• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were Ferdinand and Isabella in laying the foundations of Spain's Golden Age?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful were Ferdinand and Isabella in laying the foundations of Spain's Golden Age? The term 'Golden Age' can not be taken for granted when discussing Spain in the reign of Ferdinand of Aragon and Isabella of Castile. The traditional view depicts the term as a major exploration of success sustained by the monarchs and that their reign was full of wealth, power and glory among other great things. However, this doesn't mean that Spain was a perfect country. Spain didn't even exist as it was spread into kingdoms of Castile and Aragon along with others. 1479 was the year when Isabella came to the throne of Castile and she was already married to Ferdinand, but both maintained independent kingdoms. Although Ferdinand supported her during the War of Succession, with Henry VI's daughter Joanna claiming the throne of Castile, it was no intention to unify the kingdoms as it was important for both members of the Trastamara family to establish their own form of government, language, laws and customs. Nonetheless, both monarchs had to work together from the start of their reigns to create a 'Golden Age' of stability, expand on their Empire and a lack of crisis among others. By the end of this essay, I hope to conclude how successful they were in laying these foundations, that many contemporaries term the Golden Age. The Conquest of Granada of 1482 can be regarded as a successful crusade in laying the foundations of Spain's Golden Age. ...read more.

Middle

They helped with the Reconquista after all, setting their minds away from home and onto war, but even then they still increased their power with more lands and possessions as rewards. On matters of royal finance, Ferdinand and Isabella were heavily reliant on expedients, for example the grants given by the Church and the Pope for the war in Granada. This wasn't setting a good example for their successors who would eventually be faced with long term financial damages. Certainly the monopoly of the silver and gold from the Americas dominated the economy of the two kingdoms and laid down the foundations of the Spanish Empire. But this was not put into good use and the monarchs were too dependent on it and spending it away, regarding it as easy money. Adding to their failures was Castile's production of wool, rather than cloth, which didn't develop any further as the government of the kingdoms weren't paying enough attention to it. As Geoffrey Woodward comments on the 'kingdoms resources being wasted and opportunities for investment were being lost due to muddle-headed thinking by the government'. The mesta, which was a trade union of sheep farmers, was in the control of the nobility. Any attempts to retrieve it would result in a strike back. The only thing keeping their economy from decline were the major trading ports of Valencia and Barcelona. ...read more.

Conclusion

By 1516, Castile was able to lay claims to Hispaniola, Cuba, Jamaica and Puerto Rico, adding more possessions to the Spanish state. But though they managed to gain more control in and out of Spain, the problems began to arise due to the fact that it was hard to govern conquered countries. The ecomienda system that was placed created powerful and wealthy individuals and it would be difficult to fight against them. In the perspective of Ferdinand and Isabella, they were very successful in laying the foundations of Spain's Golden Age. They created royal authority, increased the overseas empire, discovered the New World and conquered Granada. But from a whole perspective with these successes in mind, the build up to the Golden Age can not be regarded the same way. Ferdinand and Isabella didn't create religious unity and as a result many conversos and Jews were mistreated and along with the Muslims they were expelled or forced to convert to the Christian faith. The economic impact was a serious downfall for the monarchs and they took advantage of the Gold and Silver from the New Worlds. The term Golden Age refers to being perfect, but this is an impossible view to take upon as Spain couldn't and would never be a 'perfect' country. As Charles I would soon find out, Ferdinand and Isabella left a lot of damage for their successors to fix. Ferdinand and Isabella were successful in laying their foundations but it can not be termed as a Golden Age and more of nostalgia. WORD COUNT: 1837 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How successful was the government of King Philip II of Spain?

    Philip was painstaking and conscientious in his desire for even more information, demanding up to date reports from every regional governor on "cities, towns, sites, wilderness, rivers, of their advantages civil and military, their finances, manufactures and tributes.." Yet this hid an inability to distinguish between the important and the trivial and a temperamental unwillingness to make decisions.

  2. Why did a Civil War break out in Spain in 1936?

    Although these uprisings could be suppressed, the central government was unable to restore full confidence to its rule and resorted increasingly to corruption, as also H.Thomas has pointed out that 'By 1923 the Spanish parliamentary system was bruised almost to death.'

  1. How successful was Peel's Ministry 1841-1846?

    However, as Prime Minister of Britain he was using his skills as a leader and administrator not only to represent and benefit a small select group, but fairly to the whole nation. A successful ministry has to primarily address its nation and not its party's interests; this is what Peel's ministry did.

  2. COMBATING CORRUPTION IN BANGLADESH: SOME STRATEGIES

    Competition can also be strengthened by introducing greater transparency in the ownership structure and operations of firms and banks, through requirements of financial disclosure and arm's-length relationships, efficient registries, and better supervision of their operations by independent regularly bodies. Regulatory Reform Proper regulation of utility companies and other industries in which competition remains.

  1. Philosophical Foundations of the American Political System

    The Federalists, led by George Washington believed in a strong central government and supported the new writing of the Constitution. George Washington was a leader and advocate of the state's ratification process. He knew that to have the support needed he would need each and every state to support the Constitution's principles.

  2. How successful was Peel's 'Great Ministry' of 1841-46

    The income tax was a good idea because it would charge only 7 pence per pound on incomes over �130p.a. and wouldn't really effect these people. The income tax was originally proposed as a temporary measure for 3 years but it was so successful that Peel persuaded parliament to renew it for another 3 years.

  1. The Mexican Economy

    The Mexican economy grew at a healthy annual pace during the period from 1970 to 1974, but beginning in 1975 growth decreased markedly and inflation rose substantially. In an attempt to reduce the nation's foreign-trade deficit, the government in 1976 devalued the peso by more than 50 percent by changing from a fixed to a freely floating exchange rate.

  2. The Plurality System.

    Also in 1974 where labour won 301 seats with 37.2% of the vote when the conservative party won 297 seats with 37.9% of the vote. Although the system produces a single winning party, the party rarely wins an outright majority.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work