• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was the government of King Philip II of Spain?

Extracts from this document...


How successful was the government of King Philip II of Spain? In order for Philip and his government to be defined as successful they would need to conform to the following characteristics: Philip would need to be a strong figurehead, efficiently overseeing all aspects of administration, but having the ability to delegate; communications should be proficient between separate areas of Philip's supervision, and implementation of policy should be smooth and uniform. There should be peace and unity within the regions of the country and a constant maintenance of law and order. There should be no cliques or factionalism within the court nor should there be any preference or bias in terms of personal regional favouritism. Finally there should be a sense of the government as an institution able to withstand change and the reigns of individual monarchs. Philip lived in an age when the idea of "personal monarchy" and the pretence of power, were extremely significant. Therefore Philip's personal role was crucial in the shaping and control of the government. Philip lived in the shadow of his father and took the advice given to him to "depend on no one but yourself" very literally. All work was done on paper, on the basis of consultas (memoranda, reports, and advice presented to him by his ministers). ...read more.


Towards the end of his reign he began to rely on juntas (specialised committees filled with his most skilled advisors), such as the Junta Grande but Philip's constant lack of trust meant that meant that he refused to succumb to the advise of just one junta and therefore once again succumbed to competing suggestions. Therefore despite the outward appearance of centralisation, the councils were actually an ad hoc system centred around the king, who again refused to delegate or devalue his power. Another aspect affecting Philip's government was his reliance on Spanish ministers and officials, and bias towards other more distant subjects of his empire. These subjects did not contest Philip's right to the throne, but the antipathy towards the Castilian stronghold of his empire meant that there was a definite lack of unity within his kingdom. Philip's predisposition to appoint Spaniards to official posts in the Netherlands, alienated local elites causing further tension and restricting efficient governing. Though Philip was well travelled and had a strong knowledge of the countries in his realm he did have a strong preference for Spaniards and could be narrow-minded when it came to receiving advice from officers of other nationalities, particularly as he grew older. This limited the range and quality of advice he was offered. On one hand the king recognised that a centralised base was needed away from the medieval-style travelling court government. ...read more.


Philip could not assert his authority without using force in those regions which challenged his rule. The revolt proved how jealously fueros were guarded and that these provinces resented a king who had ceased "to be their own". In conclusion, the government of Spain suffered as there was far too much power concentrated in Philip's hands. Unlike England, Spain was subject to separate assemblies: the Cortes in Castile along with the assembly in Navarre and three for each of the three regions of Aragon. The lack of a viable assembly lead to a great deal of power being concentrated in Philip's hands. Authority was administered by local agents appointed by the crown and viceroys carried out instructions of the crown. Philip, a compulsive micromanager, presided over specialized councils for state affairs, finance, war, and the Inquisition. A distrustful sovereign, Philip played royal bureaucrats against each other, leading to a system of imbalance, often damaging state business and the implementation of policy. A large part of this can be attributed to Philip's personal character traits as the pope Pius V said, "Your majesty spends so long considering your undertakings that when the moment to perform then comes the occasion has passed and the money has been spent.". However Spain was still a very medieval society, and the disunity of the country as a whole, due to the independence of the separate kingdoms, no doubt contributed to the deterioration and inefficiency of Philip's government. ?? ?? ?? ?? Katie Taylor 13S September 28th, 05 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Was the Provisional Government fatally weakened from the first? Notes

    halt the offensive and direct its energies to crushing subversives at home. The government took up this appeal for a tougher policy. Lvov stood down as prime minister, to be replaced by Kerensky. Kornilov became commander-in-chief. The government's troubles were deepened by events on the island of Kronstadt , the

  2. Gun control

    Soon after the massacre, the two students committed suicide. These youths set a significant example of youth in gun violence. Teenagers are prone to commit acts as these due to the violent environment they are exposed too. High school can be a place where teenagers can be emotionally involved and attacked.

  1. Why was there popular discontent between 1815-1822? How was it expressed and did the ...

    As well as the economic hardship faced by so many people, another reason why people felt dissatisfied by the government was their perception that it was unsympathetic to their plight.

  2. Why did a Civil War break out in Spain in 1936?

    What these two had in common were the desire for profound reforms and the diminishment of the power of the church and the army. The anarchistic movement CNT also aimed to destroy the state by revolutionary means, and hence fulfilled the desire of many exploited peasants.

  1. Decentralization and development of modern local government systems in Eastern Europe

    The grouping of countries selected here for investigation seemed to be practical due to the similar level of economic transition they have reached, though direct conclusions on the quality of public administration and local democracy thus far cannot be drawn based on this characteristic alone.

  2. How successful was Peel's Ministry 1841-1846?

    The 'Irish Colleges Bill' in 1844 which Peel hoped would bridge gaps between the Protestants and Catholics in Ireland ironically did the opposite. However, Peel's policies to Ireland were hindered by Protestant Peers, and the self-interested landowners constantly slowing and refusing most of it, in the case of the 'Maynooth

  1. How successful were Ferdinand and Isabella in laying the foundations of Spain's Golden Age?

    Henry Kamen comments on how their travels participated directly in the government of their subjects. Ferdinand's control of the military orders in Castile was a success as it helped increase its Crown considerably from the nobles who accepted the rule of the two monarchs.

  2. Explain and evaluate Locke's theory of government

    In Locke's theory of government, the state represents the set of people who incorporated in a single whole under aegis by them established general law and have created judicial instance, established the general law, competent to settle conflicts between them and to punish criminals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work