• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Profound Were The Changes Introduced by the Labour Governments?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Profound Were The Changes Introduced by the Labour Governments? Some of the changes that the labour government introduced between 1945-51 were very profound. For instance the changes that were made by the government to tackle the five giant evils of society. The Government wanted to tackle Squalor, want, illness, disease and idleness. The introduction of the NHS was hugely profound. In 1945-6 Aneurin Bevan accepted the fundamental principle of a free and universal medical service, directly financed by the state. This change made by the labour government was revolutionary because it provided medical help to all people that was not possible before. It enabled the poor to be able to be treated for a disease that was not possible before because they could not afford be privately treated. There were other changes that the government had made that were seen as very profound. After the war the British public had lost no fewer then 700,000 homes and much of the existing stock was damaged as well. ...read more.

Middle

However the national insurance act of 1946 was a hugely profound change made by the labour government. The 1946 act meant that for those enrolled in the scheme, one weekly insurance payment over a working life provided cover against sickness, unemployment, and old age. The new rates of standard benefits were �1.60 for a single person and �2.40 for a married couple, the act limited unemployment benefits to thirty weeks. The act also immediately paid the old age pensioners the new rates, this was a profound change made by labour because this was more than double what the current pension was. Two further acts followed in 1948 by labour. Firstly the national assistance act provided a safety net for those who were not covered by the existing legislation, or whose benefits were inadequate. Secondly the industrial injuries act now made the state responsible for providing benefits arising from industrial injuries. ...read more.

Conclusion

However the nationalisation of other industries such as coal was a positive change made by labour. This was because the takeover of coal meant that the employees would receive more money from the government then they would do with it being private with the employer being able to decide how much it pays them. In conclusion I believe that the changes made by the labour government where very profound. The introduction of the NHS was such a profound change because it tackled the problem of disease well because enabled all classes to receive medical treatment. However I feel that the changes the labour governments made towards education were not profound in anyway. This is because the only real significant change made by labour was the age of leaving school was raised to 15. Although the introduction of national insurance was a huge change made by labour because it provided a safety net for the working class. It's the work done by labour on Health and National insurance that shows that the changes they made were profound and benefited the British people. George Pretty 04/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How significant is the influence which pressure groups have on government? Is there any ...

    However, access to the UK government is less successful by small groups due to its Cabinet-style government and strict party discipline. It is therefore the case that it is the bigger players with larger financial resources who can afford to employ professional lobbyists who gain most frequent access to MPs.

  2. personal exercis programme

    Before doing the multistage fitness test, I measured my resting heart rate (RHR). I measure it by counting my pulse for fifteen seconds, then multiplying the result by four. My resting heart rate was 64 beats per minute (bpm). I did the multistage fitness test and reached level ten.

  1. A Critical Evaluation of UK's ID Card schemeA Government's proposal to monitor its Citizens

    POLITICAL CONFLICT In the run up to the recently fought election the issue of the ID card was not directly at the top of any of the main contending party's manifestos, though it was indirectly included by its association with such potential vote winning issues as National security (Terrorist threats), illegal Immigration and organised crime.

  2. How and why did Federation occur?

    Universal suffrage for men was also marginally ahead. Australian men could vote in national elections from 1901 compared with USA (1913) and Great Britain (1918). How and why did Australia's patterns of migration change? What contribution did migrants make to Australia's social, cultural and economic development? * Since W.W.11 50% of Australia's population increase has been due to migration.

  1. Agenda for change

    So all the changes that take place in the NHS are usually first trailed in the NHS. This means there is no room for error. It is common sense that when any change takes place it involves risk taking.

  2. Chinese government's attitude to private enterprise

    -<Tab/>The failure of traditional communist economic planning (the communist way was flawed). -<Tab/>The experiences of ex-communist countries of the last ten years (Russia is no longer a communist country putting pressure on the remainders to follow suit). -<Tab/>The success of capitalist economies in Europe, USA and Japan (all these countries

  1. How successful was the 1945-51 labour government.

    Nationalisation improved conditions for workers and showed how the future would be under Labour. Coal was detrimental to Britain's economy, and the speed in which Labour brought it under public ownership shows Labours commitment. It also reduced unemployment and so decreased the amount of benefits needed.

  2. How successful were the Labour governments of 1924 and of 1929-31?

    a plan for the long-term success, and this did quite a lot to end the problem of inadequate housing supply. Indeed by 1933, when the scheme was stopped, 500,000 houses had been built. Labour also increased unemployment benefits. Labour did spent �28m on public work schemes to increase employment -

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work