• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How much did Disraeli contribute to British Imperialism and do you think Gladstone was right to hate him for his Imperial Politics?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How much did Disraeli contribute to British Imperialism and do you think Gladstone was right to hate him for his Imperial Politics? Disraeli is often associated as one of the key drivers of British Imperialism at a time of great expansion, including the Scramble for Africa in the late 19th Century. His speech in 1872 (on the 3rd April in Manchester and on 24th June at Crystal Palace) asserted a need for an active foreign policy, the importance of colonies, and for Britain to continue to play a key role on the world stage. But much of the speech, as with so much of Disraeli's work, lacked both detail and substance, with much devoted to a critique of Gladstone's polices rather than shaping a vision for the future. In 1852 Disraeli had written to his colleague Malmesbury that 'These wretched colonies will all be independent too, in a few years and are a millstone round our necks' which gives some insight as to his early personal views on Imperialism. ...read more.

Middle

For Disraeli, the Empire was a means of spreading the peculiar glories of aristocratic rule and the English constitution, with the Empire as a benevolent despot. But more importantly, Disraeli also used this as a means of attracting working-class voters at home. He knew that the Empire could distract people from domestic issues and that pride in the Empire could act as powerful force for the good, in terms of his own political gain. Gladstone, on the other hand, was a political idealist with strong convictions and a deep rooted respect for religion. Gladstone saw an opportunity to exploit what he saw as a reckless, foreign policy, intent on domination regardless of the cost and irrespective of civil liberties. This, in part, will have contributed to the Liberal victory of 1880. The pre-election campaign focussed on Disraeli's war-mongering expansion of empire, taking issue with what Gladstone saw as the principles of foreign policy: the preservation of peace and justice (with economy), the avoidance of needless engagements, the ...read more.

Conclusion

And it was this that Gladstone loathed the most. The categorisation of opportunist and idealist could be applied to Disraeli and Gladstone respectively. Disraeli as the arch imperialist, who presided over a period of rapid expansion and bloody conflict, but without ever articulating a vision for the future, found himself in a position where the ground work for imperial expansion had already been laid. In this, Disraeli contributed little other than to exploit these circumstances for his own political gain. Gladstone, on the other hand, talked about the fraternity of nation states, the preservation of equal justice and human rights, at a time of great competition and instability. Imperialism was a popular cause and security of our interests abroad, in particular India, could not ignored. And whilst Gladstone's effort to discredit Disraeli was to be expected, it might be unrealistic to expect that Britain could have pursued a significantly different policy during the period 1874- 1880. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Decolonisation in India.

    Informing the basic recipe was the key identification that nationalism, as the central dynamic in the Indian problem, had to be satisfied though not surrendered to in any constitutional settlement. To militate against the spectre of a nationalist despotism -an abiding socialist fear-there was the safeguard that enfranchisement would go

  2. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    turned the non-Bengali population of the state into ethnic minorities, for Bengali was after all a cultural category rooted in the Bengali language and culture. (Mohsin, 2001:17) The Bangladesh state also does not officially recognize the existence of any ethnic communities.

  1. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    arose, gaining a significant foothold in 1975, when Angola became independent, enabling more secure military bases to be established across the border. Over the 1970s, all the popular churches moved towards speaking out against apartheid, culminating in the establishment of the Council of Churches in Namibia (CCN)

  2. Apartheid in South Africa.

    Source J is from the government who had banned all anti-apartheid parties, and they hated the concept of any disagreement in the white supremacy rule and lifestyle. This is why they all back up and mirror each other: they all believe that they will be believed if they all stick

  1. What is Politics UK politics revision notes

    - France * Multi-Party (Unstable) - Italy Main Functions of a Party- * Recruitment * Participation * Coalitions of interests * Communication * Speeches * Meetings * Conferences * Publications * Web-Sites * Accountability and control * Accountable at elections * Identify who is in-charge Types of Parties- * Cadre - Loose group of MP's and local notables, i.e.

  2. A Detail on the British Empire Between the Great Wars, from 1918 to 1939.

    Labor Unions took great measures to protect their members through measures such as strikes: between 1919 and 1920 there were close to 2000 different strikes all around the country. By 1921, it is estimated that as much as one fourth of the British workforce was unemployed, putting gargantuan stress on the social welfare system.

  1. Contribution of both Gladstone and Disraeli to British Politics between 1846 and 1865

    speech almost single-handedly led to the Tory government's collapse, and because of this Disraeli took a severe dislike to Gladstone. This speech was a significant contribution not only due to its immediate effect but the creation of a bitter rivalry between Disraeli and Gladstone, which altered British politics for decades.

  2. How and why did Federation occur?

    How was paternalism applied to Aboriginal peoples? * This is the belief that Aboriginals should be treated like small children and needed protection. Special reserves were created for Aborigines on Crown land. These protectorates were set up to 'look after' Aborigines.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work