• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How much did Disraeli contribute to British Imperialism and do you think Gladstone was right to hate him for his Imperial Politics?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How much did Disraeli contribute to British Imperialism and do you think Gladstone was right to hate him for his Imperial Politics? Disraeli is often associated as one of the key drivers of British Imperialism at a time of great expansion, including the Scramble for Africa in the late 19th Century. His speech in 1872 (on the 3rd April in Manchester and on 24th June at Crystal Palace) asserted a need for an active foreign policy, the importance of colonies, and for Britain to continue to play a key role on the world stage. But much of the speech, as with so much of Disraeli's work, lacked both detail and substance, with much devoted to a critique of Gladstone's polices rather than shaping a vision for the future. In 1852 Disraeli had written to his colleague Malmesbury that 'These wretched colonies will all be independent too, in a few years and are a millstone round our necks' which gives some insight as to his early personal views on Imperialism. ...read more.

Middle

For Disraeli, the Empire was a means of spreading the peculiar glories of aristocratic rule and the English constitution, with the Empire as a benevolent despot. But more importantly, Disraeli also used this as a means of attracting working-class voters at home. He knew that the Empire could distract people from domestic issues and that pride in the Empire could act as powerful force for the good, in terms of his own political gain. Gladstone, on the other hand, was a political idealist with strong convictions and a deep rooted respect for religion. Gladstone saw an opportunity to exploit what he saw as a reckless, foreign policy, intent on domination regardless of the cost and irrespective of civil liberties. This, in part, will have contributed to the Liberal victory of 1880. The pre-election campaign focussed on Disraeli's war-mongering expansion of empire, taking issue with what Gladstone saw as the principles of foreign policy: the preservation of peace and justice (with economy), the avoidance of needless engagements, the ...read more.

Conclusion

And it was this that Gladstone loathed the most. The categorisation of opportunist and idealist could be applied to Disraeli and Gladstone respectively. Disraeli as the arch imperialist, who presided over a period of rapid expansion and bloody conflict, but without ever articulating a vision for the future, found himself in a position where the ground work for imperial expansion had already been laid. In this, Disraeli contributed little other than to exploit these circumstances for his own political gain. Gladstone, on the other hand, talked about the fraternity of nation states, the preservation of equal justice and human rights, at a time of great competition and instability. Imperialism was a popular cause and security of our interests abroad, in particular India, could not ignored. And whilst Gladstone's effort to discredit Disraeli was to be expected, it might be unrealistic to expect that Britain could have pursued a significantly different policy during the period 1874- 1880. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. This dispute dates back to the partition of the British Indian Empire, in August ...

    The Indians also rejected our efforts to defuse the situation, including the proposal for immediate cessation of hostilities, mutual respect for the LoC and resumption of the dialogue process in accordance with the Lahore Declaration. At the invitation of President Clinton, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif visited the US on

  2. Apartheid in South Africa.

    They only have second-hand knowledge of the happenings and are trying to mask the reality so they do not have to take the blame. Also, it is highly unlikely that a policeman who opened fire on innocent protesters is going to voluntarily take the blame for taking part in one of history's worst massacres.

  1. What is Politics UK politics revision notes

    rather than suggesting new policies * Howard- Has managed to distance himself away from Thatcher, but the problems of identity remain. Problems of Blair- * He has essentially stolen the Conservatives privatisation aims and tougher crime policies So what do the Conservatives stand for? WELL THE ELECTORATE DOESN'T REALLY KNOW.

  2. A Detail on the British Empire Between the Great Wars, from 1918 to 1939.

    However, soon the economy started to go into a decline again, a decline that would not stop until the rearmament before World War II. The huge numbers of soldiers returning from the War caused a great level of unemployment among the populace, increasing social and civil unrest, driving down wages, and pushing up prices.

  1. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    Although a cumulating amount of church letters in a certain period may represent a polarisation of opinion within a/many church/es, just one letter or event from one of the churches can send serious shock waves through a society. This has happened periodically in the cases of South Africa and Namibia, as I will illustrate further down.

  2. What is Politics

    morally wrong and that differences in resources should be evened out or even abolished. In the Soviet Union everybody, at least in theory, had equal resources, equal wealth. Conflicting values. When people defend their interests, it does not necessarily mean that they are being selfish.

  1. Ben Hanson - Politics - Mr

    purpose of discussing a specific and important matter that should have urgent consideration," via the speaker. If permission is granted the matter is debated for three hours (usually the next day) in what is known as an 'emergency debate.' However, typically permission is granted for less than 5% of applications (this also includes multiple applications of the same matter.)

  2. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    During the 1971 Liberation War of Bangladesh the military crackdown and genocide committed by the Pakistani Army was often justified by calling the Bengali Muslims as kaffirs or non-believers or Hindus. Needless to mention non-Muslims in East Bengal got specially targeted.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work