• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

IN WHAT WAYS IS BRITAIN DEMOCRATIC

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

IN WHAT WAYS IS BRITAIN DEMOCRATIC? The electorate in the United Kingdom have privileges regarding involvement in their democratic system unlike many other citizens of the World. In 1867 working class men were first given the right to vote, followed by the vote for women in 1918, a consequence of the suffragettes movements. In the twenty-first century the majority of the British public who are seen as deserving of the right to vote and have the mental capacity to make the judgement have the right to participate in local and general elections as well as referenda. This follows the principle of political equality for all. Citizens can also join parties (no age restriction), with the possible aim of representing the views of their arty as well as their constituents. The barriers for standing in office are not overly restrictive and with support the role is achievable. This means that as long as the party is legal they are free to operate. In turn this offers a wide range of political viewpoints, giving the electorate a greater choice. ...read more.

Middle

Voting is used to elect local councillors and members of parliament. This form of representative democracy allows the electorates view to be voiced on a range of issues from local and national, the constituent also has the power to communicate with their MP to help them make well-informed decisions with regard their constituent's opinion. Since devolution of power Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales the electorate are also able to choose the ministers for their own assemblies. These assemblies decide on issues such as culture, national language and tourism, allowing each of the 3 countries to gain an amount of independence from the Commons. The ministers concerned with their own country can make more intelligent decisions. Referenda may also be used on difficult issues on which the Commons is particularly undecided, this increases the level of democracy, and instead of being a representative democracy it is a direct democracy. Meaning that the electorate's power is increased. Unfortunately this form of direct democracy cannot be used for every issue raised in the House of Commons as it would soon loose its appeal and the electorate would become bored of the system. ...read more.

Conclusion

The British legal system is also evidence for a high level of democracy; juries are now decided from the electoral register randomly meaning that interference/ influence is less common. In any democracy the independence of the judiciary from political control is a fundamental protector of civil freedoms. By having these juries the decisions made within the courts of laws are less biased and do not have the influence of politicians or the monarchy. The British media, unlike many others in the World have freedom of speech, thought and expression, just as the citizens of Britain have although there are needed legal restrictions on this. This means that the public can gain a relatively knowledgeable account of the true political situation in Britain. Hence there is very little propaganda and censorship (except with regard intelligence), deriving from the government allowing independent thought. There are a great number of factors that contribute to the democratic features in Britain that are generic throughout many of the world's democracy's such as: USA and Japan. These countries like most democracies have a growing middle class and have capitalist companies that are key to their economy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    The English also had a qualification for the courts. It was used for all contracts and petitions to the government. When Maitland held the governorship of Malta, Mattei was the Archbishop of Malta. It is not clear whether Maitland professed any religion or not, but it is certain that no exception can be taken to his approach towards the

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Under STV all existing MPs can stand for election, and may have an advantage in being better known than their new colleagues. MPs could become bogged down in casework. There is no evidence in Britain that local casework-based candidates poll better than national names, often voters like to be represented

  1. How Democratic is the UK?

    The government is not actually bound by a superior entrenched constitution as other countries such as America and France are, this enables the government to change policies and pass laws much easier than they could is the constitution was entrenched, however it can be argued that this makes us a

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragettes and the Suffragists were ...

    To do this the Election Fighting Fun (EFF) was set up in order to challenge the seats of anti-suffrage, Liberal MPs, which impressed both the Labour and Liberal Parties. This was a great show of strength for the Suffragists and even better, it was entirely within the law and seemed to be playing the government at its own game.

  1. Is the UK democratic?

    Since the turnout in the 2001 UK general election was inversely proportional to the majority, the greater the proportion of the electorate did not bother to vote. Elections are not won or lost in safe seats, but in the marginal seats.

  2. COMBATING CORRUPTION IN BANGLADESH: SOME STRATEGIES

    Corruption reinforces political instability and underdevelopment (Ouma, 1991). In short, corruption impedes economic growth, stifles entrepreneurialism, misuses scarce national resources, weakens administrative capacity, contributes to serious political decay and undermines stability, democracy and national integration (Theobald, 1990). COMBATING CORRUPTION STRATEGIES Combating corruption is not easy task.

  1. Assess the view that devolution, under the Good Friday Agreement, created a more democratic ...

    Yet on several occasions these small numbers of NI Mp's have infact extended some considerable influence. For instance during John Majors government ministry (1991-1997) due to a reduced majority, the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP)

  2. How democratic is Britain?

    An example of this is Bedford, which has a high conservative turn out and because of this anyone wishing to vote for a different party will probably not be heard or your political views represented in parliament. So Britain cannot be a true democracy because not everyone is being represented fairly through our voting system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work