• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, describe the voting behaviour in Scotland and the future constitutional relationship between Scotland and Westminster.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Unlike Wales, which was subdued by conquest in the thirteenth century, Scotland was never permanently incorporated into the United Kingdom by force of arms. In 1603 the succession of James I to the throne of England united the crowns of England and Scotland. However, the union was only a personal one and Scotland retained its own political and legal system and its own church. In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, describe the voting behaviour in Scotland and the future constitutional relationship between Scotland and Westminster. The establishment of a common Parliament occurred as a result of the Treaty of Union of union of 1707, whereby the Scots gained political representation at Westminster but were guaranteed that certain features of their administrative system would remain inviolate and Scotland would retain for all time key institutions. The legal system, Church of Scotland, Education System and Royal Burghs. Nationalism is an important element in Scottish politics. This reflects the belief in the nation being a group of people with shared values, customs, language, history and traditions. Nationalism as a concept is a political doctrine believing in the idea that the nation is the central principle for political organisation. Patriotism is different from nationalism and can be classed as "cultural" nationalism" in which there is a desire to maintain a distinctive culture or way of live. ...read more.

Middle

Their poverty was compounded by the large families which the Church encouraged. Once the Church accepted that the Labour Party was not hostile to religion, the social circumstances of Catholics pushed them overwhelmingly into voting Labour. At the same time their religious ties made them less susceptible either to Conservative appeals to support the (Protestant) British state or to nationalists harking back to the traditions of a largely Presbyterian Scotland. The concentration of Catholics in the West of Scotland makes the habit of Labour voting hard to break and Labour is, as a result, the dominant party in Scotland. Opinion polls indicated that one third of the electorate within Scotland favoured some form of independence and that over 40% wanted a devolved assembly with some taxation and spending power with support for the status quo rarely exceeding 20%. In the run up to the 1992 election opinion polls recorded an increase in constitutional change and one poll in the Scotsman showed that 50% of the population favoured independence. Psychologists estimated that the nationalists might increase their share of seats from 3 to 9 and the Conservatives to drop around 3. The main complaint from Scots was about the nature of policies being decided at Westminster which were being imposed upon them but were in fact not voted for by the Scottish MP's. ...read more.

Conclusion

One Scottish Executive Minister commented: "Westminster has no impact on Scotland; the separation is quite astonishing [it is] much more so than anyone would have realised." It is clear that many councillors still retain significant levels of contact with Westminster MPs. This indicates the continuing importance of UK party political contact within Scottish political networks. Although the Scottish Parliament has many responsibilities the bank of England still decides Scotland's economic fate and the central UK government dictate how key policies should proceed and the UK parliament Prime Minister determines Scotland's future. The Scottish parliament deals with devolved matters and the UK Parliament with reserved matters. The 1707 Act of Union did not create a unitary state as often assumed. The common Parliament was central to the union but its role was limited as much of Scotland's decisions were made through the separate institutions so therefore there were many reasons why Scotland should function as an independent country. Problems still exist however within a back lash from English Citizens claiming that Scottish MP's still vote in Westminster but English MP's have no say in Scottish affairs. While there are tensions in the complex relationship between the tiers of government, the general view is that things have improved for local government since devolution. "Things are better than they were before devolution. They are not as good as they could be but I think that is a development issue; things will improve. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. What impact did Mao have on the lives of the Chinese people from 1949 ...

    Propaganda was used to try to influence the Chinese people towards the Communist Party's views and ideas. Mao did not want people to think independently and used his loyal Party workers as 'propagandists' to spread Communist ideas. Overall, there were 1.5 million propagandists in workplaces such as factories, up to 10 per cent of the workforce were propagandists.

  2. Pakistan's Political and Economic Development

    But this in no way suggests that military regimes are better for economic growth than civilian governments, but does indicate that to have sustainable economic growth you need a stable political system, and surprisingly enough in the case of Pakistan it has been provided by the military organization rather than elected chosen governments of the people.

  1. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    The subject of nationalism has been ever present in Scotland, although they had to wait until 1999 to gain any control over their home affairs. Once finalised, the Scottish Parliament had 129 members, a Chief Minister who selects the Cabinet, tax raising powers, the right to make laws and the

  2. For my creative piece I have written a short story set in the future, ...

    I have posted many letters to magazines, even yours, all of which have not been published through fear of breaking the law." "Wait a minute. Something doesn't add up! What happened to the wig you bought?" "Erm, well you see. Oh what the heck I'll just tell you the truth.

  1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the devolution process in Scotland and Wales?

    Sub national governments have reflected the different regions. Devolution has meant that both Scotland and Wales have a clearer sense of their country. For Labour and the Liberal Democrats one of the best arguments for devolution was the idea that it would head off demands for full independence.

  2. Political accountability -Parliament and the courts

    law claim can be based on the fact that the claimants' original actions were ultra vires. Judicial review will only lie against bodies exercising public duties. However, 'public duties' is not always easy to define, and the scope of judicial review has expanded over the years.

  1. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    This policy was disastrous when famine struck as it meant there was no way of rectifying the situation. Theodore Hoppen, a modern historian, holds the view that: "Although the Government's response was extremely inefficient, grudging and limited, perhaps only an authoritarian state committed to the welfare of the poor at

  2. Some have noted the weak role of Dail Eireann within the Irish political system. ...

    Debates are limited in what they achieve in terms of impacting on government behaviour. For example, debates of no confidence are routinely defeated, and opposition TDs use the occasion to publicly criticise the government, as they know their chances of actually removing the government are miniscule (ibid.).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work