• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Britain a Democracy?

Extracts from this document...


Is Britain a Democracy? (First Draft) Britain is, for the most part, a good example of a democratic state. For the purpose of this essay, I will assume that by the term democracy means the amount of power and control that the people of a community or society have over the decisions and actions of the ruling elite. However, one must not assume that Britain being a democracy is necessarily a good thing for the country, nor that all decent, straight-thinking people support democracy, indeed, some would argue that sometimes a strong dictatorship is what a country needs. On the surface, Britain would appear to be a model of democracy. In Britain, there are general elections every five years when the people can vote a party out of power if they feel that the government hadn't succeeded in doing what they set out to do. Elections are completely open and free; everyone who is over the age of 18 and holds UK citizenship is encouraged to vote. We have general elections to vote for a party but there are even more elections through which the people can choose a local councillor or an MP or even an MEP. ...read more.


Brits also have the right to freedom of race, religion and sexuality. Upon closer analysis, it becomes clear that certain aspects of Britain's democracy are not quite so democratic. Although elections in Britain are completely free and open, there are certain drawbacks to them. General elections occur once every five years, which seems a reasonable timetable for an election which could lead to change of government, however, the Prime Minister can decide to hold elections at any time he chooses before the five year period ends, perhaps when he is at his most popular. This supports the 'Elective Dictator Thesis', which was promoted by the Conservative, Lord Halisham in the late '70s. The Elective Dictator Thesis states that it is democratic to have elections and elections are what we have in Britain, however, during the minimum five years a party is in office, the public is practically helpless to influence government decisions or actions. Put simply, a party could be voted into power and then that party would have a free reign over the country and if the people were unhappy and the government ignored them, all the people could do is wait for five years and vote the party out. ...read more.


In Britain at the moment, there only a partial separation of powers as the spheres of government are somewhat merged. And the powers are not entirely balanced, with the executive holding the most power. There is an element of checks and balances between the spheres, however this checking does not interfere much with decision making because if there were more checks and more separation of powers, there would be more democracy but decision making would be much slower and this would portray the government as weak and indecisive. Some hold the elitist view, which proposes that the real power holders are always out of public view and are unaffected by the electoral system. Ken Livingstone once said, '...if voting changed anything, they'd abolish it...' Minority views are also an issue with British democracy. By the current system, if in a general election, Party A gets 599 votes and Party B gets 600 votes, Party B gets into office and the 599 people who voted for Party A will go unrepresented. (Apathy?) In closing, the British system of democracy is broadly democratic. Compared to other countries, Britain is a shining beacon of democracy, however, there are small but significant sections of the system, which are undemocratic and could be improved. 1 Khalid Mahmood Razaq ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    England was divided as never before; the industrial north from the agricultural south, the industrial working classes from their employers, and both from the long-established gentry, particularly of the south. The Great Exhibition The Great Exhibition of 1851 in London was conceived to symbolize this industrial, military and economic superiority of Great Britain.

  2. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    However the situation suddenly turned around in October when the FAA began to successfully secure the towns of Melanje and Bailundo. This defeat for UNITA was coupled with the external factor of De Beers, the world's largest diamond trader, placing an embargo on Angolan diamonds38.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    In France the second ballot 'majority-runoff' system is used in elections for the Presidency. Candidates obtaining an absolute majority of votes (50 percent+) in the first round are declared elected. If this is not the case a second round is held between the two candidates who got the highest number of votes.

  2. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    A government needs power to protect you from the theft and violence of the lawless neighbour, but what if government itself becomes a source of theft and violence? This statement criticises Hobbs for his assumption that only those in government have not got an evil mind.

  1. Do Elections guarantee Democracy?

    Not all sections of society were represented in the 1997 General Election. Only a small proportion of the population had voted which meant that the majority of Britain were not being represented. The House of Commons also not very representative aswell.

  2. To what extent does parliament protect Britain from an elective dictatorship?

    This leaves the members of the Lords able to make decisions on their knowledge and their consciences. These members of the Lords have been prepared for their role in the lords so they have the knowledge that they need to make informed decisions.

  1. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    Pugachov had called himself Peter III, explaining to the serfs that their miseries were caused by the usurping government of Catherine II. During the early 19th century discontented peasants often supposed that their condition would be alleviated if only the true Tsar knew the facts about their lives.

  2. What is the purpose of elections and do they guarantee a democracy?

    This is in stark contrast to coalition governments, which give enormous power to smaller coalition partners. A minority party, with a relatively small electoral mandate, has enormous power in frustrating the major party's manifesto commitments and policy. This can be seen in the Israeli government, where the minor party 'tail' often ends up 'wagging' the major party 'dog'i.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work