• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In 1919 the coal industry was in a good state as there was good trade with foreign countries and export in coal was high. The Miner's Federation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. At the beginning of the War the county had high hopes. War Socialism had been brought in, this was the country's industries being geared up toward the war effort, this included the mines being nationalised, and many miners hoped that they would stay nationalised after the war. The miners at that time liked the government and some even joined the armed forces, the miners were patriotic to England. In 1919 the coal industry was in a good state as there was good trade with foreign countries and export in coal was high. The Miner's Federation thought that now was the time to push for higher wages and better conditions and standards for their miners. They thought the government would listen to them as miners made up to 16% of the working population in Great Britain at that time. Some of the changes they wanted were: An increase in wages by a third, fixed wages, a six hour day and immediate nationalism. If the government fixed wages then there was going to be a general increase in wages as all mines would be brought in line with each other. If the government nationalised the mines then it would have to set up a department for mines and would have had to pay for a whole new department. ...read more.

Middle

strength, the mine union did not believe this and thought that the mine owners could have decreased profits; the TUC was now backing them. Later on that month on Friday 31 July 1925, the government gave the miners a subsidy; they paid the miners for nine months without an increase or decrease in pay. The miner's unions thought they had won and rejoiced. The government always had a bad view of unions like the TUC as they as they rightly saw it a contestant to their power Little did they know that the government had a plan. The government knew they could not win a strike without proper and thought out planning. Their plan was to pay the unions for nine months or until the money ran out, then they would have had set in place proper control of raw materials. Once the money ran out they hoped that the workers would go to work soon as they were not earning any money and were not able to put food on the table for their families, but if they decided to prolong the strike then government would just wait, the government was going to wait for them to eventually give in. The government was going to fight a prolonged strike. Once the government was ready they started negotiations then made up a story about a printer not printing a story, and stopped talks. ...read more.

Conclusion

police managed to stop them and that they were baffled by the expertise of the police, whereas we know for a fact that this never happened. The other way the government could get back at the TUC was by making posters which portrayed them in a good light and the TUC as a deceitful and shady character. The government managed to stop printers printing some of the TUC papers and managed to stop any defence they had to the government attacks. The media the general public received was that of the government's not the TUC's and the TUC had very little defence Volunteers of the OMS were shown as helpful. By winning the support of the public by the use of propaganda and influencing the type of media they received the government managed to get the public to dislike and hate the miner's struggle. The government managed to win to battle against the miners, by buying time with the miners so they could prepare a defence against the miner's strike, by having a great propaganda campaign on all forms of media, and the TUC helped the government to victory by having weak, pathetic leaders who did not organise attacks on the propaganda onslaught they received from the government the TUC leaders had a weaker paper and were less aggressive as the government and where very submissive and passive. IV Karel Kumar 10S History Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 fail and what were the effects the ...

    Nevertheless, after the General Strike it responded with a new Trade Dispute Act which made general strikes illegal, tried to severe the financial link between trade unions and the Labour Party and made picketing much more difficult. The government's intentions was to drive the trade unions back into their 'labourist'

  2. Is immigration good or bad.

    This can let the readers make up their own decisions about immigration instead of influencing them on which side to pick from. According to the Daily Mail immigrants are coming in draining resources. This is creating unprecedented pressure on schools, hospitals and roads.

  1. The Negative Impact Of World War 1 On Italy: Weaknesses Of The Liberal State, ...

    Italy8 The Changing Focus of Fascism: Part 1 - Mussolini and Fascism to November 1919 Between the end of the war and the end of 1919 Mussolini was an insignificant figure in Italian politics. His nationalist, republican (Italy still had a King), democratic and radical social reform policies failed to win support from the electorate (voters).

  2. How and why did Federation occur?

    and Local (Shellharbour Council). Why did Australia restrict non-white immigration? * After 1850 Chinese made up a large group in Australia. They were seen as different with a different culture and looked different. They were seen as the first 'Yellow Peril".

  1. Is There Sufficient Evidence in Sources A to F to Explain Why the T.U.C. ...

    The Strike could be perceived as a class war. Perhaps people believed the working classes were trying to hold the rest of the country to account for its hardships. Others believed it was just two obstinate groups of people on a collision course and assumed they would work out their problems.

  2. HUMANITIES COURSEWORK

    are dying spontaneously without a support of a medic or an Ambulance. These effects had been growing problems on both sides. This reflects just how disruption this constant conflict is causing. No one feels safe anymore; life to them is day to day struggle.

  1. Nationalism as applied to business

    the support of poor low-caste and dalit Hindus in the northern, and most populated states of India like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Almost every Indian state has a regional party devoted solely to the culture of the native people. Unlike the Akali Dal and the AGP, these mostly cannot be

  2. In what ways did the British government attempt to change the government of India ...

    The Muslim League led by M. A. Jinnah boycotted the Simon Commission but later on Jinnah decided it would be better for the Muslim League to co-operate with the British as it would be a better way to get the British to leave India Another community that co-operated with the British were the Untouchables.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work