• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How much did Disraeli contribute to British Imperialism and do you think Gladstone was right to hate him for his Imperial Politics?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How much did Disraeli contribute to British Imperialism and do you think Gladstone was right to hate him for his Imperial Politics? Disraeli is often associated as one of the key drivers of British Imperialism at a time of great expansion, including the Scramble for Africa in the late 19th Century. His speech in 1872 (on the 3rd April in Manchester and on 24th June at Crystal Palace) asserted a need for an active foreign policy, the importance of colonies, and for Britain to continue to play a key role on the world stage. But much of the speech, as with so much of Disraeli's work, lacked both detail and substance, with much devoted to a critique of Gladstone's polices rather than shaping a vision for the future. In 1852 Disraeli had written to his colleague Malmesbury that 'These wretched colonies will all be independent too, in a few years and are a millstone round our necks' which gives some insight as to his early personal views on Imperialism. ...read more.

Middle

For Disraeli, the Empire was a means of spreading the peculiar glories of aristocratic rule and the English constitution, with the Empire as a benevolent despot. But more importantly, Disraeli also used this as a means of attracting working-class voters at home. He knew that the Empire could distract people from domestic issues and that pride in the Empire could act as powerful force for the good, in terms of his own political gain. Gladstone, on the other hand, was a political idealist with strong convictions and a deep rooted respect for religion. Gladstone saw an opportunity to exploit what he saw as a reckless, foreign policy, intent on domination regardless of the cost and irrespective of civil liberties. This, in part, will have contributed to the Liberal victory of 1880. The pre-election campaign focussed on Disraeli's war-mongering expansion of empire, taking issue with what Gladstone saw as the principles of foreign policy: the preservation of peace and justice (with economy), the avoidance of needless engagements, the ...read more.

Conclusion

And it was this that Gladstone loathed the most. The categorisation of opportunist and idealist could be applied to Disraeli and Gladstone respectively. Disraeli as the arch imperialist, who presided over a period of rapid expansion and bloody conflict, but without ever articulating a vision for the future, found himself in a position where the ground work for imperial expansion had already been laid. In this, Disraeli contributed little other than to exploit these circumstances for his own political gain. Gladstone, on the other hand, talked about the fraternity of nation states, the preservation of equal justice and human rights, at a time of great competition and instability. Imperialism was a popular cause and security of our interests abroad, in particular India, could not ignored. And whilst Gladstone's effort to discredit Disraeli was to be expected, it might be unrealistic to expect that Britain could have pursued a significantly different policy during the period 1874- 1880. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How and why did Federation occur?

    Universal suffrage for men was also marginally ahead. Australian men could vote in national elections from 1901 compared with USA (1913) and Great Britain (1918). How and why did Australia's patterns of migration change? What contribution did migrants make to Australia's social, cultural and economic development? * Since W.W.11 50% of Australia's population increase has been due to migration.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    British ships' entering the harbour not only brought with them a reliable supply of food and ammunition, but also troops that generated Malta's harbour activity and also some repairs in the dockyard. The troops and also the ship's crew wanted to but their daily necessities that increased drastically the income of the industries.

  1. Japanese Imperialism.

    This unquestionable obedience worked in favor of the Tokugawa rulers at first, however the Tokugawa Shogunate was built for war and groups, particularly the Samurai class, were most affected by this prolonged period of peace. In 1853, uninvited and ultimately unwelcome foreigners, who sought diplomatic and trade relations with Japan,

  2. A Detail on the British Empire Between the Great Wars, from 1918 to 1939.

    In fact, from 1920 up until the Second World War, many people only had a few months' work in 19 years. The main difficulties were felt in Britain's old industries, such as steel, textiles, shipbuilding, farming, and especially coal. Many of Britain's industrial factories and machines were getting old, and

  1. The Rise and fall of the Ottoman Empire.

    The population doubled, which produced both unemployment and famine, for the economic resources of the country could not support such a large population. The wealth of the Empire had always been largely due to their trade routes. The Empire stood on the crossroads of India, Asia, Africa and Europe.

  2. What is Politics

    It is important to note that power is a relationship. A person sitting alone on a desert island has no power because there is no-one over whom to wield that power- there is no 'B'. Types of power. Robert Dahl's definition of power is extremely broad.

  1. Ben Hanson - Politics - Mr

    Therefore, the only information that is released is information that the government wants to release, which of course is as little as possible. The Act puts MPs in a difficult situation because while they are restricted from asking informed questions, ministers have all the facilities of Whitehall to provide an answer.

  2. What is Politics UK politics revision notes

    * 1997 U.K. election, if a list system would have been used would have seen Labour 89 seats short of a majority Single Transferable Vote (STV)- * Used in Ireland * More than one member constituencies * Electors rank candidates in order of preference.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work