• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Liberal Party Decline - Was it due to the First World War?

Extracts from this document...


10th October 04 A2 History Liberal Party Decline - Was it due to the First World War? The Liberal Party won the 1906 election by a landslide victory and accomplished much to improve the living and working conditions within England. Shortly after the First World War had passed the Liberal Party's support declined greatly, but why? Dangerfield believed that the state of the Liberal Party was that they were doomed to fail prior to the outbreak of war in 1914. Despite the Liberal Party's many remarkable achievements since their landslide victory in 1906, they were also plagued with many problems. For instance the: Constitutional Crisis; challenges from the Labour Party; increasing communist ideas; Trade Unions; Ireland and the Suffragette movement. These were all problems the Liberal Party had to face and combined meant national support for the Liberal was severely hindered. Dangerfield argues that it was not the war years that caused the failure of the Liberal Government but that the damage was caused long before 1914. He argues that before the outbreak of war they were already deceased. Yet there are many criticisms that are aimed at Dangerfield and his ideas, many believe he overlooked the achievements of the Liberals, the impact of New Liberalism and he made many other misjudgements that make his assessment of the pre war era for the Liberals inaccurate. ...read more.


Clearly there had to be something done as more and more strikes were taking place and more militant tactics were being implored. For example in the area of South Wales the Union's actions were especially aggressive and militant due to a large number of syndicalist supporters. The 'Labour unrest' of 1911-1914 seemed a tribute to Syndicalist ideas. The unrest was marked by disputes on railways, docks and mines culminating in the formation of the 'Triple Alliance' of transport workers, miners and railwaymen to coordinate wage demands; evidently matters were being taken into their own hands, and the Liberal wait and see policy was proving ineffective to say the least. The Trade Union challenge raised a large number of issues that the Liberal government failed to deal with, industrial unrest was at its highest ever point. The Liberals remained largely detached from the workers, as did the Labour Party; they left it to the employees themselves to sort out, explaining the more extreme strategies that appeared. The Liberals were in a very difficult position; they did not want to lose the support of the employers, who gave them financial support, by intervening in disputes. They made no real attempt to prevent strikes; instead they acted very harshly when they did by using the army. ...read more.


reform and personal freedom at all, but rather they were reinforcing the ideas in a society of male dominance that they were supposed to be eradicating. The war halted the suffragette movement as it called for national unity; this again suggests to me Dangerfield is off the mark as he does not consider the impact the war had on problems facing the Liberals. Although the Liberal Government faced many problems during their time in power, they were still able to achieve many successes. The Liberals did not have an easy time in government, but fought their battles valiantly, introducing social reform on the way. Election results also suggest that the Liberal Government were not heading for failure but proceeding to continue strongly. I therefore contradict Dangerfield's theory that the Liberal government were doomed to failure prior to World War 1, suggesting that they were still a strong government. It would be easy to make assumptions looking back in hindsight as Dangerfield did, however I would argue that upon entering World War 1 the Liberal Party still appeared to be strong. Unfortunately the nature of the pre war years seem to accentuate the problems and cast a shadow over the achievements, Dangerfield is a clear critique of Liberal England and what it has to offer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Assess the Impact of the First World War on British Politics by 1918.

    the vote to all men over twenty one, without any proper qualifications. For the first time women were also given the vote as a reward for war work done, (although this was only women over thirty). The electorate increased from 8 million to 22 million and it was also possible

  2. "The first World War killed the Liberal Party" how far do you agree with ...

    This resentment was further fuelled by the attacks on civilians carried out by German Aircraft, which for the first time created a civilian life threat by war. DORA can therefore be seen as an example of why the first world war killed the Liberal party, because the people were dissatisfied

  1. Explain the Formation of the Liberal Party

    The economy was booming, with railways springing up all over the country and extremely fast population growth.

  2. How significant was The First World War in the Labour Party's rise to second-party ...

    Fall in demand for coal, ships and steel accompanied by the Coalitions obsession with balancing budgets and cutting expenditure (Geddes Axe) saw a colossal rise in unemployment throughout the 1920's. The unemployment experienced "never fell below a million during the 1920's in the old industrial heartlands of South Wales, the

  1. Critical Book Review - The Strange Death of Liberal England Dangerfield, G. (1966)

    A barrage of abuse was given to politicians who went out to work each day, they were being heckled, attacked and spat at in the street. Women of all ages and social classes went on the rampage, demanding the vote; suffragettes went on rallies not all of them peaceful ones,

  2. "The Rise of the Labour Party between 1893-1914 was due more to the growth ...

    The importance of the trade union support was extremely clear at this point as the Labour Party could not get very far without it.

  1. 'Conservative dominance in British Politics between 1885and 1902 was due to conservative strengths rather ...

    Three days of speaking engagements in Edinburgh showed how he could tailor his speeches to a potentially supportive and middle class audience. He also took the 'liberal' path of laissez-faire. This was important, as it meant that it might win over some of the current liberal supporters.

  2. Why the Labour Party overtook the Liberal Party

    Lloyd George's followers, on the other hand, were more flexible with their principles. This approach to the division of the party would explain why Asquithians were unable to cope with the war - on matters involving principle, they were just too inflexible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work