite and sectional interests, and social and regional tensions? Discuss and give reasons for your arguments. INTRODUCTION: This year Pakistan will celebrate its 56th anniversary on 14th August, 2003. Among these 56 years, Pakistan has been ruled more by the military leaders than the civil leaders. India which also got its independence with us has not seen even a single military coup in its entire history. Due to this reason India is recognized in the entire world as the largest democratic country after United States of America. If we compare Indian with Pakistan, we would realize that India has a very strong parliament, free press and media, a very strong and independent judiciary, strong government departments. The democratic institutions have their roots in the grass root level of their population. These are the things which block the way of military intervention. On the other hand, in Pakistan, unfortunately, never in its entire history a serious attempt has been made to make the parliament stronger. The press and the media have always been under influence of the government. The politics revolve around in the hands of few strong landlord and industrial families along with the generals. It is due to these reasons that military got the opportunity to intervene in civil affairs and rule the country. The military has always considered itself as the better ruler than the civil politicians. In Pakistan, military is a sacred cow which is answerable to none Through this paper I would try to explain the role of military and civil rulers in addressing the elite and sectional interests as well as the social and regional tensions. This paper is basically an attempt to show that how the role played by rulers of Pakistan (both military and civil) ...read more.


Although the Chief of the Army Staff do not talk about the country's foreign policy publicly but General Baig discussed the government's policy over Gulf War publicly and openly criticized America and supported Saddam and gave his famous doctrine of 'Strategic Defence'27. It was also known that both the army and the PM differed in their approach to Kashmir, US and even Sindh. But the main factor which annoyed the army and led to Nawaz Sharif's dismissal was "Sharif's solo flight in initiating peace process with India."28. The National Assembly was dissolved by the President but for the first time in the history of Pakistan it was restored by the Supreme Court. This decision of the court resulted in a political deadlock between the Prime Minister and the President. The military came in and brokered a deal where both the President and the PM resigned and new elections were held in October 1993. 29 8. The second Benazir's Government: Benazir started her second term as the Prime Minister after winning the 1993 elections and getting the largest number of seats in the National Assembly. A PPP nominated Senator Farooq Ahmad Leghari became the President of Pakistan. This time Benazir's relations with the military were much improved. She tried her best to avoid any kind of interference in the internal hierarchy of military and kept the major security and foreign policy matters as the main preference of her government. According to Hassan Askari, "What got the Bhutto government into trouble in 1996 was its abysmal performance in the civilian sector and its failure again to provide an effective and transparent administration"29. The ethnic violence in Karachi and Hyderabad intensified during 1995-96 when the MQM and the law enforcing agencies (police and rangers) confronted each other. The result was increased violence and killings of innocent people. There were incidents of unidentified gunmen killing innocent people and looting of government as well as private property. ...read more.


For further details see "Pakistan-Taliban-Al Qaida: New Trends in Terrorism and Violence" in Strategic Analysis: A Monthly Journal of the IDSA December 2001 (Vol. XXV No. 9). 20. On December 22, 2000, the Lashkar attacked New Delhi's historic Red Fort. Two Indian soldiers and a civilian guard were killed. The Lashkar has pledged next to bomb the Indian prime minister's office. 21. See Ahmed Rashid, "Borrowed Time", Far Eastern Economic Review, December 14,2000, p.25. 22. See Ahmed Rashid, "Borrowed Time", Far Eastern Economic Review, December 14,2000, p.28. 23. See Shalini Chawla's "Recent Developments in Pakistan" in Strategic Analysis (A Monthly Journal of the IDSA) May 2001 (Vol. XXV No. 2) 24. For more details on the post zia period. See "Paksiatn: A Political History" by Ziring at p. 503. 25. See "The Nation" on 7th November 1990. 26. See Khaled Ahmed, "The folly of ruling through spies", The Friday Times, Nov 21-27, 1996, p.9 27. See Najam Sethi, "Unveiling Gen Beg's grand plan", The Friday Times, April 28-May 4, 1994, p.6 28. See Zafar Abas, "The call to Arms", The Herald, December 1997, p.41. 29. For details on dissolution and restoration of the Assembly and the role of the services chiefs as mediators, see national newspapers dated between April 19, 1993 and June 1993. For example, "National Assembly dissolved, Army takes over PTV, radio stations", cover story in Dawn, 19 April, 1993. 30. For more details on the Military Civil relations, See Hassan Askari, "Civil Military Relations in Contemporary Pakistan", "Survival"; London; Summer 1998. p. 96-113. 31. See "Asian Recorder", 2000, p.267-268 32. For more details on the agreement of Sharif's exile, see Shalini Chawla, "Recent Developments in Pakistan" in Strategic Analysis, May 2001 (Vol. XXV No. 2). 33. Dr. Jon P. Dorschner is a Professor at Department of Social Sciences, United States Military Academy. Information about the post 9/11 relations between Pakistan and United States can be seen in his article "A New Response to the Kashmir Dispute" 34. Zia talked about his idea of Islam in an interview on BBC on 15th April, 1978. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The media plays an important role in society. What is its role and to ...

    There are statements made by people that suggest we don't need media and that it's used for ludicrous things like the Media having no real impact on the lives of the people in the UK. This statement would be completely incorrect in my eyes; Media is a part of our

  2. To what extent is Parliament supreme?

    For example, the convention gives a right to a fair trial. A person who believed they had been denied that right in a criminal case because the procedural rules governing their case operated unfairly against them might sue under the Human Rights Act.

  1. What impact did Mao have on the lives of the Chinese people from 1949 ...

    Mao Zedong was opposed to these policies. He thought that they were too 'capitalist'. In 1962, the Socialist Education Movement was launched, aiming to get people back into Communism. The 'four clean-ups campaign' to get rid of corruption and bad Party leadership was also introduced, to discourage people who showed signs of 'capitalist' behaviour.

  2. Party system in India

    Although the Congress retained power at the Union level by a narrow margin of 54% of Lok Sabha seats in the 1967 elections, the party rule crumbled in 8 States. Rajni Kothari spoke of the dominant party model giving way to a more differentiated structure of party competition.

  1. What Are The Key Elements Of Thatcherism? To What Extent Was It A Reaction ...

    the 1970s it no longer seemed possible, and in 1975, a Labour government abandoned full employment as its aim. According to Keynes, they should have solved the economic crisis by increasing demand, but James Callaghan stated this was not to happen.

  2. To what extent was there a 'post war consensus' between 1945-1970.

    world position, but they both became aware of the necessity to become part of that union once the British Empire had started to collapse in the 1960s. The two political parties disagreed on many policies, sometimes it was just a matter of emphasis, but on others the differences were more significant.

  1. Introduction and Company Background.

    They are asset/cost efficiency, customer services, marketing advantage, profit stability/growth, goodwill of the company, expertise. * Savings Saving cost is a significant element that forces our company to use third party logistics services. The major activities provided by third party logistics provider are transportation, distribution, freight payment and auditing, cost

  2. The colonial factor in the Nigerian civil war (1967-1970)

    Nigeria was an amalgamation of three main ethnic groups; the Hausa/Fulani's in the north, the Yoruba's in the west and the Igbo's in the east. These three main groups had a pre-colonial history of tribal and religious conflicts. This was compounded by intra-regional rivalry between the major ethnic groups in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work