• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22

How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in Pakistan's political experience? To what extent have they succeeded in addressing elite and sectional interests, and social and regional tensions?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in Pakistan's political experience? To what extent have they succeeded in addressing elite and sectional interests, and social and regional tensions? Discuss and give reasons for your arguments. INTRODUCTION: This year Pakistan will celebrate its 56th anniversary on 14th August, 2003. Among these 56 years, Pakistan has been ruled more by the military leaders than the civil leaders. India which also got its independence with us has not seen even a single military coup in its entire history. Due to this reason India is recognized in the entire world as the largest democratic country after United States of America. If we compare Indian with Pakistan, we would realize that India has a very strong parliament, free press and media, a very strong and independent judiciary, strong government departments. The democratic institutions have their roots in the grass root level of their population. These are the things which block the way of military intervention. On the other hand, in Pakistan, unfortunately, never in its entire history a serious attempt has been made to make the parliament stronger. The press and the media have always been under influence of the government. The politics revolve around in the hands of few strong landlord and industrial families along with the generals. It is due to these reasons that military got the opportunity to intervene in civil affairs and rule the country. The military has always considered itself as the better ruler than the civil politicians. In Pakistan, military is a sacred cow which is answerable to none Through this paper I would try to explain the role of military and civil rulers in addressing the elite and sectional interests as well as the social and regional tensions. This paper is basically an attempt to show that how the role played by rulers of Pakistan (both military and civil) ...read more.

Middle

Although the Chief of the Army Staff do not talk about the country's foreign policy publicly but General Baig discussed the government's policy over Gulf War publicly and openly criticized America and supported Saddam and gave his famous doctrine of 'Strategic Defence'27. It was also known that both the army and the PM differed in their approach to Kashmir, US and even Sindh. But the main factor which annoyed the army and led to Nawaz Sharif's dismissal was "Sharif's solo flight in initiating peace process with India."28. The National Assembly was dissolved by the President but for the first time in the history of Pakistan it was restored by the Supreme Court. This decision of the court resulted in a political deadlock between the Prime Minister and the President. The military came in and brokered a deal where both the President and the PM resigned and new elections were held in October 1993. 29 8. The second Benazir's Government: Benazir started her second term as the Prime Minister after winning the 1993 elections and getting the largest number of seats in the National Assembly. A PPP nominated Senator Farooq Ahmad Leghari became the President of Pakistan. This time Benazir's relations with the military were much improved. She tried her best to avoid any kind of interference in the internal hierarchy of military and kept the major security and foreign policy matters as the main preference of her government. According to Hassan Askari, "What got the Bhutto government into trouble in 1996 was its abysmal performance in the civilian sector and its failure again to provide an effective and transparent administration"29. The ethnic violence in Karachi and Hyderabad intensified during 1995-96 when the MQM and the law enforcing agencies (police and rangers) confronted each other. The result was increased violence and killings of innocent people. There were incidents of unidentified gunmen killing innocent people and looting of government as well as private property. ...read more.

Conclusion

For further details see "Pakistan-Taliban-Al Qaida: New Trends in Terrorism and Violence" in Strategic Analysis: A Monthly Journal of the IDSA December 2001 (Vol. XXV No. 9). 20. On December 22, 2000, the Lashkar attacked New Delhi's historic Red Fort. Two Indian soldiers and a civilian guard were killed. The Lashkar has pledged next to bomb the Indian prime minister's office. 21. See Ahmed Rashid, "Borrowed Time", Far Eastern Economic Review, December 14,2000, p.25. 22. See Ahmed Rashid, "Borrowed Time", Far Eastern Economic Review, December 14,2000, p.28. 23. See Shalini Chawla's "Recent Developments in Pakistan" in Strategic Analysis (A Monthly Journal of the IDSA) May 2001 (Vol. XXV No. 2) 24. For more details on the post zia period. See "Paksiatn: A Political History" by Ziring at p. 503. 25. See "The Nation" on 7th November 1990. 26. See Khaled Ahmed, "The folly of ruling through spies", The Friday Times, Nov 21-27, 1996, p.9 27. See Najam Sethi, "Unveiling Gen Beg's grand plan", The Friday Times, April 28-May 4, 1994, p.6 28. See Zafar Abas, "The call to Arms", The Herald, December 1997, p.41. 29. For details on dissolution and restoration of the Assembly and the role of the services chiefs as mediators, see national newspapers dated between April 19, 1993 and June 1993. For example, "National Assembly dissolved, Army takes over PTV, radio stations", cover story in Dawn, 19 April, 1993. 30. For more details on the Military Civil relations, See Hassan Askari, "Civil Military Relations in Contemporary Pakistan", "Survival"; London; Summer 1998. p. 96-113. 31. See "Asian Recorder", 2000, p.267-268 32. For more details on the agreement of Sharif's exile, see Shalini Chawla, "Recent Developments in Pakistan" in Strategic Analysis, May 2001 (Vol. XXV No. 2). 33. Dr. Jon P. Dorschner is a Professor at Department of Social Sciences, United States Military Academy. Information about the post 9/11 relations between Pakistan and United States can be seen in his article "A New Response to the Kashmir Dispute" 34. Zia talked about his idea of Islam in an interview on BBC on 15th April, 1978. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Identify the problems that 2 African countries have faced since Independence. To what extent ...

    However, Obote only succeeded in making matters worse as neither his economic, nor his political decisions helped the country, but instead turned Uganda's downfall going at a constant rate. Finally the break out of the HIV/AIDS epidemic promised to completely destroy Uganda.

  2. The media plays an important role in society. What is its role and to ...

    There are statements made by people that suggest we don't need media and that it's used for ludicrous things like the Media having no real impact on the lives of the people in the UK. This statement would be completely incorrect in my eyes; Media is a part of our

  1. Is the Supreme Court a Political or Judical institution?

    The SC ensured that the Electoral College votes and the presidency would be given to George Bush. The Bush vs. Gore case cemented the fact that the Court has a major role in US politics and policy making. 5) In recent years the court has intervened in security issues, which has traditionally been seen as the preserve of the executive.

  2. How far has the release of Nelson Mandela in 1990 influenced South Africa's social, ...

    There was about 3 million uneducated young adults and the economy had slumped. There was also a high unemployment rate. The date was set for 27th April 1994 but the Zulus and conservative party left talks. They could not unite without the Zulu's support since they were such a big part of the population.

  1. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    However over the years of conflict it now seems that Savimbi would not have settled for anything apart from total control. Non-party defined incompatibilities between MPLA and UNITA focus on the issue that despite peace being desirable as an ideal, the practical short term affects of peace on the two parties are difficult to resolve.

  2. Why Did The Leveller Movement Fail To Achieve Its Political And Religious Objectives In ...

    Another key factor that led that prevented the Levellers from achieving their political and religious objectives was the fact that they had never won national support. Their main base was in London and the South East, among merchants and traders who would benefit from their reforms.

  1. 'Nationalist Groups in the Sub-Continent played the most significant role in Britain's decision to ...

    In 1906 the All-India Muslim League formed with favourable relations towards British rule, but by 1913 that changed when the League shifted its focus and began to view Indian self-government as its goal. There are three significant reasons why the Muslim nationalist movement emerged in 1906, later than the Hindu movement.

  2. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    and modernization of the Turkish Republic."1 Furthermore, to achieve "...republicanism, nationalism, secularism, statism, populism and revolutionism."2 It was during his rule in which he worked to implement reforms in the country's social, political and economic life so that current institutions and attitudes in Turkey would alter and democracy in Turkey would flourish under his successors.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work