• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were the Labour governments of 1924 and of 1929-31?

Extracts from this document...


How successful were the Labour governments of 1924 and of 1929-31? In order to evaluate the success of the two Labour governments, one must first evaluate both the positive and negative aspects of both separately, and then come to a reasoned conclusion taking into account both governments and their respective positions and situations. The Labour government of 1924 displayed both positive and negative aspects. On the positive side, Labour had shown that it could actually run the country; indeed MacDonald said to the King, 'They have shown the country that they have the capacity to govern in an equal degree with the other parties in the House.' This was clearly a major area of success and proved the widespread view that 'Labour was unfit to govern' was wrong and also it was proof that MacDonald and the Labour party could be trusted to run the country efficiently. Secondly, the Labour Party had shown that it was a party of moderate centre-ground, by conducting itself responsibly and refuting the fears of a social upheaval on socialist lines. In essence, the Party had shown, over a time period, that it was capable of providing a more than satisfactory government and no doubt proved wrong all those doubters. MacDonald himself even said that they had done much to dispel 'the fantastic and extravagant belief which at one time found expression that they were nothing but a band of irresponsible revolutionaries intent on wreckage and destruction'. ...read more.


In the foreign sphere, the Labour government were relatively successful. However there was the issue of the Soviet Union, which was a negative and it led to the eventual collapse of the Labour government. MacDonald personally did not share the Party enthusiasm for friendship with the Soviet, however he choose to grant diplomatic recognition. However the mistake was to negotiate a commercial treaty with Russia, in which the British would be compensated for assets seized during the Bolshevik revolution and the British would therefore loan �30m to the Soviet. This was a mistake as it was extremely controversial, and immediately it was attacked by the Conservatives, and eventually the Liberals (with the added input of Lloyd George) attacked it thus seemingly leaving the Labour government doomed. The Labour government of 1929 was again a minority government, however it was the biggest single party, but it must then be noted that in the event that the Liberals and Conservatives combined - Labour could be defeated. In general, the domestic situation remained stable and unemployment was still a serious problem. In terms of the positives for the new Labour government; these appeared significantly in foreign affairs. Although MacDonald and the new Foreign Secretary, Henderson, often disagreed, together they accomplished quite a lot. Examples of their achievements include the Young Plan, in which Henderson took the lead in order to reduce international tension. ...read more.


In conclusion, when comparing both governments to each other, the Labour government of 1924 was much more successful than that of 1929. Perhaps this was because the country's expectations of Labour were originally very low, and so by running the country sufficiently (and successfully), the government appeared more successful. The positives from 1924 far outweigh the positives from 1929, as in 1924 - the government proved it could run the country, it stakes it's claim to the moderate centre-ground, it achieved goals in the housing and education markets, and when it actually was defeated - it managed to escape relatively unscathed. In 1929 - there were advantages especially in Foreign Affairs with international conciliation and improved relations, however this did not work with the colonial issues. Furthermore with the stock-market crash of October 1929 - this put Labour into an extremely undesirable position and one in which it failed to deal with even adequately. In 1929 there were the negative of the weakness on policy, especially with unemployment, and this continued with the next government. In terms of individual success, the 1924 government was extremely successful as it proved the majority of people wrong that Labour could run the country. The 1929 government was more successful in foreign policy however it failed to solve the domestic problems and for a government to work properly - the domestic situation must be positive. Therefore the 1929 Labour government was rather unsuccessful as a government. 09/05/2007 History (ISJ) Aman Janmohamed (NPS) Page 1 of 4 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How successful was the government of King Philip II of Spain?

    Men such as Marquis of Mon�jar in Granada and the Duke of medina were therefore extremely powerful and had vested interest in fulfilling Philips wishes of law and order. The sixty six corregidors therefore had crucial roles in fulfilling political, administrative and judicial authority.

  2. Did the Labour Party show that it could govern Britain competently in the years ...

    This was the course favoured by Labour's Chancellor, Phillip Snowden. Cambridge economist John Keynes and trade union leader Ernest Bevin advised coming off the "Gold Standard", which had been fixed since 1925, and probably over-valued. Abandoning the "Gold Standard" would allow Sterling to float downwards and thus make British exports

  1. How successful was Lord Liverpool in responding to radical challenge from 1812-1822?

    Much disorder was actually provoked by the government - either indirectly through policies which placed intolerable burdens upon the poor or directly through the practice of employing agent's provocateurs who encouraged lawbreaking so that they could collect a reward by informing on the law breakers.

  2. How successful was Peel's Ministry 1841-1846?

    Although Peel had the backing of many Ultra Tories to get into government, Peel had very much created a 'new' conservative party that stated they would reform if and when they saw necessary. In 1846 Peel saw the 'Corn Laws' as the last major obstacle of achieving free trade.

  1. It is not enough for governments to have power, they must also have authority

    However, this does somewhat justify citizens to defend themselves with weapons if the state is deemed oppressive and ruthless. So, it is fair to say that although the government does not need authority to impose its will, a misuse of power will simply lead to rebellion and perhaps even civil war.

  2. personal exercis programme

    This will mean that you will steadily improve in the aspect of fitness you are training for. If the athlete completes the previous training with considerable ease, then there is the need to increase the difficulty of the exercise. In relation to cardiovascular fitness, a constant amount of exercise will

  1. Calvin in Geneva

    as one, this meant that Calvinism would be more appealing and identify with more people. This would work in Calvin's favour when he eventually reached Geneva in August 1536. At the time of Calvin's arrival Geneva was a newly independent state, having recently declared it's political independence from the Holy

  2. How successful were Ferdinand and Isabella in laying the foundations of Spain's Golden Age?

    And more importantly, after the death of Isabella in 1504, civil war broke out again and showed how the kingdoms were still separate. But the positives show that the Reconquista was successful as it established Ferdinand's and Isabella's reputation as monarchs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work