• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Indian independence - source based work with the sources.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Indian independence---- coursework SOURCES: Source A: from an interview given by M.K. Gandhi in 1942 to a US writer. This was published in a biography of Gandhi in 1954: The 'Quit India' campaign has arisen because Indians realise that if India is to fight for democracy against Germany, Italy and Japan, she must have the prospect of freedom herself. How can we fight for democracy when we have not got it ourselves? I do not want Japan to win I do not want the Axis to win, But I am sure that Britain cannot win unless the Indian people become free _____________________________________________________________________ Source B: From the autobiography of Jawaharlal Nehru, published in 1962. The idea of a great country like India being treated as a mere possession and he people utterly and contemptuously ignored was bitterly resented. One man, the Viceroy, and he a foreigner, could plunge four hundred millions of human beings into a war without the slightest reference to them. There was something fundamentally wrong in a system under which the fate of millions could be decided in this way. _____________________________________________________________________ Source C: a statement made by Muhammad Ali Jinnah in the 1940s There are only two links between Muslims and Hindus: British rule - and the common desire to get rid of it. _____________________________________________________________________ Source D: from the memoirs of Stafford Cripps, who was a member of the Labour government from 1945 to 1950: After 1945 we were demobilising the British armed forces as rapidly as possible, and that meant that the number of British troops, which could be left in India and the East, was being diminished. ...read more.

Middle

Source E is also very useful as it is an eyewitness account of Direct Action Day by a Briton who presumably is not biased. It tells us that the situation in India was well out of the control of the British and the situation was deteriorating by the minute. If from one protest and one place people from one religion can kill people from another, you could imagine what would happen all over India if Britain did not do anything. Source E shows communal violence was escalating. 'You could see a crop of one religion or another' 'being laid on their faces' ' and being beheaded into the river' ' the river was literally choked with dead bodies'. The British knew they had to give India independence but the question that was delaying this was how to give independence. _____________________________________________________________________ Study sources F and G Use sources F and G, and your own knowledge, to help you explain why India was partitioned in 1947. India was partitioned in 1947 as a last alternative. After years of talks and the failure of the Cripps mission it was quite obvious that there was no way you could get the Muslims and Hindus to live to together peacefully. The two people had nothing in common but their nationality. There religion, language, writing and the way of living life was different. For e.g. the slaughtering of cows by Muslims was offensive to Hindus who consider the cow a sacred animal. Hindu revivalists rallied for a ban on the slaughter of cows, a cheap source of meat for Muslims. ...read more.

Conclusion

Muhammad Ali Jinnah made the statement (source C) in 1940, the year he demanded the creation of Pakistan and the time when he had the support of the British. He was making the point that Hindus and Muslims and their aims were fundamentally different except for one thing 'British rule-and the common desire to get rid of it'. To him Muslims were a completely different race who were only helping the Hindus to be free of British rule so that they could get what Jinnah, their leader, was aiming for. Source A, an interview given by M.K.Gandhi in 1942, the year when he got locked up and Japan had reached Burma. He is using moral arguments to tell he's people not to help the British. He is in particular trying to remind the people who are helping the British, army in particular, that they are fighting for freedom when they themselves are like captives in their own land. 'How can we fight for democracy when we have not got it ourselves?' Source B, from the autobiography of Jawaharlal Nehru. He probably wrote it in 1939, the year WW2 started because he is referring to how Indians are sent to war without a slightest reference to them. He is saying that how could a foreigner put the lives of four hundred million Indians in danger as fast as blinking an eye. ' The idea of a great country like India being treated as a mere possession'. In the end the evidence of all the sources come down to one point, which is British rule and what could be gained from freedom. Mohammed Shuaib 10i ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. 'Nationalist Groups in the Sub-Continent played the most significant role in Britain's decision to ...

    Jinnah had pushed and worked hard and as leader of the Muslim League refused to co-operate with the Congress in making a constitution and decided on 'direct action' to obtain a separate Pakistan. This was after the announcement that the Governor-General of India, Lord Wavell, invited Nehru to form an interim government in August 1946.

  2. Party system in India

    The factors that helped Congress party to assume the role of a dominant ruling party * The Congress party was had a pre-eminent position in the eyes of the public as a party committed to the protection and promotion of national interest because of its role in the national movement.

  1. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    mentioned the effects of World War I on the Indian population, preferring to concentrate on Gandhi, it can be argued that Spear's argument is stronger than Nanda's because he was analysing the overall situation; it would be tendentious to assume, as Nanda does, that the War did little to change how life was lived.

  2. Using your own knowledge and the evidence of Sources 1, 3 and 5 what ...

    parliaments" and "invented a thousand tricks", showing that Colonel Hutchinson felt Cromwell had become irresponsible with the increased power, and was acting in self-interest. But, the modified version of the Humble Petition and Advice which Cromwell accepted showed there was a desire for healing and settling.

  1. Critically examine how Mahatma Gandhi used the concept of non-violence as a practical tool ...

    It was apparent that the British would not voluntarily leave in wartime, so Gandhi must have realised that the success of mass disorder would mean a revolution. His stand, reluctantly accepted by his colleagues, unleashed wild forces and set a dangerous precedent for the post-war period (ibid.).

  2. The Life and Times of Dr. Kwame Nkrumah The Road to Ghana's Colonial Independence

    maintenance in power through any means including coup d'�tat of puppet regimes in Africa. Later Nkrumah would state "In this book I exposed the economic stranglehold exercised by foreign monopolistic complexes such as the Anglo-American Corporation, and illustrated the ways in which this financial grip perpetuated the paradox of Africa poverty in the midst of plenty.

  1. Assess the Extent to which the Different Powers Prepared 'Their' African Colonies for Independence.

    For instance it is interesting to note that out of all the ex-colonial powers France is the only one to still have a distinctive African policy and in some ways have not really left. In saying that, Tony Blair has recently attempted to switch Britain's focus to Africa, albeit to take eyes away from the Iraq question.

  2. Source based work on Conservative Supremacy - around 1891.

    An example of this is the Workers Compensation Act 1897 which gave the workers the right to compensation without having to prove negligence. Even though it appeared to be radical legislation the reality was that it was simply a compromise to keep Chamberlain muted.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work