• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were the Labour governments of 1924 and of 1929-31?

Extracts from this document...


How successful were the Labour governments of 1924 and of 1929-31? In order to evaluate the success of the two Labour governments, one must first evaluate both the positive and negative aspects of both separately, and then come to a reasoned conclusion taking into account both governments and their respective positions and situations. The Labour government of 1924 displayed both positive and negative aspects. On the positive side, Labour had shown that it could actually run the country; indeed MacDonald said to the King, 'They have shown the country that they have the capacity to govern in an equal degree with the other parties in the House.' This was clearly a major area of success and proved the widespread view that 'Labour was unfit to govern' was wrong and also it was proof that MacDonald and the Labour party could be trusted to run the country efficiently. Secondly, the Labour Party had shown that it was a party of moderate centre-ground, by conducting itself responsibly and refuting the fears of a social upheaval on socialist lines. In essence, the Party had shown, over a time period, that it was capable of providing a more than satisfactory government and no doubt proved wrong all those doubters. MacDonald himself even said that they had done much to dispel 'the fantastic and extravagant belief which at one time found expression that they were nothing but a band of irresponsible revolutionaries intent on wreckage and destruction'. ...read more.


In the foreign sphere, the Labour government were relatively successful. However there was the issue of the Soviet Union, which was a negative and it led to the eventual collapse of the Labour government. MacDonald personally did not share the Party enthusiasm for friendship with the Soviet, however he choose to grant diplomatic recognition. However the mistake was to negotiate a commercial treaty with Russia, in which the British would be compensated for assets seized during the Bolshevik revolution and the British would therefore loan �30m to the Soviet. This was a mistake as it was extremely controversial, and immediately it was attacked by the Conservatives, and eventually the Liberals (with the added input of Lloyd George) attacked it thus seemingly leaving the Labour government doomed. The Labour government of 1929 was again a minority government, however it was the biggest single party, but it must then be noted that in the event that the Liberals and Conservatives combined - Labour could be defeated. In general, the domestic situation remained stable and unemployment was still a serious problem. In terms of the positives for the new Labour government; these appeared significantly in foreign affairs. Although MacDonald and the new Foreign Secretary, Henderson, often disagreed, together they accomplished quite a lot. Examples of their achievements include the Young Plan, in which Henderson took the lead in order to reduce international tension. ...read more.


In conclusion, when comparing both governments to each other, the Labour government of 1924 was much more successful than that of 1929. Perhaps this was because the country's expectations of Labour were originally very low, and so by running the country sufficiently (and successfully), the government appeared more successful. The positives from 1924 far outweigh the positives from 1929, as in 1924 - the government proved it could run the country, it stakes it's claim to the moderate centre-ground, it achieved goals in the housing and education markets, and when it actually was defeated - it managed to escape relatively unscathed. In 1929 - there were advantages especially in Foreign Affairs with international conciliation and improved relations, however this did not work with the colonial issues. Furthermore with the stock-market crash of October 1929 - this put Labour into an extremely undesirable position and one in which it failed to deal with even adequately. In 1929 there were the negative of the weakness on policy, especially with unemployment, and this continued with the next government. In terms of individual success, the 1924 government was extremely successful as it proved the majority of people wrong that Labour could run the country. The 1929 government was more successful in foreign policy however it failed to solve the domestic problems and for a government to work properly - the domestic situation must be positive. Therefore the 1929 Labour government was rather unsuccessful as a government. 09/05/2007 History (ISJ) Aman Janmohamed (NPS) Page 1 of 4 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How successful was Lord Liverpool in responding to radical challenge from 1812-1822?

    Much disorder was actually provoked by the government - either indirectly through policies which placed intolerable burdens upon the poor or directly through the practice of employing agent's provocateurs who encouraged lawbreaking so that they could collect a reward by informing on the law breakers.

  2. Do you agree that labour was "betrayed" by Ramsay MacDonald in 1931?

    betrayed labour however, I can see that he did what he thought was good for the nation and as a result he was seen to have made the wrong choice. As I begin to unwind the information I see that Ramsay MacDonald was a good leader who thought best for his country.

  1. Why Did the Liberals Experience a Constitutional Crisis in the Period 1909-1911? How Successful ...

    defeat; also to the continuing difficulties in the party over tariff reform and the failure of any other coherent policies to emerge for the social and economic tensions of the period. Much of the blame for this bitter social and political conflict must surely lie with the Liberal Party.

  2. "Weimar Republic governments were remarkably successful in dealing with the economic and political problems ...

    Over all it can be seen that there were many severe political problems. However there is no evidence to suggest that any of these problems were dealt with in any way what so ever. As previously mentioned the Republic faced threats from both the Left and the Right.

  1. personal exercis programme

    This will mean that you will steadily improve in the aspect of fitness you are training for. If the athlete completes the previous training with considerable ease, then there is the need to increase the difficulty of the exercise. In relation to cardiovascular fitness, a constant amount of exercise will

  2. How significant was The First World War in the Labour Party's rise to second-party ...

    "24 He also continues to discuss how Bonar Law and Stanley Baldwin set out, after the fall of Lloyd George from the coalition, to promote the Conservatives as "the party of resistance"25 against the growing "threat to the existing social order posed by the rise of Labour."26 Moore discusses how

  1. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    With stability, over time, has to come real improvements in productivity and investment from business itself" (www.pmo.gov.uk, May 4, 2004). Moving on, the New Labour ran a budget surplus in early years till 2001, while Thatcher also had a budget surplus in 1989-90.

  2. How far do you agree that the role of the Trade Unions was the ...

    During the Period of 1945-51 Labour found itself once again short of money and so they took a loan from the USA and Canada, which allowed them to continue the construction of their welfare state. Unfortunately as part of the loan Britain agreed to increase it's spending on Civil Defence

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work