• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How much did Disraeli contribute to British Imperialism and do you think Gladstone was right to hate him for his Imperial Politics?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How much did Disraeli contribute to British Imperialism and do you think Gladstone was right to hate him for his Imperial Politics? Disraeli is often associated as one of the key drivers of British Imperialism at a time of great expansion, including the Scramble for Africa in the late 19th Century. His speech in 1872 (on the 3rd April in Manchester and on 24th June at Crystal Palace) asserted a need for an active foreign policy, the importance of colonies, and for Britain to continue to play a key role on the world stage. But much of the speech, as with so much of Disraeli's work, lacked both detail and substance, with much devoted to a critique of Gladstone's polices rather than shaping a vision for the future. In 1852 Disraeli had written to his colleague Malmesbury that 'These wretched colonies will all be independent too, in a few years and are a millstone round our necks' which gives some insight as to his early personal views on Imperialism. ...read more.

Middle

For Disraeli, the Empire was a means of spreading the peculiar glories of aristocratic rule and the English constitution, with the Empire as a benevolent despot. But more importantly, Disraeli also used this as a means of attracting working-class voters at home. He knew that the Empire could distract people from domestic issues and that pride in the Empire could act as powerful force for the good, in terms of his own political gain. Gladstone, on the other hand, was a political idealist with strong convictions and a deep rooted respect for religion. Gladstone saw an opportunity to exploit what he saw as a reckless, foreign policy, intent on domination regardless of the cost and irrespective of civil liberties. This, in part, will have contributed to the Liberal victory of 1880. The pre-election campaign focussed on Disraeli's war-mongering expansion of empire, taking issue with what Gladstone saw as the principles of foreign policy: the preservation of peace and justice (with economy), the avoidance of needless engagements, the ...read more.

Conclusion

And it was this that Gladstone loathed the most. The categorisation of opportunist and idealist could be applied to Disraeli and Gladstone respectively. Disraeli as the arch imperialist, who presided over a period of rapid expansion and bloody conflict, but without ever articulating a vision for the future, found himself in a position where the ground work for imperial expansion had already been laid. In this, Disraeli contributed little other than to exploit these circumstances for his own political gain. Gladstone, on the other hand, talked about the fraternity of nation states, the preservation of equal justice and human rights, at a time of great competition and instability. Imperialism was a popular cause and security of our interests abroad, in particular India, could not ignored. And whilst Gladstone's effort to discredit Disraeli was to be expected, it might be unrealistic to expect that Britain could have pursued a significantly different policy during the period 1874- 1880. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Decolonisation in India.

    Informing the basic recipe was the key identification that nationalism, as the central dynamic in the Indian problem, had to be satisfied though not surrendered to in any constitutional settlement. To militate against the spectre of a nationalist despotism -an abiding socialist fear-there was the safeguard that enfranchisement would go

  2. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    In 1992 it refused to celebrate the UN Year for Indigenous people on the grounds that Bangladesh the constitution gives no space or recognition to the ethnic and cultural distinctiveness or special rights of the ethno-nationalist communities. The only provision that the policymakers often refer to in this context is

  1. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    The regime had the advantage of being theologically justified by the Dutch Reformed Church, which was until recently the biggest Church in South Africa and still remains the second largest today (see Table 1). The state theology espoused by the DRC effectively 'blessed injustice, canonised the will of the powerful

  2. Apartheid in South Africa.

    (This is with reference to Colonel Pienaar, who used the excuse that the native mentality of black South Africans prevented them from protesting without misconduct or violence, which is hardly a justifiable or legitimate reason.) As prime minister Dr. Verwoerd had to, in respect, justify the police's actions and motives

  1. How much power and influence does the civil service have?

    The Civil Service had always been there to endorse it. In 1971 the Conservative government under Edward Heath, reversed its policies towards the state. He had plans to scale down the role of the state, especially in the economic and industrial spheres.

  2. What is Politics UK politics revision notes

    West Windsor Residence Association * Mass - Extensive active members across the country * Ideological - Labour and Clause 4, have to follow socialist beliefs * Pragmatic - Tony Ditching Clause 4 and the Conservative parties Philosophy Difference Between a Political Party and a Pressure Group- * Parties- Seek power

  1. A Detail on the British Empire Between the Great Wars, from 1918 to 1939.

    However, soon the economy started to go into a decline again, a decline that would not stop until the rearmament before World War II. The huge numbers of soldiers returning from the War caused a great level of unemployment among the populace, increasing social and civil unrest, driving down wages, and pushing up prices.

  2. Contribution of both Gladstone and Disraeli to British Politics between 1846 and 1865

    speech almost single-handedly led to the Tory government's collapse, and because of this Disraeli took a severe dislike to Gladstone. This speech was a significant contribution not only due to its immediate effect but the creation of a bitter rivalry between Disraeli and Gladstone, which altered British politics for decades.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work