• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Internal disunity was the main reason for the failure of Chartism.' To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Internal disunity was the main reason for the failure of Chartism.' To what extent do you agree with this statement? By the time the petition was rejected in 1848 it can be seen that Chartism had lost its importance amongst its former supporters and to the government and thus dying out as an important political campaign movement. A big question that has remained amongst historians is the cause of this downfall of a once hugely popular movement that 'effectively raised fundamental constitutional questions in Parliament and rattled the bars of the establishment' (H.Browne). In this essay I shall discuss whether or not the internal disunity of the Chartists was the main reason for their failure or was it as a result of many other factors including the following; no general middles-class support for cross-class alliance, power of the state that enabled them to make mass arrests, exhaustion of constitutional means to reform, the strategy and tactics used by the chartists and the effective abandonment of the charter by the majority after 1848. The chartist movement was one that had a tendency to break up due to arguments amongst the key leader figures in the organisation. Some believe that this internal disunity showed that the chartists were not politically nor intellectually mature enough to obtain and use the vote. ...read more.

Middle

With the help of the middle classes the chartists could have gained more attention from the government; as they would have been fearful of the results of the combinations of the working and middle classes and thus may have paid more attention to the ploys of the chartists. The chartist received much opposition and hostility from those within the House of Commons and the Government, who were mainly the landed interest as they believed the Chartists to be a potential threat to public order and who should be 'contained' many had no intention of conceding in anyway to there demands or even accepting there was a case. This in it's self can be seen as a reason why the chartist campaign failed, facing such opposition as they clearly did, with no way into the house of commons how were the chartist going to produce the changes they wished for. Nothing that the chartists were campaigning for was in the mood of the political times of those who had 'stake in the country.' It almost seems that it would be impossible for the Chartists to get the changes they wanted and reforms they believed were needed until England's rulers had accepted the need for a more democratic government, as without the cross-class alliance and virtually no support in the Houses of Commons reform through pressure form the Chartists alone looked very unlikely to be beneficial. ...read more.

Conclusion

The chartist believed strongly that improvements and reforms to working class life couldn't come without the vote, so when changes occurred such as the Mines Act 1842, the abolition of the Poor Law Commission in 1847 and the 'Ten Hour' Act in 1847, it become clear that reform was possible without the vote, such reforms many believed came as result of agitation to make issues clear to the government. In conclusion it should be said that to say 'Internal disunity' was the sole reason for the failure of the chartist is untrue, although the lack of clear leadership between differing types of chartist some believing in 'moral force' some in 'physical force' caused agreements and wasted internal disagreements these problems can't be seen as the main causes to the failure. The sheer power of the Government, Judiciary and army stood in the face of the Chartists and to overcome this and the attitudes of many at this time would have been an almighty task for any political organisation. The chartist were a group that put pressure on the government and made many in the society open their eyes to some of the possible changes that should take place yet it seemed that until society and those within the political system felt change was needed little could be done, thus resulting in the abandonment by the majority of the charter after 1848. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent was ‘Inept Leadership’ responsible for the failure of Chartism?

    For these reasons I feel that the responsibility of 'inept leadership' in bringing the failure of Chartism is probably minimal at best. It was the figurehead of the "literate and sophisticated working class"4, which continued to develop until all but one of the important points of the Charter were realised.

  2. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    The two also disagreed about the involvement of the middle classes. Whilst Lovett thought it was essential, O'Connor was firmly opposed. Such divisions at such an important level could only have a negative influence on the movement and it's eventual direction.

  1. Why was Chartism a failure?

    Possibly the strongest reason why Chartism failed was due to the strength of Peel's government. The passage of the Rural Police Act in 1839 ensured that a nationwide police force was able to monitor and deal with any outbreak of discontent.

  2. WWI, The Twenty-One Demands and The May Fourth Movement

    C.Y, The rise of modern China, 1990, Oxford University Press, Australia, p12 Lynch, Michael, 1998, China From Empire to People's Republic, The Bath Press, Bath Marcombe, M and Fielding, M. The Spirit of Change China in Revolution, 1999, McGraw-Hill Ross, John [editor], Chronicle of the 20th Century, 1990, Jacques Legrand

  1. To what extent was religion the main causeOf rebellion in the reign of Henry ...

    The monasteries in the north provided a huge boost to the local economy. During hard times the local monasteries provided charity and help for those less fortunate. The monasteries provided jobs for locals, such as building and gardening work. Abbeys also made sure that roads and bridges were in a

  2. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    several criminal convictions, including a 25-year sentence for hijacking and terrorism connected to the October 12, 1999 coup, and also for numerous pending charges of financial corruption during his tenure in the prime minister's office. Pakistani news organizations report that the agreement had been brokered in secrecy by members of the Saudi royal family.

  1. To what extent are the experiences and attitudes of Yang Digong and Li Zucui ...

    Mao Zedong made a speech on October 1st 1949 stating everything that the Chinese communist party should accomplish. By going through the list I can see what they have actually done and what they haven't. The first thing that Mao said is that 'The people's Republic of China strives for independence.'

  2. The failure of Chartism was due to improved economical conditions rather than the movement's ...

    In addition the railways set up in Britain at the time helped in transporting troops to areas where there were violence had broken out. With reforms came a strong government which remained consistent over the decision to exclude power to the lower classes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work