• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Liberal success in 1906 owed more to conservative failure than liberal organization, To what extent is this an accurate reflection on the election.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Emily Podbielski 12RM Liberal success in 1906 owed more to conservative failure than liberal organization, To what extent is this an accurate reflection on the election. In the 1900's British Politics were dominated by two main political parties, these were the Conservatives and the Liberals. The 19th century had been mainly liberal power, however the Conservatives had dominated the elections for the last decade. In the 1906 election the conservatives suffered from electoral defeat at the hands of the liberals. Results show that in 1900 the Conservative Party had 402 seats whereas the Liberals only gained 157. Six years later they had almost swapped as the Liberals were left with a victory of 400 seats to 184 conservative seats. So why did the voting pattern change so dramatically in the 1906 election and leave the conservatives losing their votes allowing the liberal party to win? People had argued that during his time in office, Arthur Balfour the conservative leader had handled the problems in society unsuccessfully, and had lost the trust from many of his voters. This, along with new policies on the agenda, didn't satisfy the large majority of the voters needs, and therefore he lost their votes too. The growing problems in society during Balfour's government had lead to the increasing unpopularity of the Conservative Party. There had been in 1901, the "Taff Vale" case in which the trades unions had felt that the courts and government were dismissing their legal rights. ...read more.

Middle

This action coming so soon to Britain's humiliation in the Boer War, reminded people the methods of concentration camp ideas and showed that it was barbaric to keep any human being in such conditions, also within these conditions people worried about the morally wrong issue of homosexuality. There were a number of different acts that were placed during the conservative power that lost them votes in the 1906 election. Education had been a let down for the country in times before and the government had seen to change it. The Education Act of 1902 was therefore set up to provide better education to fill the inadequacy in secondary school education. They proposed a number of different policies to cause a new set up for secondary education across Britain. They consisted of; abolishing the old school boards and letting Local Education Authorities, (LEA's) have responsibilities for education, and they wanted to expand education so that more children could attend grant paid and grammar schools. Although there were many changes that were highly useful and that were still in place twenty years ago. Many of the new changes angered groups like the Non Conformists, who were a group of religious Protestants who wanted political, social and religious equality with the Anglicans and other religions. This new act had angered them, as it had meant church schools gained money in a bid to expand this type of education and they wanted it to fade away. This therefore meant a loss of their votes to the Conservative Party and more support to the liberals who promised to abolish the Education act if they came to power. ...read more.

Conclusion

The other problem was that if the public, who disapproved of the Conservatives, voted a mixture of Liberal and Labour there was still a chance that the Conservatives would win the election, as they would always have a number of upper class supporters. To solve this problem, the Liberals decided to team up with Labour so that they would win the majority. Their plan worked, and they avoided the three horse race situation. Thirty out of the twenty-nine constituencies that had stood with the "Lib/Lab" alliance had won the elections. However the Liberals knew that with only fifty seats in parliament, Labour had no chance of winning the election, They only used them to get rid of the Conservative opposition and get a foothold in parliament. To counteract all of the Conservative Failures, The Liberal party ran with the opposite to everything the Conservatives believed. They promised to oppose food taxation, to make food cheaper for the poor, Go against Tariff Reform and support Free Trade, Repeal the Education and Licensing acts which please Non Conformists, and reverse the Taff Vale judgement. This therefore gained the Liberals all the votes from the Non Conservative supporters and led to them winning the election. The Conservative failures in the 1906 elections, had played a big part in the victory of the Liberal Party, However, This was not only the reason for their winning. The Liberals had used their initiative to counteract Conservative policies and gain opposing votes. I therefore think that this is a semi accurate reflection of the election, as it was one of the main reasons for their victory. Word count = 1969 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    Ataturk wanted this idea of Turkish nationalism to remain and therefore he made sure that it was even absorbed from a young age, and so children in school were required to repeat; "I am a Turk, honest and diligent..."11 These were some of the most significant changes, however, Ataturk made

  2. Given Churchill’s popularity in the war, why did he lose the 1945 election?

    The general reason why Churchill lost the 1945 election which applied to most voters, was the fact that Churchill and his party were associated with war and the grim depression years.

  1. Free essay

    Consider the view that the liberal government reforms 1906-1914 were more concerned with the ...

    Although, again there were draw backs. The people that took advantage of the act had to be over seventy and not have criminal convictions. Though it can be argued that there was no longer the moral stigma attached when applying like the previous poor law, which saw participants as victims of their own moral setbacks.

  2. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    end knock the Corn Laws on the head" and after betraying all of the landed interest Peel conservative party no long stood behind him. As Adelman says "Peel victory over the Corn Laws was only achieved - as he eventually came to accept - at the price of his own

  1. Critically evaluate/assess the achievements of Sergei Witte and their consequences for the social groups ...

    Agriculture remained backward and hobbled comprehensive industrialization. Although Russia's industrial growth was among the most rapid in the world, over seven-eighths of the population lived at subsistence level in rural villages. In his 1890 budget report for the Ministry of Finance, Witte wrote, ``The railroad is like a leaven, which creates a cultural fermentation among the population.

  2. To what extent did the Conservatives lose the election rather than the Liberals win ...

    This decision was obviously very unpopular with the trade unions, and gave them the impression that Balfour's government did not care about them. As a result this was extremely unpopular with the working class, as trade unions were the only way the working classes could be represented at this time.

  1. "Conservative success in the years before 1906 was due more too liberal weaknesses than ...

    This bill was backed by many Liberal MPs, but both the Conservative Whigs and a group of radical Liberals opposed the bill and ended up leaving the party.

  2. TO WHAT EXTENT WERE LLOYD GEORGE'S OWN POLICIES, RATHER THAN HIS DEPENDENCE ON THE ...

    He was replaced by Austen Chamberlain, who was no substitute for Bonar Law. His resignation could be seen as speeding up rather than actually causing the downfall of Lloyd George. I personally believe that if Bonar Law didn't resign the coalition would have had an easier passage over the next

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work