• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Peel's government of 1841 to 1846?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Peel's government of 1841 to 1846? Peel entered government for the second time in his career in August 1841 with a strong Tory majority in Parliament gained in part by Peel's skill as leader of the Opposition and by the failings of Lord Melbourne's former Whig government. He would lead his new "Conservative" party through many difficulties and end his career with the repeal of the notorious Corn Laws in June 1846. His party was split between the loyal Peelite Conservatives and the older, more reactionary Tories, who still for the most part believed in agricultural protectionism once ensured by the scrapped Corn Laws. ...read more.

Middle

This put Peel in a compromising situation over his allegiance. The majority of his more practical policies followed the line of stimulating trade to create prosperity across Britain's social spectrum. This meant reducing or abolishing trade tariffs and reducing the legislative protection of many of Britain's domestic markets, namely agriculture. Traditionally, Tory leaders recognised their allegiance to their rich, landed, protestant electorate, and so obediently promoted the protection of their interests. But Peel made his decisions on what he honestly believed was for the good of the country as a whole, not on what best suited a small, elite sector of high society who expected to profit from the suffering of the oppressed working classes, starved to the brink of famine so those privileged few could live in decadent luxury. ...read more.

Conclusion

and influence over the good of the country, which couldn't be more opposed to Peel's belief in the good of the nation over the good of the party and her interests. A strange irrationality resided in the Tory mentality that resulted in knee-jerk opposition to the most harmless and necessary social and economical reform. On income tax they automatically opposed him at first, even though a �7 million budget deficit was sitting right under their noses, to which direct taxation was the only answer. For most of the party, the needs of the millions of disenfranchised workers in Britain didn't even enter into the equation, who they would much rather tax indirectly so as to minimise the financial impact on the upper classes. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How successful was the government of King Philip II of Spain?

    The length of the Perez affair showed the inefficiency of Philip's administration, as it was over a year before he was silenced, and the strength of the popular demonstrations organised by the nobles grew. Finally, Philip sent an army and within two weeks the revolt had been suppressed.

  2. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    Ashley said "He was the most dishonest of all public officers." So when the bill finally became legislation in June 1844, with a twelve hour clause women and young adult plus half days for children, it had total undermined Peel leadership and with fresh opposition Ashley saw his relations within his own party even more diminished.

  1. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    However Peel had seemingly made his mind up and one possible reason for this could have been the popular pressure of public opinion (such as the anti corn law league), this is a likely explanation, this liberal interpretation is highlighted by Hilton who describes it as seeing Peel 'as a slave not to intellectual fashion but public opinion.'

  2. Peel and the Tory party: 1829 - 1841.

    of trying to score petty victories against the Whigs in the Commons. As it was, the party still lacked cohesion, with the Ultra-Tories criticising Peel for his acceptance of the reform bill, and only around 150 Tory MPs were in parliament.

  1. Civil Service Reform.

    Traditional mechanisms by which government is called to account - such as the responsibility of ministers to parliament, House of Commons select committees and citizen representation to MPs - are straining under the new arrangements. At the centre of the debate is the Conservative government's claim to have separated policy

  2. How Far Did Peel Put Country Before Party?

    Something had to be done so peel set up income tax. Income tax taxed people in relation to their income. So the rich landed class were taxed more than the poor people who could not afford the high taxes. The scheme was so successful that it solved the problem of

  1. Conservative Victory of 1941, Peel and the Weakness of the Whigs.

    The Whigs 'reactionary' principles contributed to their downfall. The Whigs also lost support because of the simple idea that they could not be trusted. It began with the Tolpuddle Martyrs, who started a Trade Union. As a result of this, the Whigs transported them to Australia - this of course angered the working class who gave the Whigs no sympathy.

  2. How successful was Peel's ministry of 1841-1846.

    Finally, the 1845 Academic Colleges Act. This was the concession to the Catholic laity to match Maynooth, and split them from the repel movement. Three university colleges were to be set with the building grants and annual subsidy. Colleges were to be open to all denominations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work