How important was the opposition of other countries in bringing apartheid in South Africa to an end?

Authors Avatar

How important was the opposition of other countries in bringing apartheid in South Africa to an end?

This essay will explain the causes of Apartheid’s collapse and if the opposition of other countries to apartheid was the main cause of its end in 1994. Apartheid first took power in 1948 under Dr Malan. The Purified National party, of which Malan was the leader, won 39% of the vote and formed the new government. Apartheid lasted 48 years. The main message of Apartheid was segregation of races. Laws such as the prohibition of mixed racial marriages, and the group areas act kept different races apart. Every person was classified as a white, coloured or native. Apartheid made segregation very harmful to the black community.  Many internally and externally did not agree with apartheid and its laws.

Although international pressure and criticism was a cause for the collapse of Apartheid, the main cause was the internal resistance and opposition. The internal resistance had been in South Africa since Malan came to power. The reasons for why this is the main cause will be explained in the conclusion of this essay. I will be looking at the economic, international, political and social causes for the collapse and whether they were long, short or immediate causes.

An immediate cause of the collapse of Apartheid in 1994 was the replacement of P.W. Botha with F.W. De Klerk as President of South Africa. On his first big speech on 2nd February 1989 De Klerk shocked everyone by announcing drastic changes to the National Party. He legalised the ANC, the PAC the SACP and he released hundreds of political prisoners which included Nelson Mandela and Walter Sisulu. This was considered a miracle by many, as Apartheid laws were being loosened. In October 1989, ANC leaders were released from prison and in February 1990 so was Mandela. De Klerk effectively abolished Apartheid.

Soon after, Mandela was named the leader of the ANC. In 1991 and 1992 the Codesa talks occurred. The discussions went on for many months with all political parties having different ideas on how South Africa should be run. Internal violence became worse while the talks continued and right up until the first democratic vote in South African history on the 27th April 1994. Before the 1994 elections many white South Africans were against giving up the white majority rule. This was mainly because whites were scared blacks would take revenge on them for all the years of hardship they'd been through under apartheid. The whites feared that giving up the white majority rule would mean all their land and most of their white towns would be taken over by blacks who would move in for work. The whites feared their land would be redistributed, as it was almost certain that the ANC was going to win the 1994 elections, and one of their election promises was to redistribute the land to the blacks.

Join now!

 The ANC won 62.5% of the vote and Mandela became President. This was the end of Apartheid.

This is an important reason, because if De Klerk was not made President, Apartheid may not have collapsed. De Klerk’s vision was to move the National Party in a different direction and to loosen Apartheid laws. De Klerk’s new direction may have been linked to the loss of support of the National Party in the late 1980s. Botha and the Nationalists lost a lot of votes in the 1987 election. The Conservative Party became one of the main opposition and this caused ...

This is a preview of the whole essay