• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the British judiciary's integrity at stake in a constitutional monarchy which does not comply with Montesquieu's base definition of democracy? Transitioning without a written constitution

Extracts from this document...


Edit Sipos Paper 2 "By the latter part of the 20th century the independence of the judges had come under increasing threat from interference by the executive. Recent reforms have, however, served to redress this position and ensure that a proper division of personnel and functions between these two arms of the state is restored. Discuss this statement in the context of the Separation/ Balance of Powers in the UK constitution." French political thinker Montesquieu argued during the Enlightenment that in a democratic state the three branches of government; the legislative, the executive, and the judiciary should not overlap in personnel or function. Is the British judiciary's integrity at stake in a constitutional monarchy which does not comply with Montesquieu's base definition of democracy? Transitioning without a written constitution or clear separation of powers resulted in questionable balance of power amongst the arms of government, and to some extent hampered judicial independence. The United Kingdom's historic and homeostatic governance needed to be severely tweaked to conform to the contemporary world. The UK's judicial system faced challenges similar to those European nations which have moved from despotic to democratic governance; the processes' abridged version most recently featured by members of the Soviet block in the early 1990's. The courts' crucial function of upholding individuals' rights, keeping the executive in line, and defining the meaning of laws relies on a decision making process and judicial review wholly independent from outside forces and considerations. ...read more.


The appointment process has often been criticized for being "haphazard" and an "old-boy network" (Turpin 50) with judges from similar, middle-class backgrounds and an Ox-bridge education (Hartley 169). Unsurprisingly, judges historically tend to be deeply conservative, favouring the property owner, employer, and the status quo. So how much of protecting the citizens rights from an all-mighty government factors in? Not much. In reality, judicial review, or the courts' power to intervene where public authority acts unlawfully, is most often used to bind local government rather than impede the central state (Sueur 467). Although the limitations on the ethos of judicial independence may seem grim, there are in fact increasing legalities vouchsafing judges' unimpeded discharge of their duties. Although the principle of separation of power presupposes judicial neutrality, unabridged independence of the judiciary can only be expected from an independently appointed body of individuals secure in their tenure and livelihood. The appointment process has been significantly re-vamped since 1997, with the High Court being gathered from the entire pool of those eligible for the profession instead of an invitation-only basis. A Commission of Judicial Appointment has also been created for oversight of the system and recommendation. As judicial appointments are meant to be apolitical, judges are expected to abstain from political involvement and are not permitted membership of the House of Commons. ...read more.


Although it is important to secure the independence of judicial administration and review, it is equally important to maintain the precious balance within the government, lest the watchdog becomes the master. Judges are fallible and human, and they will inherently bring with them values instilled in them by society, education, and their family that will subtly influence their decision making. These are inevitable and even desirable aspects of decision making. However, true to the doctrine of judicial independence, they should be free of force, fear, and political considerations. The executive's gain of power seemed to have been curbed in recent years, with increased focus instead on the judiciary. Although many domestic and international laws and conventions aim to further judicial independence, this ideal is best feasible through a culture of integrity of the judiciary, the politicians, and the communities whom the judges serve. Perhaps a significant reason for the feasibility of unwritten laws and conventions United Kingdom in maintain law and order is the "culture of gentlemen". Reference Hartley, T., Griffith, J. "Government and Law." Second ed. Fakenham Press. London. 1981. Kirby, M. "Courts and Politics: Judicial Independence." Yale Law School. 2000. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.hcourt.gov.au/ Sueur, A., Sunkin, M. "Public Law." Longman. London. 1997. Turpin, C. "British Government and the Constitution Text, Cases and Materials." Fifth ed. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 2005. "Judicial Independence, Open Justice and Advance Sentence Indication." Crown Prosecution Service Retrieved from the World Web at: http://www.cps.gov.uk/ ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Britain has a constitutional monarchy. The 'constitutional monarchy' is in which the monarch acknowledges ...

    In another example, the royal family stay as the Head of Church of England. To make this title functioning, their tasks will include things such as appointment of bishops, the opening of the General Synod after the elections every five years as well as giving assent to the promulgation of Canons3.

  2. how can the judiciary protect human rights?

    This shows that although Parliament does remain technically sovereign in the UK, the judiciary is able to exercise and pressure that the government would find difficult to resist, thus protecting civil liberties. The Human Rights Act can also be used by judges as an authority to cancel laws made by the Scottish Parliament where they are incompatible with the HRA.

  1. The advantages of the Uk having a constitutional monarchy are greater than the disadvantages. ...

    the monarchy! Monarchy stands on a very neutral position over each party; she removes 'any shred of ambition or greed'ii. In this cause if the monarchy is abolished, many people still cannot enjoy the equal rights, because no party won all the votes so far.

  2. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    Lord Palmerston and the Liberals Ever since Sir Robert Walpole had become Britain's first prime minister in 1721, the two main competing political groups or parties were the Tories and the Whigs. However, in 1846, the repeal of the Corn Laws by the Tories and their Prime Minister Sir Robert


    However, at the time of Montesquieu England had just had a civil war, and removed a tyrannical monarch in favour of a representative democracy and courts with constituted and well-defined powers. In France, in contrast, Monarchs still enjoyed more or less unlimited power.

  2. The Uk policy making process.

    There are a number of peculiarities about the British system which are worth keeping in mind. Perhaps most strikingly, the political parties in Parliament are incredibly tightly disciplined and cohesive here. In America, it is common for Congresspeople to vote against their party's wishes - indeed, I once worked for

  1. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    Jack Lively a political theorist stated that the fundamental democratic criteria in a democracy are political equality. Jack Lively is stating freedom for citizens to participate in government. For a government system to be truly democratic all the citizens must be members of the legislature and have the right to

  2. Britain has no written constitution or comprehensive Bill of Rights, and is found partly ...

    This in turn has consequences for Parliament sovereignty in the respect that the UK parliament has lost some of its exclusivity in law making power over the citizens of the country. As well as complaints that the unwritten constitution is outdated in a modern society, it has been widely argued

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work